Combined magnetic fields provide robust coverage for interbody and posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion sites

Electromagnetic fields generated by spinal bone growth stimulation devices have been computationally modelled to determine coverage of the lumbar spinal vertebrae. The underlying assumption of these models was that the electric field, but not the magnetic field, was therapeutically relevant. However, there are no published studies examining the therapeutic coverage of spinal fusion sites by stimulators utilizing combined magnetic fields. To assess the coverage, an anatomical model of the vertebrae and discs of the lumbar spine was developed to represent interbody and posterolateral fusion sites. Computer simulations of the induced electromagnetic fields were analysed to determine coverage of the fusion sites. For both interbody and posterolateral fusion models, combined magnetic fields provided 100 % coverage of the fusion sites for all intervertebral disc spaces and for all posterior planes from L1 to L5, respectively. Within the vertebral column, the magnitude of the electric field reached a maximum value of 3.6 × 10−4 V/m, which is several orders of magnitude less than any reported study demonstrating a biological effect. Given its clinical efficacy, a bone growth stimulator utilizing combined magnetic fields must rely on the action of its magnetic field rather than its electric field for a therapeutic effect.

[1]  C Gabriel,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Bruno Bisceglia,et al.  Numeric simulation of a therapeutic processing: Electrostimulation of bone rebuilding , 2008 .

[3]  B. Scammell,et al.  Electromagnetic Fields for Bone Healing , 2002, The international journal of lower extremity wounds.

[4]  J. Gibson,et al.  Foraminal Stenosis and Single-Level Degenerative Disc Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Decompression With Decompression and Instrumented Fusion , 2007, Spine.

[5]  R. Adair,et al.  Biophysical limits on athermal effects of RF and microwave radiation , 2003, Bioelectromagnetics.

[6]  Luis Aparecido Defino LUMBAR LORDOSIS : A STUDY OF ANGLE VALUES AND OF VERTEBRAL BODIES AND INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS ROLE , 2006 .

[7]  M. Blank Do electromagnetic fields interact with electrons in the Na,K‐ATPase? , 2005, Bioelectromagnetics.

[8]  Masamichi Kato,et al.  What Magnetic Field Parameters are Biologically Effective , 2006 .

[9]  W. Kane,et al.  Direct Current Electrical Bone Growth Stimulation for Spinal Fusion , 1988, Spine.

[10]  S. Grimaldi,et al.  Nonpulsed sinusoidal electromagnetic fields as a noninvasive strategy in bone repair: the effect on human mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation. , 2015, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[11]  D. Ciafaloni Cyclotronic Ion Resonance Therapy and Arthralgia , 2007, Electromagnetic biology and medicine.

[12]  A. Mcgregor,et al.  Geometrical dimensions of the lower lumbar vertebrae – analysis of data from digitised CT images , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[13]  E. Giudice,et al.  On the “unreasonable” effects of ELF magnetic fields upon a system of ions , 2002, Bioelectromagnetics.

[14]  Jitendra Behari,et al.  Effect of extremely low frequency magnetic field in prevention of spinal cord injury-induced osteoporosis. , 2013, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  V. Mooney,et al.  A Randomized Double-Blind Prospective Study of the Efficacy of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields for Interbody Lumbar Fusions , 1990, Spine.

[16]  M. Kurosaka,et al.  Differential gene expression and immunolocalization of insulin‐like growth factors and insulin‐like growth factor binding proteins between experimental nonunions and standard healing fractures , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[17]  F. P. Magee,et al.  The role of insulin-like growth factor II in magnetic field regulation of bone formation , 1994 .

[18]  A G Patwardhan,et al.  Analysis of the Morphometric Characteristics of the Thoracic and Lumbar Pedicles , 1987, Spine.

[19]  R. Rossi,et al.  Effects of Cyclotronic Ion Resonance on Human Metabolic Processes: A Clinical Trial and One Case Report , 2007, Electromagnetic biology and medicine.

[20]  F. Crescentini The Autistic Syndrome and Endogenous Ion Cyclotron Resonance: State of the Art , 2007, Electromagnetic biology and medicine.

[21]  M. Shoham,et al.  Morphometric Study of the Human Lumbar Spine for Operation–Workspace Specifications , 2001, Spine.

[22]  S. Sukkar,et al.  Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields Prevent Chemotherapy Induced Myelotoxicity , 2007, Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine.

