Acoustic "breathiness measures" in the description of pathologic voices

One important perceptual attribute of voice quality is breathiness. Since breathiness is generally regarded to be caused by glottal air leakage, acoustic measures related to breathiness may be used to distinguish between different physiological phonation conditions for pathological voices. Seven "breathiness features" described in the literature plus one self-developed measure (the glottal to noise excitation ratio, GNE) are compared for their distinguishing properties between different well-defined pathological phonation mechanisms. It is found that only GNE allows a distinction between all the pathological groups and both the normal and aphonic reference group. Furthermore, GNE is among the measures showing the most significant distinctions between the different pathologic phonation mechanism groups. Therefore GNE should be given preference over the other features in the independent assessment of glottal air leakage or "breathiness" for moderately or highly disturbed voices.

[1]  J. Perkell,et al.  Comparisons among aerodynamic, electroglottographic, and acoustic spectral measures of female voice. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  D G Childers,et al.  Vocal quality factors: analysis, synthesis, and perception. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  G. de Krom,et al.  Some spectral correlates of pathological breathy and rough voice quality for different types of vowel fragments. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  P. Zwirner Korrelationen zwischen perzeptueller Beurteilung von Stimmen nach dem RBH-System und akustischen Parametern , 1998 .

[5]  Guus de Krom,et al.  A Cepstrum-Based Technique for Determining a Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio in Speech Signals , 1993 .

[6]  J. Sundberg,et al.  Perceptual and acoustic correlates of abnormal voice qualities. , 1980, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[7]  J. Kreiman,et al.  The multidimensional nature of pathologic vocal quality. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  P. Milenkovic,et al.  Least mean square measures of voice perturbation. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  Dirk Michaelis,et al.  Empirical study to test the independence of different acoustic voice parameters on a large voice database , 1995, EUROSPEECH.

[10]  D Michaelis,et al.  Selection and combination of acoustic features for the description of pathologic voices. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  H. Kasuya,et al.  Normalized noise energy as an acoustic measure to evaluate pathologic voice. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  I. Titze,et al.  Comparison of Fo extraction methods for high-precision voice perturbation measurements. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  D. Childers,et al.  Acoustic correlates of vocal quality. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[15]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality: dysphonic voices and continuous speech. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  Hans Werner Strube,et al.  Acoustic voice quality description: Case studies for different regions of the hoarseness diagram , 1998 .

[17]  Hans Werner Strube,et al.  Glottal-to-Noise Excitation Ratio - a New Measure for Describing Pathological Voices , 1997 .