Sense of presence and sense of place in perceiving a 3D geovisualization for communication in urban planning – Differences introduced by prior familiarity with the place

Abstract Technological development towards increased visual quality and accessibility has made photorealistic 3D geovisualizations an interesting tool for communication in urban planning. Particularly the ability to support perception is important in assessing 3D geovisualizations’ effectiveness for communication. We applied both the concept of sense of presence, i.e. effectiveness of the medium, and sense of place, i.e. meanings and affordances, in a user study conducted through a web-based 3D geovisualization. The study addressed a shopping mall in Helsinki, Finland. We collected a sample of adolescent respondents (n = 122), both familiar and unfamiliar with the geovisualized place in question. Adolescents responded to a survey addressing their perceptions of the mall after the virtual visit. The results indicate that prior familiarity with the place affects the results with the sense of presence, sense of place and preferred urban planning outcome. Familiar respondents were more likely to prefer preservation of the mall. The results show how sense of presence and sense of place work in interplay in the perception of a photorealistic 3D geovisualization. Perception is not only dependent on the realism the 3D geovisualization is able to transmit but also on the individual knowledge and experiences of the audience. According to the results, 3D geovisualizations are best used as supportive tools in communication for urban planning and secondary to a real visit.

[1]  M. Kwan Feminist Visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a Method in Feminist Geographic Research , 2002 .

[2]  David Fonseca,et al.  Informal interactions in 3D education: Citizenship participation and assessment of virtual urban proposals , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Abbas Rajabifard,et al.  A new 3D indoor/outdoor spatial model for indoor emergency response facilitation , 2015 .

[4]  Burcu Akinci,et al.  Automatic Creation of Semantically Rich 3D Building Models from Laser Scanner Data , 2011 .

[5]  Ali Mahdavi-Amiri,et al.  A Survey of Digital Earth , 2015, Comput. Graph..

[6]  Martin White,et al.  Exploring the relationship between presence and enjoyment in a virtual museum , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  E. Pouta,et al.  Residents’ sense of place and landscape perceptions at the rural–urban interface , 2012 .

[8]  Arzu Çöltekin,et al.  SIMULATING NAVIGATION WITH VIRTUAL 3D GEOVISUALIZATIONS - A FOCUS ON MEMORY RELATED FACTORS , 2016 .

[9]  R. Canessa,et al.  Seeing, Believing, and Feeling , 2015 .

[10]  Stewart J. Cohen,et al.  Future visioning of local climate change: A framework for community engagement and planning with scenarios and visualisation , 2011 .

[11]  Max M. North,et al.  A Comparative Study of Sense of Presence of Traditional Virtual Reality and Immersive Environments , 2016, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Dorothy H. Anderson,et al.  Getting From Sense of Place to Place-Based Management: An Interpretive Investigation of Place Meanings and Perceptions of Landscape Change , 2005 .

[13]  K. Hosanagar Enabling Technologies , 2020, 5G Radio Access Network Architecture: The Dark Side of 5G.

[14]  Stephen Ervin,et al.  Digital landscape modeling and visualization: a research agenda , 2001 .

[15]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Depth camera indoor mapping for 3D virtual radio play , 2018 .

[16]  M. Lindquist,et al.  From 3D landscape visualization to environmental simulation: The contribution of sound to the perception of virtual environments , 2016 .

[17]  C. Dwyer Contradictions of Community: Questions of Identity for Young British Muslim Women , 1999 .

[18]  R. Stedman,et al.  Sense of Place, Fast and Slow: The Potential Contributions of Affordance Theory to Sense of Place , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[19]  M. Kyttä The extent of children's independent mobility and the number of actualized affordances as criteria for child-friendly environments , 2004 .

[20]  R. Stedman Is It Really Just a Social Construction?: The Contribution of the Physical Environment to Sense of Place , 2003 .

[21]  Andrew A. Lovett,et al.  Using 3D visualization methods in landscape planning: An evaluation of options and practical issues , 2015 .

[22]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  How Immersive Is Enough? A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Immersive Technology on User Presence , 2016 .

[23]  Herman van der Auweraer,et al.  Digital Twins , 2020, SEMA SIMAI Springer Series.

[24]  S. Shamai,et al.  MEASURING SENSE OF PLACE: METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS , 2005 .

[25]  Arzu Çöltekin,et al.  THE EFFECT OF REALISM ON THE CONFIDENCE IN SPATIAL DATA QUALITY IN STEREOSCOPIC 3D DISPLAYS , 2009 .

