Robust autothermal microchannel reactors

Abstract Autothermal microchannel reactors are intensified process units that bring significant energy efficiency benefits over their conventional counterparts. Efficiency gains are obtained, however, at the cost of operational challenges. These stem from the loss of control handles that is inherent to combining several unit operations in a single physical device. In this paper, we investigate the impact of two recently proposed reactor design concepts (a segmented catalyst macromorphology and an embedded layer of phase change material) aimed at improving the steady state energy distribution and, respectively, preventing the advent of hotspots during transient operation, on reactor dynamics and control. Using an autothermal microchannel reactor coupling steam methane reforming with methane catalytic combustion as a prototype system, we demonstrate through rigorous simulations that these design innovations have a synergistic effect, resulting in superior steady-state performance and excellent disturbance rejection ability.

[1]  Klavs F. Jensen,et al.  A microfabricated suspended-tube chemical reactor for thermally efficient fuel processing , 2003 .

[2]  Michael Baldea,et al.  Dynamics and control of autothermal reactors for the production of hydrogen , 2007, 2007 European Control Conference (ECC).

[3]  Prodromos Daoutidis,et al.  Optimal design and observation of counter-current autothermal reactors for the production of hydrogen , 2009, 2009 American Control Conference.

[4]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Recuperative coupling of exothermic and endothermic reactions , 2006 .

[5]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Design of resilient processing plants—I Process design under consideration of dynamic aspects , 1982 .

[6]  A. D. Solomon,et al.  Mathematical Modeling Of Melting And Freezing Processes , 1992 .

[7]  Michael Baldea,et al.  Pseudodistributed Feed Configurations for Catalytic Plate Microchannel Reactors , 2014 .

[8]  A. I. Stankiewicz,et al.  Process Intensification: Transforming Chemical Engineering , 2000 .

[9]  Paolo Ciambelli,et al.  Micro-Scale Catalytic Reactor for Syngas Production , 2010 .

[10]  K. Jensen.  Microreaction engineering * is small better? , 2001 .

[11]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Coupling exothermic and endothermic reactions in adiabatic reactors , 2008 .

[12]  Prodromos Daoutidis,et al.  Dynamic output feedback control of minimum-phase multivariable nonlinear processes , 1994 .

[13]  Aristides Morillo,et al.  Heat‐Integrated Reactor Concepts for Hydrogen Production by Methane Steam Reforming , 2005 .

[14]  Mustafa Karakaya,et al.  Microchannel reactor modeling for combustion driven reforming of iso-octane , 2011 .

[15]  Michael Baldea,et al.  Temperature Control and Optimal Energy Management using Latent Energy Storage , 2013 .

[16]  Gregory S. Jackson,et al.  Transient modeling of combined catalytic combustion/CH4 steam reforming , 2003 .

[17]  P. Pfeifer,et al.  Comparison between a micro reactor with multiple air inlets and a monolith reactor for oxidative steam reforming of diesel , 2014 .

[18]  Asterios Gavriilidis,et al.  Catalytic combustion assisted methane steam reforming in a catalytic plate reactor , 2003 .

[19]  Gerhart Eigenberger,et al.  Efficient reactor concepts for coupling of endothermic and exothermic reactions , 2002 .

[20]  Robert J. Kee,et al.  Methane steam reforming in a novel ceramic microchannel reactor , 2013 .

[21]  Iftekhar A. Karimi,et al.  Evaluation of utilization alternatives for stranded natural gas , 2012 .

[22]  Jacques Mettes,et al.  Design of an annular microchannel reactor (AMR) for hydrogen and/or syngas production via methane steam reforming , 2014 .

[23]  Eric D. Wetzel,et al.  Thermal Management in Catalytic Microreactors , 2006 .

[24]  Leonidas G. Bleris,et al.  Reduced order distributed boundary control of thermal transients in microsystems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[25]  Aristides Morillo,et al.  Heat-integrated reactor concepts for catalytic reforming and automotive exhaust purification , 2007 .

[26]  Yongchan Kim,et al.  Minimization of hot spot in a microchannel reactor for steam reforming of methane with the stripe combustion catalyst layer , 2013 .

[27]  Michael Baldea,et al.  Robust Autothermal Microchannel Reactors , 2014 .

[28]  S. Vaccaro,et al.  Catalytic Combustion for Supplying Energy for Endothermic Reaction , 2016 .

[29]  Siyun Wang,et al.  Temperature Control Applications of the Phase Transformations of Materials , 2013 .

[30]  Asterios Gavriilidis,et al.  Influence of Flow Arrangement in Catalytic Plate Reactors for Methane Steam Reforming , 2004 .

[31]  Dionisios G. Vlachos,et al.  High vs. low temperature reforming for hydrogen production via microtechnology , 2009 .

[32]  G. Froment,et al.  Methane steam reforming, methanation and water‐gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics , 1989 .

[33]  Yongchan Kim,et al.  Optimization of a counter-flow microchannel reactor using hydrogen assisted catalytic combustion for steam reforming of methane , 2014 .

[34]  Richard A. Dawe,et al.  Review of ways to transport natural gas energy from countries which do not need the gas for domestic use , 2003 .

[35]  Michael Baldea,et al.  Optimizing the catalyst distribution for countercurrent methane steam reforming in plate reactors , 2011 .

[36]  Laura J. Silva,et al.  Microchannel reactor architecture enables greener processes , 2010 .

[37]  Andrzej Stankiewicz,et al.  Opportunities and challenges for process control in process intensification , 2012 .

[38]  Michael Baldea,et al.  A thermal‐flywheel approach to distributed temperature control in microchannel reactors , 2013 .

[39]  Michael Baldea,et al.  Identification-based optimization of dynamical systems under uncertainty , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..