Egocentric contact networks in comparison: Taiwan and Hungary

Abstract This study compares the size and structure of egocentric networks in Taiwan and Hungary using a diary approach. Both countries have transformed from authoritarian regimes to democratic states, yet they differ in social, economic, and cultural institutions that may be common to the respective larger region where each is located. To sample the structure of each egocentric network, we extracted information from largely identical contact diaries collected in both countries, 51 from Taiwan and 138 from Hungary. After comparing sample characteristics, network size, and composition, we construct a Strength of Ties (SoT) index based on two objective and two subjective measures of ego-alter ties. We then use this index to analyze tie strength by the types of relationships. On average, the number of alters contacted in one week is much larger in Taiwan than in Hungary, and the gap remains unchanged after controlling for key socio-demographic background factors. Even though the four indicators that we use to construct the SoT index are distributed similarly among the respondents in both Taiwan and Hungary, the composite index pinpoints how the types of relationships play somewhat different roles across the nations. The findings imply that the tendency to maintain only the closest ties with kin and other close friends is linked to distrust in others, a possible ill effect lingering from the authoritarian past. The implication is partially supported by further analyses using the ISSP 2006 survey data. We address how our findings may contribute to the existing literature on the linkage between societal characteristics and interpersonal ties.

[1]  Ken'ichi Ikeda,et al.  East Asian Social Networks , 2018, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[2]  Nan Lin,et al.  The Position Generator: Measurement Techniques for Investigations of Social Capital , 2017 .

[3]  Peter V. Marsden,et al.  Interviewer effects in measuring network size using a single name generator , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[4]  C. Kadushin.  Understanding Social Networks: Theories, Concepts, and Findings , 2011 .

[5]  M. Kochen,et al.  Contacts and influence , 1978 .

[6]  Michael W. Morris,et al.  Guanxi vs networking: Distinctive configurations of affect- and cognition-based trust in the networks of Chinese vs American managers , 2009 .

[7]  G. Bakacsi,et al.  Eastern european cluster: tradition and transition , 2002 .

[8]  M.P.J. van der Gaag.  Proposals for the measurement of individual social capital , 2003 .

[9]  Linton C. Freeman,et al.  An international comparative study of interpersonal behavior and role relationships , 1997 .

[10]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  K. Campbell,et al.  Name generators in surveys of personal networks , 1991 .

[12]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  The Resource Generator: social capital quantification with concrete items , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[13]  Markku Lonkila,et al.  Social Networks in Post-Soviet Russia. Continuity and Change in the Everyday Life of St. Petersburg Teachers , 1999 .

[14]  T. Snijders,et al.  Proposals for the measurement of individual social capital , 2003 .

[15]  Yang-chih Fu,et al.  Contact Diaries , 2007 .

[16]  Yang-chih Fu,et al.  Measuring personal networks with daily contacts: a single-item survey question and the contact diary , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[17]  Nan Lin,et al.  Access to occupations through social ties , 1986 .

[18]  C. McCarty,et al.  COMPARING FOUR DIFFERENT METHODS FOR MEASURING PERSONAL SOCIAL NETWORKS , 1990 .

[19]  M. Haller,et al.  Kinship and social networks in modern societies: a cross-cultural comparison among seven nations , 1990 .

[20]  János Kornai,et al.  By Force of Thought: Irregular Memoirs of an Intellectual Journey , 2006 .

[21]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers , 1974 .

[22]  Julie M. Hite.  Evolutionary Processes and Paths of Relationally Embedded Network Ties in Emerging Entrepreneurial Firms , 2005 .

[23]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[24]  B. Erickson.  Culture, Class, and Connections , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  Beate Völker,et al.  WEAK TIES AS A LIABILITY , 2001 .

[26]  Mayfair M Yang.  Gifts, Favors, and Banquets: The Art of Social Relationships in China , 1996, Journal of Asian Studies.

[27]  M. Gurevitch,et al.  The social structure of acquaintanceship networks , 1961 .

[28]  Yang-chih Fu,et al.  Weak ties and contact initiation in everyday life: Exploring contextual variations from contact diaries , 2013, Soc. Networks.

[29]  Peter V. Marsden,et al.  Reflections on Conceptualizing and Measuring Tie Strength , 2012 .

[30]  N. Hens,et al.  Mining social mixing patterns for infectious disease models based on a two-day population survey in Belgium , 2009, BMC infectious diseases.

[31]  Masao Nobe,et al.  The Community Question , 1991 .

[32]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  The Reverse Small World Experiment II. , 1979 .

[33]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  Investigating the Variation of Personal Network Size Under Unknown Error Conditions , 2006 .

[34]  C. Fischer.  What Do We Mean by 'Friend'? An Inductive Study* , 1982 .

[35]  C. Fischer,et al.  To Dwell among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. , 1984 .

[36]  Michael C. White,et al.  Association of Indicators and Predictors of TIE Strength , 1998 .

[37]  B. Wellman.  The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[38]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[39]  Linton C. Freeman,et al.  On the changing structure of social networks in urban China , 1997 .

[40]  T. Arentze,et al.  Eliciting social network data , 2008 .

[41]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  Devon D. Brewer,et al.  Forgetting in the recall-based elicitation of personal and social networks , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[43]  Tamás Nepusz,et al.  Measuring tie-strength in virtual social networks , 2006 .

[44]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  Contact Profiles in Eight European Countries and Implications for Modelling the Spread of Airborne Infectious Diseases , 2009, PloS one.

[45]  Éva Huszti,et al.  Strong Tie, Weak Tie and In-betweens: a Continuous Measure of Tie Strength Based on Contact Diary Datasets , 2013 .

[46]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  How Many People Do You Know?: Efficiently Estimating Personal Network Size , 2010, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[47]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  Social Contacts and Mixing Patterns Relevant to the Spread of Infectious Diseases , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[48]  McColmFreedom House,et al.  Freedom in the World , 1993 .

[49]  Nan Lin,et al.  Social Capital and Its Institutional Contingency : A Study of the United States, China and Taiwan , 2013 .

[50]  Soon Ang,et al.  Guanxi Networks and Job Mobility in China and Singapore , 1997 .

[51]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Statistical Models for Social Support Networks , 1993 .

[52]  Julie M. Hite.  Patterns of Multidimensionality among Embedded Network Ties: A Typology of Relational Embeddedness in Emerging Entrepreneurial Firms , 2003 .

[53]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[54]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Network items and the general social survey , 1984 .

[55]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[56]  Arthur P. Wolf,et al.  Marriage and Adoption in China, 1845-1945 , 1980 .

[57]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[58]  Julie M. Hite.  The Role of Dyadic Multi-Dimensionality in the Evolution of Strategic Network Ties , 2008 .

[59]  B. Erickson,et al.  The distribution of gendered social capital in Canada , 2004 .

[60]  Maria Spirova.  Political Parties in Post-Communist Societies: Formation, Persistence, and Change , 2008 .

[61]  S Riley,et al.  Close encounters of the infectious kind: methods to measure social mixing behaviour , 2012, Epidemiology and Infection.

[62]  Tian Zheng,et al.  How Many People Do You Know in Prison? , 2006 .