[26]  Liz Falconer,et al.  Experiencing sense of place in virtual and physical Avebury , 2017, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[27]  Susanne Bleisch,et al.  3D GEOVISUALIZATION – DEFINITION AND STRUCTURES FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF USEFULNESS , 2012 .

[28]  Jun Hu,et al.  Interactive Storytelling in a Mixed Reality Environment: The Effects of Interactivity on User Experiences , 2014, ICEC.

[29]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  Integrating an urban green space typology into procedural 3D visualization for collaborative planning , 2014, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[30]  Lukáš Herman,et al.  Spatial Analysis of Navigation in Virtual Geographic Environments , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[31]  R. Stedman,et al.  SENSE OF PLACE AS AN ATTITUDE: LAKESHORE OWNERS ATTITUDES TOWARD THEIR PROPERTIES , 2001 .

[32]  Maria Roussou,et al.  Design and Evaluation of a Real-World Virtual Environment for Architecture and Urban Planning , 2007, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[33]  Kevin D. Williams,et al.  The effects of dissociation, game controllers, and 3D versus 2D on presence and enjoyment , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  K. P. Kallio,et al.  Children and Young People's Politics in Everyday Life , 2013 .

[35]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Design and evaluation , 1995 .

[36]  S. Zlatanova,et al.  Applications of 3 D City Models : State of the Art Review , 2015 .

[37]  Tony Clear,et al.  Shaping Behaviours Through Space and Place in Gamified Virtual Learning Environments , 2015 .

[38]  Steve Wheeler,et al.  Second Life: an overview of the potential of 3-D virtual worlds in medical and health education. , 2007, Health information and libraries journal.

[39]  Heather A. Lukacs,et al.  The Relationship of Place Re-Making and Watershed Group Participation in Appalachia , 2014 .

[40]  A. Çöltekin,et al.  Investigating the use of 3D geovisualizations for urban design in informal settlement upgrading in South Africa , 2016 .

[41]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Evaluation of Data Visualisation Options for Land-Use Policy and Decision Making in Response to Climate Change , 2013 .

[42]  J. V. Dijk Digital Divide: Impact of Access , 2017 .

[43]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Virtual Space and Place: Theory and Test , 2011, MIS Q..

[44]  Xuwei Chen,et al.  A comparison of usefulness of 2D and 3D representations of urban planning , 2015 .

[45]  Timo Ojala,et al.  VirtualOulu: collaborative, immersive and extensible 3D city model on the web , 2016, Web3D.

[46]  Filip Biljecki,et al.  Applications of 3D City Models: State of the Art Review , 2015, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[47]  Phil Turner,et al.  Place, Sense of Place, and Presence , 2006, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[48]  Liane Thuvander,et al.  In search of visualization challenges: The development and implementation of visualization tools for supporting dialogue in urban planning processes , 2017 .

[49]  Min Chen,et al.  Virtual geographic environments in socio-environmental modeling: a fancy distraction or a key to communication? , 2018, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[50]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Subjective responses to simulated and real environments: a comparison , 2003 .

[51]  Y. Tuan Space and Place: Humanistic Perspective , 1979 .

[52]  P. Gustafson MEANINGS OF PLACE: EVERYDAY EXPERIENCE AND THEORETICAL CONCEPTUALIZATIONS , 2001 .

[53]  Elina Kilpi-Jakonen Does Finnish Educational Equality Extend to Children of Immigrants? , 2012 .

[54]  Josep Blat,et al.  3D graphics on the web: A survey , 2014, Comput. Graph..

[55]  Sophie A. Nicholson-Cole Representing climate change futures: a critique on the use of images for visual communication , 2005, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[56]  Jürgen Döllner,et al.  Abstract representations for interactive visualization of virtual 3D city models , 2009, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[57]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Photorealistic Building Reconstruction from Mobile Laser Scanning Data , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[58]  Ian J. Grimstead,et al.  Collaborative visualization: current systems and future trends , 2011, Web3D '11.

[59]  V. R. Mandla,et al.  VIRTUAL 3 D CITY MODELING : TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS , 2013 .

[60]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Using gamification to inspire new citizen science volunteers , 2013, Gamification.

[61]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[62]  Christophe Girot,et al.  Point cloud modeling as a bridge between landscape design and planning , 2020 .

[63]  M. Lewicka Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? , 2011 .

[64]  Mel Slater,et al.  Measuring Presence: A Response to the Witmer and Singer Presence Questionnaire , 1999, Presence.

[65]  WhiteMartin,et al.  Exploring the relationship between presence and enjoyment in a virtual museum , 2010 .

