Addressing Digital Inequality for the Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Through Government Initiatives: Forms of Capital That Affect ICT Utilization

Digital inequality, or unequal access to and use of information and communication technologies (ICT), is a severe problem preventing the socioeconomically disadvantaged (SED) from participating in a digital society. To understand the critical resources that contribute to digital inequality and inform public policy for stimulating initial and continued ICT usage by the SED, we drew on capital theories and conducted a field study to investigate: (1) the forms of capital for using ICT and how they differ across potential adopters who are SED and socioeconomically advantaged (SEA); (2) how these forms of capitals are relatively impacted for the SEA and the SED through public policy for ICT access; and (3) how each form of capital influences the SED's intentions to use initially and to continue to use ICT. The context for our study involved a city in the southeastern United States that offered its citizens free ICT access for Internet connectivity. Our results show that SED potential adopters exhibited lower cultural capital but higher social capital relative to the SEA. Moreover, the SED who participated in the city's initiative realized greater positive gains in cultural capital, social capital, and habitus than the SEA. In addition, we find that the SED's initial intention to use ICT was influenced by intrinsic motivation for habitus, self-efficacy for cultural capital, and important referents' expectations and support from acquaintances for social capital. Cultural capital and social cultural capital also complemented each other in driving the SED's initial use intention. The SED's continued use intention was affected by both intrinsic and extrinsic motivations for habitus and both knowledge and self-efficacy for cultural capital but was not affected by social capital. We also make several recommendations for future research on digital inequality and ICT acceptance to extend and apply the proposed capital framework.

[1]  B. Kiker Investment in human capital , 1971 .

[2]  G. Psacharopoulos,et al.  Investment in Human Capital. , 1972 .

[3]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[4]  Paul DiMaggio On Pierre Bourdieu , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  P. Bourdieu Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[6]  R. Kessler,et al.  Stress, social status, and psychological distress. , 1979, Journal of health and social behavior.

[7]  W. W. Rozeboom Sensitivity of a linear composite of predictor items to differential item weighting , 1979 .

[8]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[9]  R. Best,et al.  Consumer Behavior: Implications for Marketing Strategy , 1980 .

[10]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[11]  M. Holbrook Aims, Concepts, and Methods for the Representation of Individual Differences in Esthetic Responses to Design Features , 1986 .

[12]  Thomas Hill,et al.  Communicating Innovations: Convincing Computer Phobics to Adopt Innovative Technologies , 1986 .

[13]  A. Bandura,et al.  Social foundation of thoughts and actions: A social cognitive theory , 1986 .

[14]  David R. Williams Socioeconomic Differentials in Health: A Review and Redirection , 1990 .

[15]  R. Stine,et al.  Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[16]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications , 1992 .

[17]  鄭用吉 Dell. Hawkins, Roger J. Best, and Kenneth A. Coney, Consummer Behavior: Implications for Marketing Strategy, Rchard D. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, IL 60430, 1992(5th ed.), XVI+674 , 1992 .

[18]  Richard A. Spreng,et al.  How Does Motivation Moderate the Impact of Central and Peripheral Processing on Brand Attitudes and Intentions , 1992 .

[19]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[20]  A. Portes,et al.  Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Nature and Determinants of IT Acceptance, Routinization, and Infusion , 1993, Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology.

[22]  Ricardo D. Stanton-Salazar,et al.  Social capital and the reproduction of inequality: information networks among Mexican-origin high school students , 1995 .

[23]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement : a paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research , 1997 .

[25]  Nancy Darcovich Literacy skills for the knowledge society: further results from the International Adult Literacy Survey , 1997 .

[26]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research , 1998 .

[27]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[28]  A. Portes Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[29]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Using Davis's Perceived Usefulness and Ease-of-use Instruments for Decision Making: A Confirmatory and Multigroup Invariance Analysis , 1998 .

[30]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Legitimacy, Authority, and Community in Electronic Support Groups , 1998 .

[31]  N. Selwyn,et al.  Switching on the learning society? - questioning the role of technology in widening participation in lifelong learning , 1999 .

[32]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[33]  G. D. Thompson Cultural capital and accounting , 1999 .

[34]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[35]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Quality Management in Systems Development: An Organizational System Perspective , 2000, MIS Q..

[36]  Malcolm Munro,et al.  Assessing User Competence: Conceptualization and Measurement , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy - An Empirical Assessment , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Venkateshviswanath,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000 .

[39]  S. Gorard Adult participation in learning and the economic imperative: a critique of policy in Wales , 2000 .

[40]  L. Rudkin,et al.  Social contact, socioeconomic status, and the health status of older Malaysians. , 2000, The Gerontologist.

[41]  A. Sullivan Cultural Capital and Educational Attainment , 2001 .

[42]  Dhavan V. Shah, Nojin Kwak, R. Lance Holbert "Connecting" and "Disconnecting" With Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital , 2001 .

[43]  M. Sirgy,et al.  A New Measure of Quality of Work Life (QWL) Based on Need Satisfaction and Spillover Theories , 2001 .

