The impact of regulatory obligations on fishers’ income: Identifying perceptions using a market-testing tool

Abstract Profit is an important driver of fishers’ behaviour. Thus, identifying fishers’ regulatory preferences in economic terms can assist the creation of more acceptable, workable and sustainable policies. The Adaptive Conjoint Analysis (ACA) method was adapted from its original application as a marketing tool to identify fishers’ most and least preferred regulatory obligations in terms of the impact these obligations have on their income. Significant differences were identified in fishers’ preferences that depended on the regulatory measures fishers operated under at the time of the study (which related to the fishery and the region in which the fishers belonged). All fishers agreed that access to resources, i.e. how much access they have within a certain sea area was most important for their income. However, there were differences in fishers’ preferences with regards to the majority of regulatory measures; inshore fishers preferred restrictions related to the category ‘Days at Sea’ rather than ‘Total Allowable Catches’, and vice versa for offshore fishers. Fishers’ preferences varied most for ‘Enforcement and Compliance’ related obligations with the general trend being that fishers tend to prefer the measure with which they are most accustomed. This paper emphasises the need for additional knowledge at a more localised level on fishers’ regulatory perceptions. Such knowledge will allow regulators to account for fishers’ perceptions and attitudes towards regulatory measures when formulating legislation. Accounting for perceptions and attitudes of the relevant stakeholders will assist the successful implementation of new measures by providing relevant incentives and mitigation measures.

[1]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Simulation Study of a Series Hydraulic Hybrid Propulsion System for a Light Truck , 2007 .

[2]  J. Castilla,et al.  Engagement in co-management of marine benthic resources influences environmental perceptions of artisanal fishers , 2008, Environmental Conservation.

[3]  K. Kuperan,et al.  A socio‐economic theory of regulatory compliance , 1999 .

[4]  P. Schembri,et al.  Fishers' perception of a 35-year old exclusive Fisheries Management Zone. , 2009 .

[5]  Ray Hilborn,et al.  Institutions, incentives and the future of fisheries , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  E. Paul,et al.  Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 2. Understanding dairy farmers' motivations. , 2010, Research in veterinary science.

[7]  J. Castilla,et al.  Artisanal fishers' perceptions regarding coastal co-management policies in Chile and their potentials to scale-up marine biodiversity conservation , 2009 .

[8]  T. Gray,et al.  Fisheries science and sustainability in international policy: a study of failure in the European Union's Common Fisheries Policy , 2005 .

[9]  M. Salomon,et al.  Flexible management of fishing rights and a sustainable fisheries industry in Europe , 2006 .

[10]  M. Austen,et al.  Perceptions of stakeholders towards objectives and zoning of marine-protected areas in southern Europe , 2008 .

[11]  R. Huirne,et al.  Improving Food Safety at the Dairy Farm Level: Farmers' and Experts' Perceptions , 2005 .

[12]  Sakari Kuikka,et al.  Risk identification and perception in the fisheries sector: Comparisons between the Faroes, Greece, Iceland and UK , 2010 .

[13]  T. Gray,et al.  Liberal intergovernmentalism, historical institutionalism, and British and German perceptions of the EU's Common Fisheries Policy , 2009 .

[14]  Elizabeth T. Kinter,et al.  Things are Looking up Since We Started Listening to Patients , 2008, The patient.

[15]  Anthony D. M. Smith,et al.  Implementing effective fisheries-management systems – management strategy evaluation and the Australian partnership approach , 1999 .

[16]  Robert Arlinghaus,et al.  Using a novel survey technique to predict fisheries stakeholders' support for European eel (Anguilla anguilla L.) conservation programs. , 2009 .

[17]  Sean Pascoe,et al.  Evaluation of the importance of fisheries management objectives using choice-experiments , 2005 .

[18]  R. Huirne,et al.  Adaptive conjoint analysis to determine perceived risk factors of farmers, veterinarians and AI technicians for introduction of BHV1 to dairy farms. , 1998, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[19]  R. Watson,et al.  Global fishery development patterns are driven by profit but not trophic level , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  T. Waterhouse,et al.  Future of the hills of Scotland: Stakeholders' preferences for policy priorities , 2010 .

[21]  M. Smale,et al.  Economic concepts for designing policies to conserve crop genetic resources on farms , 2004, Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution.

[22]  B. Orme Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research , 2005 .

[23]  A. Charles Fishery Socioeconomics: A Survey , 1988 .

[24]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[25]  R. Lidskog In Science We Trust? On the Relation Between Scientific Knowledge, Risk Consciousness and Public Trust , 1996 .

[26]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice , 1990 .

[27]  M. Pyrovetsi,et al.  Comparison of conservation attitudes among fishermen in three protected lakes in Greece , 1990 .

[28]  H. Eggert,et al.  Small-scale Fishermen and Risk Preferences , 2007, Marine Resource Economics.

[29]  K. Soma,et al.  How to involve stakeholders in fisheries management : a country case study in Trinidad and Tobago , 2003 .

[30]  A Karagiannakos,et al.  Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and quota management system in the European Union , 1996 .

[31]  P. Cross,et al.  Differences in the perceptions of farmers and veterinary surgeons about the efficacy of mitigation strategies for controlling bluetongue , 2009, Veterinary Record.

[32]  Anthony J. Culyer,et al.  Adaptive Conjoint Analysis , 2014 .

[33]  Garry R. Russ,et al.  Marine reserve benefits local fisheries , 2004 .

[34]  G. Edwards‐Jones,et al.  Distribution of the burden of fisheries regulations in Europe: The north/south divide , 2010 .

[35]  D. Holland Are Fishermen Rational? A Fishing Expedition , 2008, Marine Resource Economics.

[36]  John F P Bridges,et al.  Things are Looking up Since We Started Listening to Patients: Trends in the Application of Conjoint Analysis in Health 1982-2007. , 2008, The patient.

[37]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure , 1993 .