Information Technology, Cross-Channel Capabilities, and Managerial Actions: Evidence from the Apparel Industry

Information technology (IT) has changed the dynamics of competition in the U.S. economy. Firms are gaining competitive advantage by competing on technology-enabled processes. For the retail industry, technology is breaking down the barriers between different retail channels and is making omnichannel retailing inevitable – an integrated sales experience that melds touch and-feel information in the physical world with online content. Omnichannel retailing is becoming a trend, critical for the success of retailers. To keep up the pace of change, existing retailers will need to create an omnichannel strategy and develop more omnichannel innovations. Based on the theories of resource-based view (RBV), IT business value, and competitive dynamics, this study examines the factors that affect cross-channel capabilities and managerial actions in the U.S. apparel industry. We have collected a longitudinal dataset on public apparel companies from 1995 to 2007. The empirical results reveal that both the quantity and scope of investments in enterprise IT applications are positively related to cross-channel capabilities. Financial resources positively moderate the relationship between enterprise IT applications and cross-channel capabilities. We find that enterprise IT applications increase the frequency and broaden the types of managerial actions. The effects of cross-channel capabilities on managerial actions are mixed. While market-oriented capabilities such as e-commerce and multi-channel cross-selling capabilities broaden the types of managerial actions, operation-oriented capabilities, such as cross-channel fulfillment, narrow the range of a firm’s managerial actions. The findings of the study provide important implications for managers in apparel and other retail sectors.

[1]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  Digital Systems, Partnership Networks, and Competition: The Co-Evolution of IOS Use and Network Position as Antecedents of Competitive Action , 2008, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[2]  Danny Miller,et al.  SOURCES AND CONSEQUENCES OF COMPETITIVE INERTIA: A STUDY OF THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY. , 1994 .

[3]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[4]  W. H. C.,et al.  Business Economics , 1926, Nature.

[5]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Dynamics of Competitive Strategy , 1992 .

[6]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[7]  Curtis M. Grimm,et al.  Strategy as action : industry rivalry and coordination , 1997 .

[8]  David J. Collis,et al.  Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities? , 1994 .

[9]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[10]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  Online/In-Store Integration and Customer Retention , 2005 .

[11]  Milton Harris,et al.  Organization Design , 2000, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization , 1990 .

[13]  G. Stalk,et al.  Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[14]  Ursula Y. Sullivan,et al.  Managing Marketing Communications with Multichannel Customers , 2005 .

[15]  Walter J. Ferrier,et al.  Competitive Dynamics Research , 2017 .

[16]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[17]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[18]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  That Makes a Competitive Difference , 2008 .

[19]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  H. Teo,et al.  The effects of retail channel integration through the use of information technologies on firm performance , 2012 .

[21]  R. Veliyath.  Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering , 1996 .

[22]  Julie Lewis,et al.  Drivers and Technology-Related Obstacles in Moving to Multichannel Retailing , 2014, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[23]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[24]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[25]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[26]  Raj Sharman,et al.  Impact of meta-analytic decisions on the conclusions drawn on the business value of information technology , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[27]  Danny Miller,et al.  The simplicity of competitive repertoires : An empirical analysis , 1996 .

[28]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS RESEARCH: CRITIQUE AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 2002 .

[29]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[30]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[31]  E. Ofek,et al.  Diversification's effect on firm value , 1995 .

[32]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta - Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm - Level Empirical Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  V. Kumar,et al.  Who are the multichannel shoppers and how do they perform?: Correlates of multichannel shopping behavior , 2005 .

[34]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[35]  Daniel Goersch,et al.  Multi-channel Integration And Its Implications For Retail Web Sites , 2002, ECIS.

[36]  Nils Stieglitz,et al.  Innovations and the Role of Complementarities in a Strategic Theory of the Firm , 2007 .

[37]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[38]  Hiroyuki Itami.  Mobilizing invisible assets , 1987 .

[39]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Information Technology, Network Structure, and Competitive Action , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  N. Ravishanker,et al.  Multichannel Shopping: Causes and Consequences , 2007 .

[41]  Walter J. Ferrier.  Navigating the Competitive Landscape: The Drivers and Consequences of Competitive Aggressiveness , 2001 .

[42]  Weiguo Fan,et al.  Competitive Actions and Dynamics in the Digital Age: An Empirical Investigation of Social Networking Firms , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Organizational Information Processing, Competitive Responses, and Performance in the U.S. Domestic Airline Industry , 1991 .

[44]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Product-Market Diversification and Market Power , 1985 .

[45]  Santiago Gallino,et al.  How to win in an Omnichannel world , 2014 .

[46]  Jacquelyn S. Thomas,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities in Multichannel Customer Management , 2006 .

[47]  Max Chen.  Competitor analysis and interfirm riva-lry: toward a theoretical integration , 1996 .

[48]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Issues in Linking Information Technology Capability to Firm Performance , 2003, MIS Q..

[50]  Walter J. Ferrier,et al.  The Role of Competitive Action in Market Share Erosion and Industry Dethronement: A Study of Industry Leaders and Challengers , 1999 .

[51]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[52]  Jeff K. Stratman.  Realizing Benefits from Enterprise Resource Planning: Does Strategic Focus Matter? , 2007 .

[53]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: Contradictory Findings and Their Possible Causes , 2014, MIS Q..

[54]  W. D. Perreault,et al.  Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments , 1989 .

[55]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  “Austrian” and Industrial Organization Perspectives on Firm-level Competitive Activity and Performance , 1996 .

[56]  Madhumita Banerjee,et al.  Misalignment and Its Influence on Integration Quality in Multichannel Services , 2014 .

[57]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[58]  J. Schumpeter.  The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[59]  David A. Belsley,et al.  Regression Analysis and its Application: A Data-Oriented Approach.@@@Applied Linear Regression.@@@Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity , 1981 .

[60]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Speed, Stealth, and Selective Attack: How Small Firms Differ From Large Firms in Competitive Behavior , 1995 .

[61]  Michael R. Wade,et al.  The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions for Future Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[62]  Inge Geyskens,et al.  How Cannibalistic is the Internet Channel , 2002 .

[63]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[64]  Curtis M. Grimm,et al.  The impact of market actions on firm reputation , 2006 .

[65]  Mikko A. Junttila,et al.  A resource-based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance , 2002 .