Gingival Biotype Assessement: Visual Inspection Relevance And Maxillary Versus Mandibular Comparison

Objective: This clinical study was aimed at evaluating the accuracy of gingival visual inspection procedures during clinical examination and determining whether differences existed between the maxillary and mandibular gingival biotypes. Materials and Methods: The study included 53 patients and 124 clinicians. The clinicians were asked to assign to each subject, using photographic documents, one of three biotypes: thin-scalloped, thick-scalloped, or thick-flat gingival biotype. A total of 19716 responses were collected for statistical analysis. Results: Identification accuracy of the gingival biotype and the intra-examiner repeatability presented poor highlighting of the limited relevance of visual inspection. In addition, the percent of agreement between classifications based on the global view of both the maxilla and mandible and the classification based on the individual mandibular or maxillary anterior teeth was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Based on the above results, it can be concluded that a simple visual inspection is not effective for the identification of gingival biotype. Furthermore, evidence suggests that a difference of biotype between the maxilla and the mandible in the same patient is conceivable. Therefore, orthodontic clinical examination should incorporate a reproducible method of determining the individualized gingival biotype for each group of teeth that will be moved.

[1]  Kitichai Rungcharassaeng,et al.  Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement. , 2010, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[2]  Nikolaos Tatarakis,et al.  Tissue biotype and its relation to the underlying bone morphology. , 2010, Journal of periodontology.

[3]  H. De Bruyn,et al.  The gingival biotype assessed by experienced and inexperienced clinicians. , 2009, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[4]  Jan Cosyn,et al.  The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. , 2009, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[5]  Maurício Barriviera,et al.  Soft tissue cone-beam computed tomography: a novel method for the measurement of gingival tissue and the dimensions of the dentogingival unit. , 2008, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[6]  K. Witter,et al.  Gingival Thickness in Dogs: Association with Age, Gender, and Dental Arch Location , 2008, Journal of veterinary dentistry.

[7]  M. Erkan,et al.  Gingival response to mandibular incisor intrusion. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[8]  E. Zenóbio,et al.  Periodontal status of mandibular central incisors after orthodontic proclination in adults. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[9]  K L Vandana,et al.  Thickness of gingiva in association with age, gender and dental arch location. , 2005, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[10]  B. Melsen,et al.  Factors of importance for the development of dehiscences during labial movement of mandibular incisors: a retrospective study of adult orthodontic patients. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[11]  A. Heinecke,et al.  Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes. , 2000, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[12]  A. Heinecke,et al.  Ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness. Subject variation and influence of tooth type and clinical features. , 1996, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[13]  J. Wennström Mucogingival considerations in orthodontic treatment. , 1996, Seminars in orthodontics.

[14]  J. Lindhe,et al.  On the relationship between crown form and clinical features of the gingiva in adolescents. , 1993, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[15]  M. Ercan,et al.  Blood flow to human gingiva measured by the 133Xe clearance technique. , 1992, The Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry.

[16]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Periodontal characteristics in individuals with varying form of the upper central incisors. , 1991, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[17]  A. Holthuis,et al.  Observations on temperature and temperature patterns of the gingiva. I. The effect of arch, region and health. , 1983, Journal of periodontology.

[18]  J. Maynard,et al.  Diagnosis and management of mucogingival problems in children. , 1980, Dental clinics of North America.

[19]  Maynard Jg,et al.  Diagnosis and management of mucogingival problems in children. , 1980 .