A new approach to identifying the elastic behaviour of a manufacturing machine

Abstract The dynamic solicitations imposed on modern production machines make the rigid body hypothesis obsolete in mechanical design. To increase productivity while ensuring effector trajectory quality, numerical control of the machine has to integrate the elastic deformations of machine parts. To reach this objective, the elastic behaviour of the machine has to be accurately predicted by a simple but efficient elastic model. This model should involve low-cost computation to be implemented in a real-time control loop, and also necessitates an accurate identification process to attain the required precision. The paper proposes to model the elastic behaviour of the machine using an efficient mass–spring–damper model. The main contribution lies in a new approach to accurately identifying the elastic model parameters. Instead of using modal analysis, the new approach is based on time domain identification using a specific metrological device. The measurement system developed and described in this paper is based on combined computer vision and inertial sensor data. First, the displacements of points of interest on the machine part are tracked and measured by a standard digital camera (0.8 Mega pixels and 30 frames/s). A subpixelar detector allows us to reach a level of accuracy equal to 30 μm (maximum error) for a displacement up to 300 mm away from the sensor, but 30 Hz image sampling does not provide enough information to get all details of the overall movement. So secondly, accelerometers are added to get the required information to over-sample the vision data without additional error; by doing so the effective sampling frequency increases from 30 Hz to 15 kHz. The proposed identification method is applied to a real industrial system; the results obtained in elastic deformation prediction are quite satisfactory and validate the new approach proposed in this paper.

[1]  Zhe Li,et al.  Kinematic and dynamic synthesis of a parallel kinematic high speed drilling machine , 2004 .

[2]  John C. Ziegert,et al.  Fundamental Comparison of the Use of Serial and Parallel Kinematics for Machines Tools , 1999 .

[3]  David Te-Yen Huang,et al.  On obtaining machine tool stiffness by CAE techniques , 2001 .

[4]  Pierre-Jean Barre,et al.  Modélisation du comportement dynamique et commande d'une machine-outil agile , 2002 .

[5]  Timothy A. Clarke,et al.  Comparison of some techniques for the subpixel location of discrete target images , 1994, Other Conferences.

[6]  Kai Cheng,et al.  Modelling the machining dynamics of peripheral milling , 2005 .

[7]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Dynamics of Multibody Systems , 2020 .

[8]  Michel Dhome,et al.  Do We Really Need an Accurate Calibration Pattern to Achieve a Reliable Camera Calibration? , 1998, ECCV.

[9]  S. Jack Hu,et al.  Finite Element Analysis and Comparison of Two Hybrid Robots-the Tricept and the TriVariant , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[10]  Pierre-Jean Barre,et al.  Control of an Industrial Robot using Acceleration Feedback , 2006, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[11]  Pascal Ray,et al.  Modélisation des manipulateurs flexibles appliquée aux machines-outils UTGVModeling of flexible manipulators applied to HSMW machine tools , 2002 .

[12]  Richard Bearee,et al.  Influence du jerk sur le comportement dynamique d'un robot cartésien 3 axes , 2005 .

[13]  D. Renton,et al.  Motion control for linear motor feed drives in advanced machine tools , 2001 .