Toward More Comprehensive Chinese Internet Users’ Studies: Translation and Validation of the Chinese–Mandarin Version of the 8-Item Information Retrieval on the Web Self-Efficacy Scale (Ch-IROWSE)

ABSTRACT In this article, we fill a dearth in the literature of Internet self-efficacy (ISS) measurement. We introduce the translation and validation of the Chinese-Mandarin version of the 8-item Information Retrieval On the Web Self-Efficacy scale (IROWSE scale), which has been originally developed in the French language (Rodon & Meyer, 2017). After back-forward translation procedure and content clarity, we ran a test of this new version. We checked the intrinsic psychometric properties including reliability, factor structure (CFA), and criterion-related validity regarding skills for retrieving information on the Web, general attitude toward the Web, experience, gender, and age. Assessment of construct validity indicated, as expected, a one-factor model for the eight items (with coefficient alpha equal to 0.90). Its sum-scores were not confounded with skill levels or general attitudes, and it founds its sources in direct experiences. Furthermore, research would take into account the Internet World population more broadly beyond the West with this new version.

[1]  Aurélie Dommes,et al.  Strategy and accuracy during information search on the Web: Effects of age and complexity of the search questions , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Tom Kelleher,et al.  Papayas and pedagogy: geographically dispersed teams and Internet self-efficacy , 2002 .

[3]  Wen-Hua Ren,et al.  Library instruction and college student self-efficacy in electronic information searching , 2000 .

[4]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[5]  Thierry Mever,et al.  Trouver sur Internet une réponse à une question , 2004 .

[6]  Gabriele Oettingen,et al.  Self-efficacy in Changing Societies: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-efficacy , 1995 .

[7]  Per Carlbring,et al.  Internet vs. paper and pencil administration of questionnaires commonly used in panic/agoraphobia research , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  R. Brislin.  The wording and translation of research instruments. , 1986 .

[9]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  Tino Fenech,et al.  Web retailing adoption: exploring the nature of internet users Web retailing behaviour , 2003 .

[11]  Yvonne Kammerer,et al.  The Role of Search Result Position and Source Trustworthiness in the Selection of Web Search Results When Using a List or a Grid Interface , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Cindy D. Kam,et al.  Students as Experimental Participants: A Defense of the "Narrow Data Base" (WP-09-05) , 2009 .

[13]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  University students' self‐efficacy and their attitudes toward the Internet: the role of students' perceptions of the Internet , 2006 .

[14]  R. Hambleton,et al.  Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment , 2004 .

[15]  Jiaming Fang,et al.  Bibliometric analysis of current web survey research in China , 2008 .

[16]  I. Ajzen.  Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. , 2002 .

[17]  A. Bandura.  Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  Hsiu-Mei Huang,et al.  Do print and Web surveys provide the same results? , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  D. Feltz,et al.  Current directions in self-efficacy research in sport , 2011 .

[20]  Meng Hsiang Hsu,et al.  An investigation of effort-accuracy trade-off and the impact of self-efficacy on Web searching behaviors , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[21]  Diane F. Witmer,et al.  From paper-and-pencil to screen-and-keyboard , 1970 .

[22]  Bin Wang,et al.  What makes them happy and curious online? An empirical study on high school students' Internet use from a self-determination theory perspective , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Eric D. Heggestad,et al.  The predictive validity of self-efficacy in training performance: little more than past performance. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[24]  Juan Herrero,et al.  Short Web-based versions of the perceived stress (PSS) and Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CESD) Scales: a comparison to pencil and paper responses among Internet users , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[25]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.

[26]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[27]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[28]  Jyh-Chong Liang,et al.  Internet Self-Efficacy and Preferences Toward Constructivist Internet-based Learning Environments: A Study of Pre-school Teachers in Taiwan , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[29]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Internet Self-Efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[30]  P. Philippot,et al.  Cross-cultural validity of the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire : adaptation and validation in a French-speaking sample , 2011 .

[31]  J. Turner.  Memorable encounters: Ideology, information acquisition, and television news , 2012 .

[32]  T. Meyer,et al.  Searching information on the Web and Planning Fallacy: A pilot investigation of pessimistic forecasts , 2012 .

[33]  Shu-Sheng Liaw,et al.  Exploring users' attitudes and intentions toward the web as a survey tool , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  Robert M. Klassen,et al.  Optimism and realism: A review of self‐efficacy from a cross‐cultural perspective , 2004 .

[35]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. , 2005 .

[36]  Z. Jian-xin.  Psychometric Equivalence Between Mobile Phone Based and Paper-and-pencil Tests: A Case with Children’s Revised Impact of Event Scale , 2010 .

[37]  Aline Chevalier,et al.  Query strategies during information searching: Effects of prior domain knowledge and complexity of the information problems to be solved , 2015, Inf. Process. Manag..

