Optimization of the Bias Magnetic Field of Shear Wave EMATs

The main advantage of electromagnetic acoustic transducers (EMATs) over piezoelectric transducers is that no direct contact with the specimen under test is required. Therefore, EMATs can be used to test through coating layers. However, they produce weaker signals, and hence, their design has to be optimized. This paper focuses on the design of a Lorentz force shear wave EMAT and its application in thickness gaging; special emphasis is placed on the optimization of the design elements that correspond to the bias magnetic field of the EMAT. A configuration that consists of several magnets axisymmetrically arranged around a ferromagnetic core with like poles facing the core was found to give the best results. By using this configuration, magnetic flux densities in excess of 3 T were obtained in the surface of a specimen; the maximum value achieved by a single magnet under similar conditions is roughly 1.2 T. If the diameter of an EMAT ultrasonic aperture is 10 mm, the proposed configuration produces signals roughly 20 dB greater than a single magnet, while for a given overall EMAT volume, signals were greater than 3-6 dB. Linear and radial shear wave polarizations were also compared; a higher mode purity and signal intensity were obtained with the linear polarization.

[1]  S. Boonsang,et al.  A new magnetic configuration for a small in-plane electromagnetic acoustic transducer applied to laser-ultrasound measurements: Modelling and validation , 2006 .

[2]  Lei Kang,et al.  Research on influence of lorentz force mechanism on EMAT's transduction efficiency in steel plate , 2010, 2010 5th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications.

[3]  Anthony N. Sinclair,et al.  Optimal design of EMAT transmitters , 2004 .

[4]  P. Wilcox,et al.  The excitation and detection of Lamb waves with planar coil electromagnetic acoustic transducers , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  P. Nagy,et al.  The impact of magnetostriction on the transduction of normal bias field EMATs , 2012 .

[6]  Rachel S. Edwards,et al.  Shear wave generation using a spiral electromagnetic acoustic transducer , 2006 .

[7]  A. Wilbrand,et al.  EMUS-Probes for Bulk Waves and Rayleigh Waves. Model for Sound Field and Efficiency Calculations , 1983 .

[8]  Krishnan Balasubramaniam,et al.  Improving the signal amplitude of meandering coil EMATs by using ribbon soft magnetic flux concentrators (MFC). , 2011, Ultrasonics.

[9]  E. Roland Dobbs,et al.  Electromagnetic Generation of Ultrasonic Waves , 1973 .

[10]  Peter Cawley,et al.  Study and comparison of different EMAT configurations for SH wave inspection , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  Lei Kang,et al.  Characteristic research and analysis of EMAT's transduction efficiency for surface detection of aluminum plate , 2009, 2009 9th International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments.

[12]  Peter Cawley,et al.  Experimental and numerical evaluation of electromagnetic acoustic transducer performance on steel materials , 2012 .

[13]  Chun Li,et al.  Strong Permanent Magnet Dipole With Reduced Demagnetizing Effect , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[14]  Super strong permanent dipole magnet , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[15]  Prabhu Rajagopal,et al.  On the use of absorbing layers to simulate the propagation of elastic waves in unbounded isotropic media using commercially available Finite Element packages , 2012 .

[16]  Peter B. Nagy,et al.  Corrosion and erosion monitoring in plates and pipes using constant group velocity Lamb wave inspection. , 2014, Ultrasonics.

[17]  Matthias Seher,et al.  Numerical design optimization of an EMAT for A0 Lamb wave generation in steel plates , 2014 .

[18]  H. Ogi,et al.  EMATs for Science and Industry: Noncontacting Ultrasonic Measurements , 2010 .

[19]  Heng Zhang,et al.  Influence of coil parameters on transduction performance of unidirectional EMATs for Rayleigh wave , 2013, 2013 Far East Forum on Nondestructive Evaluation/Testing: New Technology and Application.

[20]  P. Cawley,et al.  Omnidirectional guided wave inspection of large metallic plate structures using an EMAT array , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[21]  Rachel S. Edwards,et al.  Effect on ultrasonic generation of a backplate in electromagnetic acoustic transducers , 2007 .

[22]  D. A. Hutchins,et al.  Application of pulse compression signal processing techniques to electromagnetic acoustic transducers for noncontact thickness measurements and imaging , 2005 .

[23]  R. Dewhurst,et al.  Modelling of magnetic fields to enhance the performance of an in-plane EMAT for laser-generated ultrasound. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[24]  R. B. Thompson.  Physical Principles of Measurements with EMAT Transducers , 1990 .

[25]  Development of high field permanent magnet , 2002 .