Validation of the IRI-2012 model with GPS-based ground observation over a low-latitude Singapore station

The ionospheric total electron content (TEC) in the low-latitude Singapore region (geographic latitude 01.37° N, longitude, 103.67° E, geomagnetic latitude 8.5° S) for 2010 to 2011 was retrieved using the data from global positioning system (GPS)-based measurements. The observed TEC from GPS is compared with those derived from the latest International Reference Ionosphere (IRI)-2012 model with three options, IRI-Nequick (IRI-Neq), IRI-2001, and IRI-01-Corr, for topside electron density. The results showed that the IRI-Neq and IRI-01-Corr models are in good agreement with GPS-TEC values at all times, in all seasons, for the year 2010. For the year 2011, these two models showed agreement at all times with GPS-TEC only for the summer season, and for the period 11:00 to 24:00 UT hours (19:00 to 24:00 LT and 00:00 to 08:00 LT) during the winter and equinox seasons. The IRI-2012 model electron density profile showed agreement with constellation observing system for meteorology, ionosphere, and climate (COSMIC) radio occultation (RO)-based measurements around 250 to 300 km and was found to be independent of the options for topside density profiles. However, above 300 km, the IRI-2012 model electron density profile does not show agreement with COSMIC measurements. The observations (COSMIC and GPS) and IRI-2012-based data of TEC and electron density profiles were also analyzed during quiet and storm periods. The analysis showed that the IRI model does not represent the impact of storms, while observations show the impact of storms on the low-latitude ionosphere. This suggests that significant improvements in the IRI model are required for estimating behavior during storms, particularly in low-latitude regions.

[1]  A. Richmond.  Space weather research prompts study of ionosphere and upper atmospheric electrodynamics , 1996 .

[2]  Jann‐Yenq Liu,et al.  Theoretical study of the low- and midlatitude ionospheric electron density enhancement during the October 2003 superstorm: Relative importance of the neutral wind and the electric field , 2005 .

[3]  Kristine M. Larson,et al.  Global Positioning System, Theory and Practice, 5th Edition , 2001 .

[4]  Shweta Sharma,et al.  Study of simultaneous penetration of electric fields and variation of total electron content in the day and night sectors during the geomagnetic storm of 23 May 2002 , 2011 .

[5]  Dale N. Anderson,et al.  Dynamics of the low-latitude thermosphere: Quiet and disturbed conditions , 1997 .

[6]  B. Fejer.  The equatorial ionospheric electric fields. A review , 1981 .

[7]  S. K. Mitra,et al.  Ionospheric total electron content (TEC) studies with GPS in the equatorial region , 2007 .

[8]  O. J. Olwendo,et al.  Comparison of GPS TEC measurements with IRI-2007 TEC prediction over the Kenyan region during the descending phase of solar cycle 23 , 2012 .

[9]  N. Sethi,et al.  Performance of IRI model predictions of F-region for Indian latitudes , 1996 .

[10]  Dieter Bilitza,et al.  International reference ionosphere , 1978 .

[11]  Akshay K. Singh,et al.  Storm time response of GPS-derived total electron content (TEC) during low solar active period at Indian low latitude station Varanasi , 2011 .

[12]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Variation of ionospheric total electron content in Indian low latitude region of the equatorial anomaly during May 2007-April 2008 , 2009 .

[13]  B. Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Global Positioning System , 1992 .

[14]  Bodo W. Reinisch,et al.  Electron density profiles in the equatorial ionosphere observed by the FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC and a digisonde at Jicamarca , 2009 .

[15]  K. Cheng,et al.  On the equatorial anomaly of the ionospheric total electron content near the northern anomaly crest region , 1989 .

[16]  Ying-Hwa Kuo,et al.  Comparison of COSMIC ionospheric measurements with ground-based observations and model predictions : Preliminary results , 2007 .

[17]  D. Prasad,et al.  Temporal and spatial variations in TEC using simultaneous measurements from the Indian GPS network of receivers during the low solar activity period of 2004-2005 , 2006 .

[18]  Ludger Scherliess,et al.  Empirical models of storm time equatorial zonal electric fields , 1997 .

[19]  M. Aggarwal.  TEC variability near northern EIA crest and comparison with IRI model , 2011 .

[20]  G. J. Bailey,et al.  The Sheffield University plasmasphere ionosphere model--a review , 1997 .

[21]  O. P. Singh,et al.  A morphological study of GPS-TEC data at Agra and their comparison with the IRI model , 2010 .

[22]  L. Scherliess,et al.  Time dependent response of equatorial ionospheric electric fields to magnetospheric disturbances , 1995 .

[23]  R. Moffett,et al.  Effect of Ionization Transport on the Equatorial F-Region , 1965, Nature.

[24]  David N. Anderson,et al.  A semi‐empirical low‐latitude ionospheric model , 1987 .

[25]  F. T. Berkey,et al.  Comparisons of GPS/MET retrieved ionospheric electron density and ground based ionosonde data , 2001 .

[26]  R. Ezquer,et al.  IRI-95 TEC predictions for the South American peak of the equatorial anomaly , 1998 .

[27]  M. A. Abdu,et al.  Major phenomena of the equatorial ionosphere-thermosphere system under disturbed conditions , 1997 .

[28]  Richard B. Langley,et al.  The Low-latitude Ionosphere: Monitoring its Behaviour with GPS , 2001 .

[29]  L. Brown,et al.  Prism: A parameterized real-time ionospheric specification model, version 1.5. Final report, 19 February 1992-31 March 1995 , 1995 .

[30]  K. Venkatesh,et al.  Vertical electron density and topside effective scale height ( H T ) variations over the Indian equatorial and low latitude stations , 2011 .

[31]  John A. Klobuchar,et al.  Design and characteristics of the GPS ionospheric time delay algorithm for single frequency users , 1986 .

[32]  M. A. Abdu,et al.  Equatorial ionosphere–thermosphere system: Electrodynamics and irregularities , 2005 .

[33]  D. Bilitza,et al.  International Reference Ionosphere 2007: Improvements and new parameters , 2008 .

[34]  Robert W. Schunk,et al.  Utah State University Global Assimilation of Ionospheric Measurements Gauss‐Markov Kalman filter model of the ionosphere: Model description and validation , 2006 .

[35]  P. K. Purohit,et al.  Seasonal variation of total electron content at crest of equatorial anomaly station during low solar activity conditions , 2010 .

[36]  Jann‐Yenq Liu,et al.  A comparison of a model using the FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC data with the IRI model , 2012, Earth, Planets and Space.

[37]  B. Wilson,et al.  A New Method for Monitoring the Earth's Ionospheric Total Electron Content Using the GPS Global Network , 1993 .

[38]  Sandro M. Radicella,et al.  A new version of the NeQuick ionosphere electron density model , 2008 .

[39]  Mala S. Bagiya,et al.  TEC variations during low solar activity period (2005–2007) near the Equatorial Ionospheric Anomaly Crest region in India , 2009 .

[40]  J. Chau,et al.  Equatorial Ionospheric Electric Fields During the November 2004 Magnetic Storm , 2007 .

[41]  A. K. Singh,et al.  GPS-TEC variations during low solar activity period (2007–2009) at Indian low latitude stations , 2012 .

[42]  W. H. Tsai,et al.  Improvement of GPS/MET Ionospheric Profiling and Validation Using the Chung-Li Ionosonde Measurements and the IRI model , 2004 .