[38]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Taiwanese adolescents' perceptions and attitudes regarding the internet: exploring gender differences. , 2004, Adolescence.

[39]  Bassam Hasan,et al.  The influence of specific computer experiences on computer self-efficacy beliefs , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  A. Bandura.  GUIDE FOR CONSTRUCTING SELF-EFFICACY SCALES , 2006 .

[41]  Filip M. Wiecko.  Research Note: Assessing the validity of college samples: Are students really that different? , 2010 .

[42]  Mei Tian,et al.  Internet Self-Efficacy, the Need for Cognition, and Sensation Seeking as Predictors of Problematic Use of the Internet , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[43]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: the role of internet self-efficacy , 2003 .

[44]  Ying-Tien Wu,et al.  University Students' Internet Attitudes and Internet Self-Efficacy: AStudy at Three Universities in Taiwan , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[45]  Michael W. Browne,et al.  Topics in Applied Multivariate Analysis: COVARIANCE STRUCTURES , 1982 .

[46]  William L. Nicholls,et al.  The Effect of New Data Collection Technologies on Survey Data Quality , 1997 .

[47]  Zahide Yildirim,et al.  Students’ Web Search Strategies With Different Task Types: An Eye-Tracking Study , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[48]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[49]  J. E. Maddux,et al.  Self-Efficacy Theory , 1995 .

[50]  J. Richman,et al.  Developing Instruments for Cross‐Cultural Psychiatric Research , 1988, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[51]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[52]  J. Nunnally.  Introduction to Psychological Measurement , 1970 .

[53]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Junior high school students' Internet usage and self-efficacy: A re-examination of the gender gap , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[54]  Ryen W. White,et al.  WWW 2007 / Track: Browsers and User Interfaces Session: Personalization Investigating Behavioral Variability in Web Search , 2022 .

[55]  Jurek Kirakowski,et al.  Measuring Attitudes Towards the Internet: The General Internet Attitude Scale , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[56]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[57]  Peter Eachus,et al.  Development of the Web Users Self-Efficacy Scale (WUSE) , 2006 .

[58]  Karen R. Diaz,et al.  Online Searching Skills: Development of an Inventory to Assess Self-Efficacy , 2005 .

[59]  Jyh-Chong Liang,et al.  Self-efficacy in Internet-based Learning Environments: A Literature Review , 2011, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[60]  Diana Adler,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 2016 .

[61]  Cai Hua-Jian,et al.  Examining the Measurement Invariance between Paper-and-Pencil and Internet-Administered Tests in China , 2008 .

[62]  B. Muthén,et al.  Applying Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Models for Continuous Outcomes to Likert Scale Data Complicates Meaningful Group Comparisons , 2004 .

[63]  R. J-C. Chu,et al.  Self-directed learning readiness, Internet self-efficacy and preferences towards constructivist Internet-based learning environments among higher-aged adults , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[64]  P. Krishnaiah,et al.  On Covariance Structures. , 1975 .

[65]  A. Bandura.  Growing primacy of human agency in adaptation and change in the electronic era , 2002 .

[66]  Yaobin Lu,et al.  Internet inequality: The relationship between high school students' Internet use in different locations and their Internet self-efficacy , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[67]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Teachers' attitudes toward web-based professional development, with relation to Internet self-efficacy and beliefs about web-based learning , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[68]  K. Schermelleh-Engel,et al.  Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. , 2003 .

[69]  Cindy D. Kam,et al.  Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science: Students as Experimental Participants , 2011 .

[70]  M. Couper.  A REVIEW OF ISSUES AND APPROACHES , 2000 .

[71]  Ralf Schwarzer,et al.  Optimism, Vulnerability, and self-beliefs as health-related cognitions: A systematic overview , 1994 .

[72]  David M. McCord,et al.  Evaluating the College Sophomore Problem: The Case of Personality and Politics , 2010, The Journal of psychology.

[73]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site , 2002 .

[74]  Kan Jin,et al.  Seniors and Information Technology in China , 2016, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[75]  Fritz Drasgow,et al.  Personality assessment: Does the medium matter? No☆ , 2006 .

[76]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[77]  Cai Hua.  Examining the Measurement Invariance between Paper-and-Pencil and Internet-Administered Tests in China , 2008 .

[78]  John L. Smith,et al.  Using the Internet for psychological research: personality testing on the World Wide Web. , 1999, British journal of psychology.

[79]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Factor-analyzing Likert-scale data under the assumption of multivariate normality complicates a meaningful comparison of observed groups or latent classes , 2002 .

[80]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[81]  Thomas P. Van Dyke,et al.  Development and validation of an Internet self-efficacy scale , 2001, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[82]  Ralf Schwarzer,et al.  Self-Efficacy : Thought Control Of Action , 1992 .