Differential physiological and morphological responses of two hybrid Populus clones to water stress.

Hardwood cuttings of Populus clones Tristis #1 and Eugenei were grown in pots in a controlled environment chamber to observe early patterns of growth and water relations in response to changing conditions of water stress. Height and dry weight growth, dry matter partitioning, leaf area production, stomatal conductance and leaf water potential were measured periodically during the 73-day experiment. The two clones reacted in a similar way to an initial period of stress, showing reduced growth, stomatal conductance and leaf water potential. However, when stress was interrupted by ample watering and then reimposed, substantial differences between the clones were evident. Growth of Eugenei fully recovered after stress was relieved, especially leaf growth, but when water deficiency was reimposed, the plants wilted and some leaves died. Tristis #1, in contrast, showed a greater adaptation to changing stress conditions; it grew less than Eugenei after drought was interrupted, but showed little adverse effect of renewed water deficits. These responses were partially explained by the higher root/leaf weight ratios of Tristis #1 which enabled it to maintain a more favorable plant water status than Eugenei.

[1]  T. Hinckley,et al.  Stomatal responses of Populus to leaf water potential , 1987 .

[2]  R. Buis,et al.  La surface foliaire, déterminant du développement chez le Soja (Glycine max). Régulation inter-compartiments tige principale ― rameaux , 1986 .

[3]  T. Tschaplinski,et al.  Stomatal control of water use efficiency in poplar clones and hybrids , 1984 .

[4]  F. Kelliher,et al.  Stomatal resistance, transpiration, and growth of drought-stressed eastern cottonwood. , 1980 .

[5]  S. Pallardy,et al.  Frequency and length of stomata of 21 Populus clones , 1979 .

[6]  S. Running,et al.  Leaf Area of Mature Northwestern Coniferous Forests: Relation to Site Water Balance , 1977 .

[7]  D W Henderson,et al.  Immediate and subsequent growth responses of maize leaves to changes in water status. , 1971, Plant physiology.

[8]  P B Green,et al.  Metabolic and physical control of cell elongation rate: in vivo studies in nitella. , 1971, Plant physiology.

[9]  J. Boyer,et al.  Leaf enlargement and metabolic rates in corn, soybean, and sunflower at various leaf water potentials. , 1970, Plant physiology.

[10]  J. Boyer Differing sensitivity of photosynthesis to low leaf water potentials in corn and soybean. , 1970, Plant physiology.

[11]  J. Boyer,et al.  Relationship of water potential to growth of leaves. , 1968, Plant physiology.

[12]  A. Smucker,et al.  Carbon Utilization and Losses by Plant Root Systems 1 , 1984 .

[13]  N. Nelson,et al.  Comparative carbon dioxide exchange for two Populus clones grown in growth room, greenhouse, and field environments , 1984 .

[14]  J. G. Isebrands,et al.  Yield physiology of short rotation intensively cultured poplars , 1983 .

[15]  D. Dickmann,et al.  The culture of poplars in eastern North America. , 1983 .

[16]  D. Dickmann,et al.  Developmental Patterns of CO2 Exchange, Diffusion Resistance and Protein Synthesis in Leaves of Populus x euramericana , 1975 .

[17]  J. Eubanks Effects of Light Intensity and Osmotic Stress on the Water Relations of Populus Tremuloides , 1969 .

[18]  J. Bonner,et al.  The Response of The Young Tomato Plant to a Brief Period of Water Shortage. IV. Effects of Water Stress on the Ribonucleic Acid Metabolism of Tomato Leaves. , 1959, Plant physiology.

[19]  D. J. Watson The Physiological Basis of Variation in Yield , 1952 .