Climate Change and Floodplain Management in the United States

Federal agencies use flood frequency estimates to delineate flood risk, manage the National Flood Insurance Program, and ensure that Federal programs are economically efficient. The assumption behind traditional flood risk analysis is that climate is stationary, but anthropogenic climate change and better knowledge of interdecadal climate variability challenge the validity of the assumption. This paper reviews several alternative statistical models for flood risk estimation that do not assume climate stationarity. Some models require subjective judgement or presuppose an understanding of the causes of the underlying non-stationarity, which is problematic given our current knowledge of the interaction of climate and floods. Although currently out of favor, hydrometeorological models have been used for engineering design as alternatives to statistical models and could be adapted to different climate conditions. Floodplain managers should recognize the potentially greater uncertainty in flood risk estimation due to climate change and variability and try to incorporate the uncertainties into floodplain management decision-making and regulation.

[1]  R. Pielke,et al.  Vulnerability and Risk: Some Thoughts from a Political and Policy Perspective , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Otis Williams.  Engineering and Design. Hydrologic Engineering Requirements for Reservoirs , 1997 .

[3]  Jery R. Stedinger,et al.  Climate Variability and Flood-Risk Management , 2001 .

[4]  Jery R. Stedinger,et al.  CLIMATE VARIABILITY AND FLOOD FREQUENCY ESTIMATION FOR THE UPPER MISSISSIPPI AND LOWER MISSOURI RIVERS 1 , 1999 .

[5]  Harry F. Lins,et al.  Streamflow trends in the United States , 1999 .

[6]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972 .

[7]  Thomas R. Karl,et al.  Trends in high-frequency climate variability in the twentieth century , 1995, Nature.

[8]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[9]  Eugene Z. Stakhiv,et al.  Water Resources Planning Principles and Evaluation Criteria for Climate Change: Summary and Conclusions , 1997 .

[10]  A. Sankarasubramanian,et al.  Flood quantiles in a changing climate: Seasonal forecasts and causal relations , 2003 .

[11]  Eugene Z. Stakhiv,et al.  Policy implications of climate change impacts on water resources management , 1998 .

[12]  Gregory J. McCabe,et al.  ESTIMATES OF RUNOFF USING WATER‐BALANCE AND ATMOSPHERIC GENERAL CIRCULATION MODELS 1 , 1999 .

[13]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  Extreme Events: A Research and Policy Framework for Disasters in Context , 2001 .

[14]  Thomas R. Karl,et al.  Heavy Precipitation and High Streamflow in the Contiguous United States: Trends in the Twentieth Century. , 2001 .

[15]  Upmanu Lall,et al.  Magnitude and timing of annual maximum floods: Trends and large‐scale climatic associations for the Blacksmith Fork River, Utah , 2000 .

[16]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  Precipitation and Damaging Floods: Trends in the United States, 1932-97 , 2000 .

[17]  Gregory J. McCabe,et al.  A step increase in streamflow in the conterminous United States , 2002 .

[18]  Kevin E. Trenberth,et al.  Conceptual Framework for Changes of Extremes of the Hydrological Cycle with Climate Change , 1999 .

[19]  Wilbert O. Thomas,et al.  A Uniform Technique for Flood Frequency Analysis , 1985 .

[20]  Raymond J. Burby,et al.  The Effects of Floodplain Development Controls on Residential Land Values , 1990 .

[21]  Richard M. Vogel,et al.  Trends in floods and low flows in the United States: impact of spatial correlation , 2000 .

[22]  P. W. Strike,et al.  Forecasting and control , 1991 .

[23]  Benjamin S. Felzer,et al.  PRECIPITATION DIFFERENCES AMONGST GCMs USED FOR THE U.S. NATIONAL ASSESSMENT 1 , 1999 .

[24]  Thomas R. Karl,et al.  Secular Trends of Precipitation Amount, Frequency, and Intensity in the United States , 1998 .

[25]  James H. Lambert,et al.  DYNAMIC MODELS FOR FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT , 2000 .

[26]  Vincent R. Gray.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[27]  Nicholas E. Flores,et al.  Market Failure in Information: The National Flood Insurance Program , 2002, Land Economics.

[28]  N. Matalas.  Stochastic Hydrology in the Context of Climate Change , 1997 .

[29]  William B Lord,et al.  Flood Hazard Delineation: The One Percent Standard , 1994 .

[30]  Larry Larson,et al.  No Adverse Impact: New Direction in Floodplain Management Policy , 2001 .

[31]  C. V. Anderson,et al.  The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) , 2002 .

[32]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Paying the price : the status and role of insurance against natural disasters in the United States , 2000 .

[33]  David R. Easterling,et al.  Long-Term Trends in Extreme Precipitation Events over the Conterminous United States and Canada , 1999 .

[34]  N. Matalas,et al.  Analysis of Trends and Persistence in Hydrologic Records , 2001 .

[35]  David R. Easterling,et al.  Contemporary Changes of the Hydrological Cycle over the Contiguous United States: Trends Derived from In Situ Observations , 2004 .

[36]  B. Hobbs,et al.  Using Decision Analysis to Include Climate Change in Water Resources Decision Making , 1997 .

[37]  Thresholds and Response to Climate Change Forcing: The Water Sector , 2000 .