Learning and Recognizing Archeological Features from LiDAR Data

We present a remote sensing pipeline that processes LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) data through machine & deep learning for the application of archeological feature detection on big geo-spatial data platforms such as e.g. IBM PAIRS Geoscope [1], [2].Today, archeologists get overwhelmed by the task of visually surveying huge amounts of (raw) LiDAR data in order to identify areas of interest for inspection on the ground. We showcase a software system pipeline that results in significant savings in terms of expert productivity while missing only a small fraction of the artifacts.Our work employs artificial neural networks in conjunction with an efficient spatial segmentation procedure based on domain knowledge. Data processing is constraint by a limited amount of training labels and noisy LiDAR signals due to vegetation cover and decay of ancient structures. We aim at identifying geo-spatial areas with archeological artifacts in a supervised fashion allowing the domain expert to flexibly tune parameters based on her needs.

[1]  Peter Marshall,et al.  Archaeological investigation and charcoal analysis of charcoal burning platforms, Barbon, Cumbria, UK , 2017 .

[2]  S. Prince,et al.  LiDAR for Archaeological Landscape Analysis: A Case Study of Two Eighteenth-Century Maryland Plantation Sites , 2006, American Antiquity.

[3]  Nigel Hinds,et al.  PAIRS: A scalable geo-spatial data analytics platform , 2015, IEEE BigData.

[4]  J. R. Smith,et al.  Coordinate systems and map projections , 1973 .

[5]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.

[6]  Florencia Pezzutti,et al.  Identifying Ancient Settlement Patterns through LiDAR in the Mosquitia Region of Honduras , 2016, PloS one.

[7]  Hendrik F. Hamann,et al.  IBM PAIRS curated big data service for accelerated geospatial data analytics and discovery , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data).

[8]  Desa.  Coordinate systems and map projections , 2013 .

[9]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  From features to fingerprints: A general diagnostic framework for anthropogenic geomorphology , 2019, Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment.

[10]  Li Li,et al.  Automated Extraction of the Archaeological Tops of Qanat Shafts from VHR Imagery in Google Earth , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[11]  Herbert Freeman,et al.  Determining the minimum-area encasing rectangle for an arbitrary closed curve , 1975, CACM.

[12]  R. Lasaponara,et al.  Flights into the past: full-waveform airborne laser scanning data for archaeological investigation , 2011 .

[13]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A Review of Image Denoising Algorithms, with a New One , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[14]  Ø. Trier,et al.  Automatic Detection of Pit Structures in Airborne Laser Scanning Data , 2012 .

[15]  O. Ersoy.  A comparative review of real and complex Fourier-related transforms , 1994, Proc. IEEE.

[16]  Arlen F. Chase,et al.  Geospatial revolution and remote sensing LiDAR in Mesoamerican archaeology , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  C. Briese,et al.  Archaeological prospection of forested areas using full-waveform airborne laser scanning , 2008 .

[18]  R. Shrestha,et al.  Ancient lowland Maya complexity as revealed by airborne laser scanning of northern Guatemala , 2018, Science.

[19]  S. Crutchley,et al.  New light on an ancient landscape: lidar survey in the Stonehenge World Heritage Site , 2005, Antiquity.

[20]  Alexandre Guyot,et al.  Detecting Neolithic Burial Mounds from LiDAR-Derived Elevation Data Using a Multi-Scale Approach and Machine Learning Techniques , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[21]  Mark Goadrich,et al.  The relationship between Precision-Recall and ROC curves , 2006, ICML.