Advancing approaches for understanding the nature-people link

Abstract Acknowledging complexity within relationships between fundamental ecology and societal research is critical in improving our current understanding of how natural ecosystems work and how they could be managed to achieve set management goals. Specifically, this challenge is linked to the multifunctional nature of ecosystems. We develop the Bayesian Belief Multifunctionality Framework to studying nature-people links that allows a holistic and transparent analysis of the relationships between species, their functional traits, multiple ecosystem functions and multiple nature's contributions to people (NCPs). We assess seven ecosystem functions common in marine soft-sediments (secondary production, metal sequestration, denitrification, N-release, sediment stability, primary production and sediment formation) and nine NCPs (food and feed, supporting services, climate regulation, regulation of coastal water quality, physical and psychological experience, habitat creation, learning, materials and erosion control). We use a case study based on an extensive and diverse intertidal sandflat macrofaunal community within Kaipara Harbour, New Zealand. By testing different scenarios in which we identify the set of traits responsible for the highest function performance for every function, we show that functional redundancy (i.e., the presence of multiple species that deliver the maximum performance for a specific function) was high for some functions but low for others. In our model, functional redundancy was the lowest for denitrification and secondary production, while primary production exhibited high functional redundancy. The network analysis also allowed us to gain insight into functional synergies and trade-offs, resulting from maximising individual function to a trait set. The trait set that maximised secondary production contributes to higher sediment stability; the trait set that maximised metal sequestration contributes to higher N-release; and the trait set that maximised denitrification contributes to high rates of metal sequestration and N-release. Negative effects were also apparent, e.g., the trait set that maximised metal sequestration resulted in a lower probability in sediment stability and secondary production. Finally, the scenario testing feature of the framework allowed for exploration of the changes in NCPs from changes in macrofauna density. High density of species with a trait set identified as important to individual functions generated an increase in the provision of the majority of considered NCPs. Thanks to its clear and transparent result presentation and flexible analysis, the BN Multifunctionality Framework can deliver insightful messages into multifunctionality links helping to reveal the multifunctional nature of diverse and complex natural ecosystems.

[1]  Martin Daufresne,et al.  A user's guide to functional diversity indices , 2010 .

[2]  Serena H. Chen,et al.  Good practice in Bayesian network modelling , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  Anna F. Cord,et al.  Multifunctionality assessments – More than assessing multiple ecosystem functions and services? A quantitative literature review , 2019, Ecological Indicators.

[4]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis , 2004 .

[5]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability , 2015 .

[6]  C. Kremen Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? , 2005, Ecology letters.

[7]  Henrik Andrén,et al.  Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species , 2013, Nature Communications.

[8]  Jarrett E. K. Byrnes,et al.  Marine biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: what’s known and what’s next? , 2015 .

[9]  Steven Broekx,et al.  A review of Bayesian belief networks in ecosystem service modelling , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[10]  Klaus Glenk,et al.  Operationalizing an ecosystem services-based approach using Bayesian Belief Networks: An application to riparian buffer strips , 2015 .

[11]  Douglas C. MacMillan,et al.  The Delphi process – an expert‐based approach to ecological modelling in data‐poor environments , 2006 .

[12]  V. Dakos,et al.  Toward Principles for Enhancing the Resilience of Ecosystem Services , 2012 .

[13]  G. Daily,et al.  Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity , 2012, Nature.

[14]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[15]  Hiroyuki Matsuda,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem services science for a sustainable planet: the DIVERSITAS vision for 2012-20. , 2012, Current opinion in environmental sustainability.

[16]  P. Tryjanowski,et al.  The dark side of the “redundancy hypothesis” and ecosystem assessment , 2016 .

[17]  G. Pierce,et al.  How biodiversity affects ecosystem functioning: roles of infaunal species richness, identity and density in the marine benthos , 2006 .

[18]  Sakari Kuikka,et al.  Bene-Eia: A Bayesian Approach to Expert Judgment Elicitation with Case Studies on Climate Change Impacts on Surface Waters , 1997 .

[19]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Fusion, Propagation, and Structuring in Belief Networks , 1986, Artif. Intell..

[20]  M. J. Hensel,et al.  Biodiversity enhances ecosystem multifunctionality across trophic levels and habitats , 2015, Nature Communications.

[21]  Daniel Chessel,et al.  A fuzzy coding approach for the analysis of long‐term ecological data , 1994 .

[22]  L. Gamfeldt,et al.  Revisiting the biodiversity–ecosystem multifunctionality relationship , 2017, Nature Ecology &Evolution.

[23]  C. Pilditch,et al.  Changes in the location of biodiversity–ecosystem function hot spots across the seafloor landscape with increasing sediment nutrient loading , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  B. Muys,et al.  Jack-of-all-trades effects drive biodiversity–ecosystem multifunctionality relationships in European forests , 2016, Nature Communications.