[66]  Arzu Çöltekin,et al.  ON THE USABILITY AND USEFULNESS OF 3D (GEO)VISUALIZATIONS – A FOCUS ON VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENTS , 2016 .

[67]  Andrew Y. C. Nee,et al.  Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin , 2019 .

[68]  Rainer Ressl,et al.  Geovisualization with immersive virtual environments in theory and practice , 2018, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[69]  G. Marks Are between- and within-school differences in student performance largely due to socio-economic background? Evidence from 30 countries , 2006 .

[70]  Doris Dransch,et al.  Designing Suitable Cartographic Multimedia Presentations , 2007 .

[71]  M. Pavlovskaya Critical GIS as a tool for social transformation , 2018 .

[72]  R. Canessa,et al.  Seeing, Believing, and Feeling: The Relationship between Sense of Place and Geovisualization Research , 2015 .

[73]  Matthias Rauterberg,et al.  Interactive storytelling in a mixed reality environment: The effects of interactivity on user experiences , 2014, Entertain. Comput..

[74]  Renato Pajarola,et al.  Storytelling in Interactive 3D Geographic Visualization Systems , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[75]  Van Hoven,et al.  Making sense of place: exploring creative and (inter)active research methods with young people , 2010 .

[76]  May Lin Wee,et al.  Investigating the Effect of 3D Simulation Based Learning on the Motivation and Performance of Engineering Students , 2010 .

[77]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Automated Multi-Sensor 3D Reconstruction for the Web , 2019, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[78]  Burcu Akinci,et al.  Automatic Creation of Semantically Rich 3D Building Models from Laser Scanner Data , 2013 .

[79]  R. Stedman,et al.  Sense of place in environmental education , 2012 .

[80]  Cam Campbell,et al.  The digital workshop: exploring the use of interactive and immersive visualisation tools in participatory planning. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[81]  C. Raymond,et al.  The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment , 2007 .

[82]  D. Massey Space, Place, and Gender , 1994 .

[83]  Nadine Schuurman,et al.  Formalization Matters: Critical GIS and Ontology Research , 2006 .

[84]  Jonathan Freeman,et al.  A Cross-Media Presence Questionnaire: The ITC-Sense of Presence Inventory , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[85]  Andrew A. Lovett,et al.  GIS-based visualisation of rural landscapes: Defining 'sufficient' realism for environmental decision-making , 2003 .

[86]  Hannu Hyyppä,et al.  Customized Visualizations of Urban Infill Development Scenarios for Local Stakeholders , 2015 .

[87]  Christoph Klimmt,et al.  A Process Model of the Formation of Spatial Presence Experiences , 2007 .

[88]  Maria Seton,et al.  The GPlates Portal: Cloud-Based Interactive 3D Visualization of Global Geophysical and Geological Data in a Web Browser , 2016, PloS one.

[89]  Ulrike Wissen Hayek,et al.  Which is the Appropriate 3D Visualization Type for Participatory Landscape Planning Workshops? A Portfolio of Their Effectiveness , 2011 .

[90]  Tomás Urbánek,et al.  Identification of altitude profiles in 3D geovisualizations: the role of interaction and spatial abilities , 2019, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[91]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  Geovisual analytics for spatial decision support: Setting the research agenda , 2007, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[92]  Dimitra Dodou,et al.  Five-Point Likert Items: t test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon , 2010 .

[93]  M. Antrop Sustainable landscapes: contradiction, fiction or utopia? , 2006 .

[94]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  Apply an Augmented Reality in a Mobile Guidance to Increase Sense of Place for Heritage Places , 2015, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[95]  R. Newell Exploring realistic immersive geovisualizations as tools for inclusive approaches to coastal planning and management , 2017 .

[96]  Tovi Fenster,et al.  Memory and place in participatory planning , 2014 .

[97]  M. Hahn,et al.  3D Building Reconstruction Using Dense Photogrammetric Point Cloud , 2016 .

[98]  L. Sébastien The power of place in understanding place attachments and meanings , 2020 .

[99]  Timo Ojala,et al.  A Qualitative Study on the Effects of Real-World Stimuli and Place Familiarity on Presence , 2019, 2019 IEEE 5th Workshop on Everyday Virtual Reality (WEVR).

[100]  Kamal Jain,et al.  VIRTUAL 3D CITY MODELING: TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS , 2013 .

[101]  William Cartwright,et al.  Geographical visualization: A participatory planning support tool for imagining landscape futures , 2006 .