Enabling precision coordinate metrology for universal optical testing and alignment applications

Abstract. Optical designs for the next generation space science instruments call for unconventional, aspheric, and freeform (FF), prescriptions with tight tolerances. These advanced surfaces enable superior-performance, compact, and lower cost systems but are more challenging to characterize and, hence, to fabricate and integrate. A method was developed to characterize a wide range of optical surfaces, without requiring custom-made correctors, and to align them to each other for a high-performance optical system. A precision coordinate measuring machine, equipped with a non-contact, chromatic confocal probe, was used to measure numerous optics including large convex conics, high-sloped aspherics, several FF surfaces, and grazing-incidence x-ray optics. The resulting data were successfully reduced using custom-developed, advanced surface fitting analysis tool, to determine the optic’s alignment relative to the global and local coordinate systems, surface departure from design, and the as-built optical prescription. This information guided the modeling and the alignment of the corresponding as-built optical systems, including a flight system composed of a three-mirror anastigmat.

[1]  Bastien Béchadergue,et al.  Freeform geometrical optics II: from parametric representation to CAD/CAM. , 2019, Applied optics.

[2]  nasa The Hubble Space Telescope optical systems failure report , 2019 .

[3]  Kai-Wing Chan,et al.  High-resolution, lightweight, and low-cost x-ray optics for the Lynx observatory , 2019, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems.

[4]  William W. Zhang,et al.  Lynx X-Ray Observatory: an overview , 2019, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems.

[5]  Lee D. Feinberg,et al.  Optical budgeting for LUVOIR , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[6]  Andrew Jones,et al.  The large UV/optical/infrared surveyor (LUVOIR): decadal mission study update , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[7]  Marshall W. Bautz,et al.  The high definition x-ray imager (HDXI) instrument on the Lynx X-ray Surveyor , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[8]  Jessica A. Gaskin,et al.  The Lynx X-ray Observatory: concept study overview and status , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[9]  Karen E. Gelmis,et al.  Lynx Mission concept status , 2017, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[10]  M. Dougherty Cassini the grand finale , 2017 .

[11]  P. J. Schinder,et al.  Composite infrared spectrometer (CIRS) on Cassini: publisher's note. , 2017, Applied optics.

[12]  Joseph M. Howard,et al.  Freeform Optics at NASA , 2015 .

[13]  Martin C. Weisskopf Chandra x-ray optics , 2012 .

[14]  W. W. Zhang,et al.  Design and fabrication of refractive nulls for testing the segmented mirrors of the Constellation-X spectroscopy x-ray telescope (SXT) , 2005, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[15]  R. Parks Hubble Space Telescope secondary mirror vertex radius/conic constant test , 1991 .

[16]  Manoj Kumar,et al.  Performance evaluations. , 1989, Nurse managers' bookshelf.

[17]  Harvey Tananbaum The Advanced X‐Ray Astrophysics Facility a , 1986 .