Everything Else Being Equal: A Modal Logic for Ceteris Paribus Preferences
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Fenrong Liu,et al. Optimality, Belief and Preference , 2006 .
[2] Edmund M. Clarke,et al. Proceedings of the Carnegie Mellon Workshop on Logic of Programs , 1983 .
[3] Sieuwert Maarten van Otterloo,et al. A strategic analysis of multi-agent protocols , 2005 .
[4] B. D. Bruin,et al. Explaining games : on the logic of game theoretic explanations , 2004 .
[5] J. Doyle,et al. Representing Preferences as Ceteris Paribus Comparatives , 1994 .
[6] W. Hoek,et al. Dynamic Epistemic Logic , 2007 .
[7] Johan van Benthem,et al. Dynamic logic of preference upgrade , 2007, J. Appl. Non Class. Logics.
[8] Soren Hallden,et al. On the Logic of `Better.' , 1958 .
[9] Joseph Y. Halpern. Defining Relative Likelihood in Partially-Ordered Structures , 1997, J. Artif. Intell. Res..
[10] N. Rescher. The Logic of Preference , 1968 .
[11] Erik J Olsson,et al. ON THE ROLE OF THE RESEARCH AGENDA IN EPISTEMIC CHANGE , 2006 .
[12] Richard Spencer-Smith,et al. Modal Logic , 2007 .
[13] Y. Murakami. Logic and Social Choice , 1968 .
[14] Joseph Persky,et al. Retrospectives: Ceteris Paribus , 1990 .
[15] Cees Witteveen,et al. A Modal Characterization of Nash Equilibrium , 2003, Fundam. Informaticae.
[16] Soren Hallden,et al. On the logic of "better" , 1957 .
[17] Krister Segerberg,et al. An essay in classical modal logic , 1971 .
[18] Johan van Benthem,et al. FOR BETTER OR FOR WORSE: DYNAMIC LOGICS OF PREFERENCE , 2009 .
[19] Gerhard Schurz,et al. Ceteris Paribus Laws , 2001 .
[20] Jouko Vnnen,et al. Dependence Logic: A New Approach to Independence Friendly Logic (London Mathematical Society Student Texts) , 2007 .
[21] John Worrall,et al. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Volume 1: Philosophical Papers , 1980 .
[22] Johan van Benthem,et al. Dynamic logic for belief revision , 2007, J. Appl. Non Class. Logics.
[23] Rohit Parikh,et al. A Decision Procedure for the Propositional µ-Calculus , 1983, Logic of Programs.
[24] Olivier Roy,et al. Preference logic, conditionals and solution concepts in games , 2005 .
[25] Imre Lakatos,et al. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1978 .
[26] Leon van der Torre,et al. Hidden Uncertainty in the Logical Representation of Desires , 2003, IJCAI.
[27] H. Kyburg,et al. How the laws of physics lie , 1984 .
[28] R. E. Jennings. VIII.—PREFERENCE AND CHOICE AS LOGICAL CORRELATES , 1967 .
[29] Henrik Lagerlund,et al. Modality Matters: Twenty-Five Essays in Honour of Krister Segerberg , 2006 .
[30] D. Gabbay. An Irreflexivity Lemma with Applications to Axiomatizations of Conditions on Tense Frames , 1981 .
[31] Craig Boutilier,et al. Toward a Logic for Qualitative Decision Theory , 1994, KR.
[32] Joseph Y. Halpern. Defining Relative Likelihood in Partially-Ordered Preferential Structures , 1996, UAI.
[33] Andreas Herzig,et al. A modal logic for epistemic tests , 2000, ECAI.
[34] Jouko A. Väänänen,et al. Dependence Logic - A New Approach to Independence Friendly Logic , 2007, London Mathematical Society student texts.
[35] J. Fodor. You can fool some of the people all of the time , 1991 .
[36] Uwe Mönnich,et al. Aspects of Philosophical Logic , 1981 .
[37] Liu. Changing for the better : preference dynamics and agent diversity , .
[38] O. Roy. Thinking before acting : intentions, logic, rational choice , 2008 .
[39] Jelle Gerbrandy,et al. Dynamic epistemic logic , 1998 .
[40] Patrick Girard,et al. Modal logic for belief and preference change , 2008 .
[41] I. Lakatos. Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1976 .