The Diagnostic Effect From Axial Loading of the Lumbar Spine During Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Degenerative Disorders

Study Design. Patients with low back pain, sciatica, and neurogenic claudication were observed during computed tomographic myelography or magnetic resonance imaging in psoas-relaxed position and axially compressed supine position of the lumbar spine. Objective. To estimate the clinical value of axially loaded imaging in patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine. Summary of Background Data. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging still are performed with the lumbar spine in a supine relaxed position, which results in unloading of the spine and enlargement of the canal. Methods. A device for axial loading of the lumbar spine in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging was used. Altogether, 172 patients were examined in psoas-relaxed position and axially compressed supine position of the lumbar spine: 50 patients with computed tomographic myelography and 122 patients with magnetic resonance imaging. If a significant decrease (>15 mm2) in the dural sac cross-sectional area to values smaller than 75 mm2 (the borderline value for stenosis) was found during examination in axial loading, or if a suspected disc herniation, narrow lateral recess, narrow intervertebral foramen, or intraspinal synovial cyst changed to being obvious at the axial loading examination, this was regarded as additional information important for the treatment. Results. Additional valuable information was found in 50 of 172 patients (29%) during examination in axial loading. In the different diagnostic groups, additional valuable information was found in 69% of the patients with neurogenic claudication, in 14% of the patients with sciatica, and in 0% of the patients with low back pain. The percentage of additional valuable information increased to 50% in the patients with sciatica, if recommended inclusion criteria for examinations in axial loading were used. A narrowing of the lateral recess causing compression of the nerve root was found at 42 levels in 35 patients at axial loading. Conclusion. According to the study results, axially loaded imaging adds frequent additional valuable information, as compared with conventional imaging methods, especially in patients with neurogenic claudication, but also in patients with sciatica if defined inclusion criteria are used.

[1]  K. Olmarker,et al.  Double‐level cauda equina compression: An experimental study with continuous monitoring of intraneural blood flow in the porcine cauda equina , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  T. Hansson,et al.  Pressure Changes following Constriction of the Cauda Equina: An Experimental Study In Situ , 1988, Spine.

[3]  A Benini,et al.  Lumbar spine: quantitative and qualitative assessment of positional (upright flexion and extension) MR imaging and myelography. , 1998, Radiology.

[4]  M. Zanetti,et al.  Positional MR imaging of the lumbar spine: does it demonstrate nerve root compromise not visible at conventional MR imaging? , 2000, Radiology.

[5]  D. Ward,et al.  Cauda Equina Dysfunction: The Significance of Two‐Level Pathology , 1992, Spine.

[6]  J Willén,et al.  Axially Loaded Magnetic Resonance Image of the Lumbar Spine in Asymptomatic Individuals , 2001, Spine.

[7]  S. Kikuchi,et al.  In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems. , 1999, Spine.

[8]  T. Hansson,et al.  Axial Loading of the Spine during CT and MR in Patients with Suspected Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 1998, Acta radiologica.

[9]  S. Wildermuth,et al.  Changes in cross-sectional measurements of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramina as a function of body position: in vivo studies on an open-configuration MR system. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  J. Wilmink,et al.  Biomechanics of Lumbosacral Dural Sac: A Study of Flexion-Extension Myelography , 1981, Spine.

[11]  L. Riley,et al.  Occult lumbar lateral spinal stenosis in neural foramina subjected to physiologic loading. , 1996, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[12]  C. Hamanishi,et al.  Cross-sectional area of the stenotic lumbar dural tube measured from the transverse views of magnetic resonance imaging. , 1994, Journal of spinal disorders.

[13]  B. Magnaes,et al.  Functional myelography with metrizamide in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. , 1977, Acta radiologica. Supplementum.

[14]  G. Elfström,et al.  Intravital dynamic pressure measurements in lumbar discs. A study of common movements, maneuvers and exercises. , 1970, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement.

[15]  D. Weinert,et al.  Biomechanical Aspects of the Subarachnoid Space and Cervical Cord in Healthy Individuals Examined With Kinematic Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1998, Spine.

[16]  M. Abdelnoor,et al.  Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Clinical and Radiologic Features , 1995 .

[17]  H. Mehdorn,et al.  Kinematic MR Imaging in Surgical Management of Cervical Disc Disease, Spondylosis and Spondylotic Myelopathy , 1999, Acta radiologica.

[18]  D. Spengler,et al.  Role of computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of central spinal stenosis. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  T. Hansson,et al.  Dynamic Effects on the Lumbar Spinal Canal: Axially Loaded CT‐Myelography and MRI in Patients With Sciatica and/or Neurogenic Claudication , 1997, Spine.

[20]  K. Olmarker,et al.  Spinal nerve root compression. Nutrition and function of the porcine cauda equina compressed in vivo. , 1991, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[21]  T. Hansson,et al.  Dynamic changes in the dimensions of the lumbar spinal canal: An experimental study in vitro , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[22]  A. Saifuddin,et al.  The imaging of lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2000, Clinical radiology.

[23]  J. Wilmink,et al.  Posture-dependent Bilateral Compression of L4 or L5 Nerve Roots in Facet Hypertrophy: A Dynamic CT-myelographic Study , 1987, Spine.

[24]  E. Hansen,et al.  Two‐Level Spinal Stenosis in Minipigs: Hemodynamic Effects of Exercise , 1995, Spine.

[25]  A. Hargens,et al.  Lumbar Spine Disc Height and Curvature Responses to an Axial Load Generated by a Compression Device Compatible with Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, Spine.