[25]  F. Plas Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in naturally assembled communities , 2019 .

[26]  I. Fazey,et al.  An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies , 2012 .

[27]  Anders L. Madsen,et al.  Operationalising ecosystem service assessment in Bayesian Belief Networks: experiences within the OpenNESS project , 2017 .

[28]  Alf Norkko,et al.  Template for using biological trait groupings when exploring large-scale variation in seafloor multifunctionality. , 2018, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[29]  G. Mace,et al.  Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[30]  Rafael Rumí,et al.  Bayesian networks in environmental modelling , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[31]  Rebecca A. Kelly,et al.  Integration modelling and decision support: A case study of the Coastal Lake Assessment and Management (CLAM) Tool , 2008, Math. Comput. Simul..

[32]  R. Marinelli,et al.  Evidence for density-dependent effects of infauna on sediment biogeochemistry and benthic–pelagic coupling in nearshore systems , 2003 .

[33]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making , 2010 .

[34]  A. Church,et al.  Understanding the diversity of values of “Nature’s contributions to people”: insights from the IPBES Assessment of Europe and Central Asia , 2019, Sustainability Science.

[35]  S. Polasky,et al.  Assessing nature's contributions to people , 2018, Science.

[36]  Léa Beaumelle,et al.  A niche for ecosystem multifunctionality in global change research , 2018, Global change biology.

[37]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  Multiple functions increase the importance of biodiversity for overall ecosystem functioning. , 2008, Ecology.

[38]  J. Connolly,et al.  Testing the effects of diversity on ecosystem multifunctionality using a multivariate model , 2015 .

[39]  Robert Bagchi,et al.  When Do More Species Maximize More Ecosystem Services? , 2019, Trends in plant science.

[40]  Volker Grimm,et al.  Merging validation and evaluation of ecological models to ‘evaludation’: A review of terminology and a practical approach , 2014 .

[41]  M. C. Runge,et al.  Ask not what nature can do for you: A critique of ecosystem services as a communication strategy , 2018, Biological Conservation.

[42]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go? , 2017 .

[43]  Investigating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality: challenges and solutions , 2013, 1305.1985.

[44]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  Martin Schaefer,et al.  Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition , 2015, Ecology letters.

[46]  François Bousquet,et al.  Modelling with stakeholders , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[47]  S. Managi,et al.  Valuation of nature and nature’s contributions to people , 2019, Sustainability Science.

[48]  Jie Shi,et al.  Multi-objective modelling and decision support using a Bayesian network approximation to a non-point source pollution model , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[49]  Rebecca V. Gladstone‐Gallagher,et al.  Old Tools, New Ways of Using Them: Harnessing Expert Opinions to Plan for Surprise in Marine Socio-Ecological Systems , 2019, Front. Mar. Sci..

[50]  Giovanni Coco,et al.  Forecasting the limits of resilience: integrating empirical research with theory , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  Solveig Höfer,et al.  A Bayesian approach to ecosystem service trade-off analysis utilizing expert knowledge , 2019, Environment Systems and Decisions.

[52]  M. Loreau Linking biodiversity and ecosystems: towards a unifying ecological theory , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[53]  Laura Uusitalo,et al.  Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling , 2007 .

[54]  Jurek Kolasa,et al.  Complexity, system integration, and susceptibility to change: Biodiversity connection , 2005 .

[55]  Unai Pascual,et al.  Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services-ADVANCE UNEDITED VERSION , 2019 .

[56]  Stanley T. Asah,et al.  Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach , 2017 .

[57]  Philippe Gourbesville,et al.  Overcoming data scarcity in flood hazard assessment using remote sensing and artificial neural network , 2019, Smart Water.

[58]  S. Thrush,et al.  Interaction networks in coastal soft-sediments highlight the potential for change in ecological resilience. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[59]  Kelly A. Carscadden,et al.  Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services , 2011 .

[60]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Shaping global environmental decisions using socio-ecological models. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[61]  Steven Broekx,et al.  Bayesian belief networks to analyse trade-offs among ecosystem services at the regional scale , 2016 .

[62]  P. Snelgrove,et al.  Real world biodiversity-ecosystem functioning: a seafloor perspective. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[63]  L. Jones,et al.  A global review of the ecosystem services provided by bivalve aquaculture , 2018, Reviews in Aquaculture.

[64]  A. Hector,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality , 2007, Nature.

[65]  K. Norris Biodiversity in the context of ecosystem services: the applied need for systems approaches , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[66]  R. Ostfeld,et al.  A call to ecologists: measuring, analyzing, and managing ecosystem services , 2005 .

[67]  Fernando Soler-Toscano,et al.  Measuring complexity to infer changes in the dynamics of ecological systems under stress , 2017 .