Moment-rotation response of nominally pinned beam-to-column joints for frames of pultruded fibre reinforced polymer

This paper presents the test results to characterise the moment-rotation response of nominally pinned joints in frames of pultruded shapes. Mimicking conventional steel construction the major-axis beam-to-column joints are formed using pultruded FRP web cleats having steel bolting. There are two joint configurations with either a single row of three or two bolts per cleat leg. Testing is conducted on nominally identical specimens to statistically quantify the key joint properties. The average stiffness of all joints at damage onset is found to be 50% more variable than the average moment resistance. The presence of 70% difference between the minimum and maximum initial stiffness measured makes a single specimen measurement for stiffness unsuitable for frame analysis. The initial stiffness of the two joint configurations classifies them to be nominally pinned. No appreciable difference in characteristics for the three and two bolt configurations is found; the middle-bolt is unnecessary as two bolts give same results. The most important finding is that delamination cracks, at the top of the FRP cleats, could initiate before the mid-span vertical deflection of a simply supported beam with uniformly distributed load exceeds span/340.

[1]  C. Cooper,et al.  Characterisation of the short term static moment - rotation response of bolted connections between pultruded GRP beam and column WF-sections. , 1996 .

[2]  Chanakya Arya,et al.  Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures , 2018, Design of Structural Elements.

[3]  Lawrence C. Bank,et al.  Design and Performance of Connections for Pultruded Frame Structures , 1994 .

[4]  L. Bank.  Composites for Construction: Structural Design with FRP Materials , 2006 .

[5]  Yang Zheng,et al.  FURTHER TESTS OF BEAM-TO-COLUMN CONNECTIONS FOR PULTRUDED FRAMES: FLANGE-CLEATED , 1999 .

[6]  R. P. Johnson,et al.  General rules and rules for buildings , 2004 .

[7]  Ayman S. Mosallam,et al.  Performance of Pultruded FRP Connections under Static and Dynamic Loads , 1994 .

[8]  J. Toby Mottram.  Does Performance Based Design with Fibre Reinforced Polymer Components and Structures provide any new Benefits and Challenges , 2011 .

[9]  Carl-Alexander Graubner,et al.  Eurocode 0 - Grundlagen der Tragwerksplanung / Eurocode 0 - basis of structural design , 2011 .

[10]  J. T. Mottram,et al.  State-of-the-art review on the design of beam-to-column connections for pultruded frames , 1996 .

[11]  Geoffrey Turvey,et al.  Review of tests on bolted joints between pultruded GRP profiles , 2004 .

[12]  Ayman S. Mosallam,et al.  Design Guide for FRP Composite Connections , 2011 .

[13]  Geoffrey Turvey.  Flexure of pultruded GRP beams with semi-rigid end connections. , 1999 .

[14]  J. Toby Mottram,et al.  Design guidance for bolted connections in structures ofpultruded shapes: gaps in knowledge , 2009 .

[15]  J. Clarke.  Structural design of polymer composites : EUROCOMP design code and handbook , 1996 .

[16]  C. Cooper,et al.  Semi-rigid pultruded GRP frame connections: tests to determine static moment-rotation characteristics. , 1996 .

[17]  L. C. Bank,et al.  Beam-To-Column Connections for Pultruded FRP Structures , 1990 .

[18]  André Picard.  Guide to design criteria for bolted and riveted joints , 1988 .

[19]  Branko E. Gorenc,et al.  Steel Designers' Handbook , 2005 .

[20]  Geoffrey Turvey.  Analysis of pultruded glass reinforced plastic beams with semi-rigid end connections. , 1997 .

[21]  Geoffrey Turvey,et al.  Moment – rotation tests on bolted end connections in pultruded GRP beams – tests with stainless steel cleata and an assessment of their performance relative to GRP cleats. , 2000 .