[44]  P. Resnick Beyond Bowling Together: SocioTechnical Capital , 2001 .

[45]  G. Driessen Ethnicity, Forms of Capital, and Educational Achievement , 2001 .

[46]  D. Eagle,et al.  Community informatics : shaping computer-mediated social relations , 2001 .

[47]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  "Connecting" and "Disconnecting" With Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital , 2001 .

[48]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Social Implications of the Internet , 2001 .

[49]  Richard Joseph Understanding the Digital Divide , 2001 .

[50]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  A Longitudinal Investigation of Personal Computers in Homes: Adoption Determinants and Emerging Challenges , 2001, MIS Q..

[51]  S. Dumais,et al.  Cultural Capital, Gender, and School Success: The Role of Habitus , 2002 .

[52]  S. Tefft Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2002 .

[53]  Lynette Kvasny Problematizing the digital divide : cultural and social reproduction in a community technology initiative , 2002 .

[54]  M. Keil,et al.  Free Internet Initiative in LaGrange, Georgia , 2002 .

[55]  S. Dika,et al.  Applications of Social Capital in Educational Literature: A Critical Synthesis , 2002 .

[56]  Lynette Kvasny,et al.  The challenges of redressing the digital divide: a tale of two US cities , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[57]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Bridging the Digital Divide: The Effects of Home Computer Ownership and School IT Environment on Self-Directed Learning , 2002, ICIS.

[58]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[59]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Digital Divide , 2002, First Monday.

[60]  H. Bonfadelli The Internet and Knowledge Gaps , 2002 .

[61]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[62]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  User Acceptance Enablers in Individual Decision Making About Technology: Toward an Integrated Model , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[63]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[64]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[65]  Jan van Dijk,et al.  The Digital Divide as a Complex and Dynamic Phenomenon , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[66]  M. Bornstein,et al.  Socioeconomic Status, Parenting, and Child Development , 2003 .

[67]  PremkumarG.,et al.  Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage , 2004 .

[68]  Paul DiMaggio Gender, networks, and cultural capital , 2004 .

[69]  Jos de Haan,et al.  A MULTIFACETED DYNAMIC MODEL OF THE DIGITAL DIVIDE , 2004 .

[70]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective , 2004 .

[71]  D. Reay Education and cultural capital: the implications of changing trends in education policies , 2004, Bourdieu and Education.

[72]  D. Reay ‘It's all becoming a habitus’: beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research , 2004 .

[73]  Nikos Tsikriktsis A Technology Readiness-Based Taxonomy of Customers , 2004 .

[74]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test , 2004, MIS Q..

[75]  P. Henry Hope, hopelessness, and coping: A framework for class-distinctive cognitive capital , 2004 .

[76]  Paul Shafer,et al.  From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use: A Literature Review and Agenda for Research on Digital Inequality , 2004 .

[77]  Ø. Ihlen,et al.  The power of social capital: Adapting Bourdieu to the study of public relations , 2005 .

[78]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Model of Adoption and Technology in Households: A Baseline Model Test and Extension Incorporating Household Life Cycle , 2005, MIS Q..

[79]  Marcy M. Allen,et al.  The Ever-Shifting Internet Population: A New Look At Internet Access and the Digital Divide, Amanda Lenhart (Ed.). The Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC (2003) , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[80]  E. Silva,et al.  Distinction through visual art , 2006 .

[81]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  Extending the Understanding of End User Information Systems Satisfaction Formation: An Equitable Needs Fulfillment Model Approach , 2008, MIS Q..

[82]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Understanding the Adoption of Multipurpose Information Appliances: The Case of Mobile Data Services , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[83]  J. J. Po-An Hsieh,et al.  ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University , 2016 .

[84]  Jung-Sook Lee,et al.  Parent Involvement, Cultural Capital, and the Achievement Gap Among Elementary School Children , 2006 .

[85]  A. Sumner What is Development Studies? , 2006 .

[86]  A. Warde Cultural capital and the place of sport , 2006 .

[87]  E. Silva,et al.  Introduction cultural capital and inequality: Policy issues and contexts , 2006 .

[88]  A. Bebbington Social capital and development studies II , 2007 .

[89]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[90]  M. Hyman,et al.  The Relationship between task complexity and information search: The role of self‐efficacy , 2007 .

[91]  Heejin Lee,et al.  Rethinking the digital divide , 2008 .

[92]  AuN.,et al.  Extending the understanding of end user information systems satisfaction formation , 2008 .

[93]  Gerard Delanty The Foundations of Social Theory , 2009 .

[94]  Simon Egenfeldt-Nielsen,et al.  Beyond Edutainment: Exploring the Educational Potential of Computer Games , 2011 .

[95]  Julian Thomas Defining the digital divide , 2012 .

[96]  C. Stein,et al.  Structural equation modeling. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[97]  G. Kalbarczyk Down to the wire , 2012, BDJ.

[98]  Richard,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace , 2022 .