[23]  Wu Yajun,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Circumferential Fusion Versus Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion in the Lumbar Spine , 2009, Spine.

[24]  C. Bono,et al.  7:46 Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the last 20 years , 2002 .

[25]  F. P. Magee,et al.  Combined magnetic fields accelerate and increase spine fusion: a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study. , 2002, Spine.

[26]  S. Stern,et al.  Key Techniques in Orthopaedic Surgery , 2001 .

[27]  F. P. Magee,et al.  IGF‐II receptor number is increased in TE‐85 osteosarcoma cells by combined magnetic fields , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[28]  F. P. Magee,et al.  Combined magnetic fields increased net calcium flux in bone cells , 1994, Calcified Tissue International.

[29]  J. Sandweiss,et al.  On the cyclotron resonance model of ion transport. , 1990, Bioelectromagnetics.

[30]  R. Harrington Time-Harmonic Electromagnetic Fields , 1961 .

[31]  K. Jokela,et al.  ICNIRP Guidelines GUIDELINES FOR LIMITING EXPOSURE TO TIME-VARYING , 1998 .

[32]  D. Cheng Field and wave electromagnetics , 1983 .

[33]  V. Ptáčník,et al.  Prediction of kidney depth and body thickness in renal scintigraphy , 2009 .

[34]  Frederick J. Milford,et al.  Foundations of Electromagnetic Theory , 1961 .

[35]  Choon-Sung Lee,et al.  Fusion Rates of Instrumented Lumbar Spinal Arthrodesis according to Surgical Approach: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials , 2011, Clinics in orthopedic surgery.

[36]  John R. Johnson,et al.  A double-blind study of capacitively coupled electrical stimulation as an adjunct to lumbar spinal fusions. , 1999, Spine.

[37]  A. Devadoss,et al.  Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Intertransverse Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic surgery.

[38]  Arthur A. Pilla,et al.  Mechanisms and Therapeutic Applications of Time-Varying and Static Magnetic Fields , 2018, Biological and Medical Aspects of Electromagnetic Fields.

[39]  Raj D. Rao,et al.  Autograft containment in posterolateral spine fusion. , 2008, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[40]  J. Fields,et al.  Electromagnetic cellular interactions. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[41]  A. Pilla,et al.  A Lorentz model for weak magnetic field bioeffects: Part II—Secondary transduction mechanisms and measures of reactivity , 2009, Bioelectromagnetics.

[42]  Richard H W Funk,et al.  Electromagnetic effects - From cell biology to medicine. , 2009, Progress in histochemistry and cytochemistry.

[43]  G. Fede,et al.  Utilization of Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Magnetic Fields in Chronic Disease; Five Years Experience: Three Case Reports , 2007, Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine.

[44]  Joachim Gartzke,et al.  Cellular target of weak magnetic fields: ionic conduction along actin filaments of microvilli. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[45]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[46]  F. P. Magee,et al.  Combined magnetic fields increase insulin-like growth factor-II in TE-85 human osteosarcoma bone cell cultures. , 1995, Endocrinology.

[47]  Maciej Zborowski,et al.  Magnetic Field Visualization in Applications to Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulation of Tissues , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[48]  Luiz Henrique Fonseca Damasceno,et al.  Lordose lombar: estudo dos valores angulares e da participação dos corpos vertebrais e discos intervertebrais , 2006 .

[49]  S. Pollack,et al.  Theoretical determination of the current density distributions in human vertebral bodies during electrical stimulation , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[50]  C. Bono,et al.  Critical Analysis of Trends in Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease Over the Past 20 Years: Influence of Technique on Fusion Rate and Clinical Outcome , 2004, Spine.

[51]  K. Lange,et al.  F‐actin‐based Ca signaling—a critical comparison with the current concept of Ca signaling , 2006, Journal of cellular physiology.

[52]  A. Pilla,et al.  A Lorentz model for weak magnetic field bioeffects: Part I—Thermal noise is an essential component of AC/DC effects on bound ion trajectory , 2009, Bioelectromagnetics.

[53]  S. Mohan,et al.  The multi-functional role of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in bone , 2005, Pediatric Nephrology.

[54]  R. Delamarter,et al.  Spinal Fusion in the United States: Analysis of Trends From 1998 to 2008 , 2012, Spine.