PURPOSE
The aim of this work was to characterize a multi-axis ion chamber array (IC PROFILER; Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL, USA) that has the potential to simplify the acquisition of LINAC beam data.
METHODS
The IC PROFILER (or panel) measurement response was characterized with respect to radiation beam properties, including dose, dose per pulse, pulse rate frequency (PRF), and energy. Panel properties were also studied, including detector-calibration stability, power-on time, backscatter dependence, and the panel's agreement with water tank measurements [profiles, fractional depth dose (FDD), and output factors].
RESULTS
The panel's relative deviation was typically within (+/-) 1% of an independent (or nominal) response for all properties that were tested. Notable results were (a) a detectable relative field shape change of approximately 1% with linear accelerator PRF changes; (b) a large range in backscatter thickness had a minimal effect on the measured dose distribution (typically less than 1%); (c) the error spread in profile comparison between the panel and scanning water tank (Blue Phantom, CC13; IBA Schwarzenbruck, DE) was approximately (+/-) 0.75%.
CONCLUSIONS
The ability of the panel to accurately reproduce water tank profiles, FDDs, and output factors is an indication of its abilities as a dosimetry system. The benefits of using the panel versus a scanning water tank are less setup time and less error susceptibility. The same measurements (including device setup and breakdown) for both systems took 180 min with the water tank versus 30 min with the panel. The time-savings increase as the measurement load is increased.
[1]
R J Watts.
Evaluation of a diode detector array for use as a linear accelerator QC device.
,
1998,
Medical physics.
[2]
M. Oldham,et al.
Evaluation of a 2D diode array for IMRT quality assurance.
,
2004,
Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[3]
D. Rogers,et al.
AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
,
1999,
Medical physics.
[4]
Darren Kahler,et al.
Wide field array calibration dependence on the stability of measured dose distributions.
,
2010,
Medical physics.
[5]
G. Knoll.
Radiation detection and measurement
,
1979
.
[6]
T. Zhu,et al.
Performance evaluation of a diode array for enhanced dynamic wedge dosimetry.
,
1997,
Medical physics.
[7]
Timothy C Zhu,et al.
Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: Report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM.
,
2008,
Medical physics.