Automatic graphical abstraction in intent-based 3D-illustrations

The purpose of this paper is to present models, methods and techniques to control automatically the degree of details in graphics or animation in an intelligent way. Instead of just aiming at the technical advantages of such a reduction (i.e. saving computer memory and computational load), this work focuses on clarifying the intention of graphics or animation with the means of abstraction. The goal is to direct the viewer's attention to relevant parts of the graphics, without using metaobjects or - colours (e.g. arrows, blinking objects etc.) and to reduce the probability of distracting the viewer's attention by unimportant details.The paper describes the major problems of this task and provides a knowledge-based solution to yield an intelligent control of the level of detail, improving the expressivity of the graphics or animation and saving computational resources at the same time. To emphasize the plausibility of these ideas the graphical abstraction system ARP is presented and its results are discussed.

[1]  Andreas Butz,et al.  Anymation with CATHI , 1997, AAAI 1997.

[2]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Automated generation of intent-based 3D Illustrations , 1991, SIGGRAPH.

[3]  Thomas Rist,et al.  AWI: a workbench for semi-automated illustration design , 1994, AVI '94.

[4]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Jarek Rossignac,et al.  Multi-resolution 3D approximations for rendering complex scenes , 1993, Modeling in Computer Graphics.

[6]  Hugues Hoppe,et al.  Progressive meshes , 1996, SIGGRAPH.

[7]  Elisabeth André,et al.  Ein planbasierter Ansatz zur Generierung multimedialer Präsentationen , 1995, DISKI.

[8]  Andreas Butz,et al.  Zur Auswahl von Abstraktionsgraden , 1997, SimVis.

[9]  Thomas Rist,et al.  Wissensbasierte Verfahren für den automatischen Entwurf von Gebrauchsgraphik in der technischen Dokumentation , 1996, DISKI.

[10]  Andreas Butz,et al.  Lean Modeling : The Intelligent Use of Geometrical Abstraction in 3D Animations , 1996, ECAI.

[11]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Apex: An Experiment in the Automated Creation of Pictorial Explanations , 1985, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[12]  U. Neisser Decision-time without reaction-time: Experiments in visual scanning. , 1963 .

[13]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Perception, Attention, and Resources: A Decision-Theoretic Approach to Graphics Rendering , 1997, UAI.

[14]  John Lansdown,et al.  Expressive rendering: a review of nonphotorealistic techniques , 1995, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[15]  K. Feiner,et al.  Anymation with CATHI , 1997 .

[16]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  Simplification envelopes , 1996, SIGGRAPH.

[17]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[19]  Antonio Krüger,et al.  PROXIMA : ein System zur Generierung graphischer Abstraktionen , 1995 .

[20]  Wolfgang Leister Computer Generated Copper Plates , 1994, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[21]  J. Jonides Further toward a model of the Mind’s eye’s movement , 1983 .

[22]  Tony Lindeberg,et al.  Scale-Space Theory in Computer Vision , 1993, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[23]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.