GENDER AND PUBLISHING IN SOCIOLOGY

As in other fields, scholarly publication in sociology is not only the key to career success but also the route by which feminist analyses and perspectives become known to others in the discipline. A growing literature has analyzed women's and men's rates of publication, but the gender politics of the prepublication production of research and gender differences in reputation building after publication remain underexplored. This report reviews the current state of knowledge about sociological publishing at three phases: prepublication, the publication-seeking phase, and postpublication. It concludes with critical questions to be addressed in developing a comprehensive model of gender effects on sociological publishing.

[1]  B. Reskin,et al.  Scientific Productivity, Sex, and Location in the Institution of Science , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  R. Over,et al.  Representation of women on the editorial boards of psychology journals. , 1981 .

[3]  M. Ferber,et al.  Are Women Economists at a Disadvantage in Publishing Journal Articles , 1980 .

[4]  A. Simeone.  Academic Women: Working Towards Equality , 1986 .

[5]  M. F. Fox.  Publication Productivity among Scientists: A Critical Review , 1983 .

[6]  Judith Stacey,et al.  THE MISSING FEMINIST REVOLUTION IN SOCIOLOGY , 1985 .

[7]  Lynn Weber Cannon,et al.  The Costs of Exclusionary Practices in Women's Studies , 1986, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[8]  R. Brewer.  Black women and feminist sociology: The emerging perspective , 1989 .

[9]  J. Sprague,et al.  Quality and quantity: Reconstructing feminist methodology , 1989 .

[10]  K. Crittenden,et al.  Why a Rejection? Causal Attribution of a Career Achievement Event , 1979 .

[11]  Patricia Hill Collins,et al.  Black Feminist Thought , 2020, Theories of Race and Racism.

[12]  C. Korsmeyer,et al.  Feminist Scholarship: Kindling in the Groves of Academe , 1986 .

[13]  Judith A. Cook,et al.  Knowledge and Women's Interests: Issues of Epistemology and Methodology in Feminist Sociological Research* , 1986 .

[14]  L. Grant,et al.  THE FEMINIST CRITIQUE AND A DECADE OF PUBLISHED RESEARCH IN SOCIOLOGY JOURNALS , 1985 .

[15]  Women of Academe: Outsiders in the Sacred Grove , 1989 .

[16]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  The compleat academic : a practical guide for the beginning social scientist , 1987 .

[17]  R. Menges,et al.  Barriers to the Progress of Women and Minority Faculty , 1983 .

[18]  C. Farnham.  The Impact of Feminist Research in the Academy. , 1989 .

[19]  Stanley Presser,et al.  Collaboration and the Quality of Research , 1980 .

[20]  M. Ferber,et al.  Citations: Are They an Objective Measure of Scholarly Merit? , 1986, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[21]  A. White.  Women as authors and editors of psychological journals: A 10-year perspective. , 1985 .

[22]  Robert L. Helmreich,et al.  Making it in academic psychology: Demographic and personality correlates of attainment. , 1980 .

[23]  R. Over.  Research productivity and impact of male and female psychologists. , 1982, The American psychologist.

[24]  H. Zuckerman,et al.  The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community , 1991 .

[25]  M. Ferber,et al.  CITATIONS AND NETWORKING , 1988 .

[26]  Y. Shenhav.  Dependency and Compliance in Academic Research Infrastructures , 1986 .

[27]  J. Stacey.  Can there be a feminist ethnography , 1988 .

[28]  R. Boice,et al.  Women and publishing in psychology. , 1985 .

[29]  L. Grant,et al.  Productivity of women scholars and gender researchers: Is funding a factor? , 1989 .

[30]  R. Kanter,et al.  Another Voice Feminist Perspectives on Social Life and Social Science , 1977 .

[31]  S. Delamont.  Three Blind Spots? A Comment on the Sociology of Science by a Puzzled Outsider , 1987 .

[32]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Quantitative Measures of Communication in Science: A Study of the Formal Level , 1986 .

[33]  S. Kulis.  The representation of women in top ranked sociology departments , 1988 .

[34]  J. Freeman,et al.  Women: A Feminist Perspective. , 1976 .

[35]  E. Keller.  Reflections on Gender and Science , 1985 .

[36]  Lowell L. Hargens.  Relations Between Work Habits, Research Technologies, and Eminence in Science , 1978 .

[37]  R. Unger.  Through the Looking Glass: No Wonderland Yet! (The Reciprocal Relationship between Methodology and Models of Reality) , 1983 .

[38]  Liz Stanley,et al.  Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research , 1984 .

[39]  H. Zuckerman,et al.  Marriage, motherhood and research performance in science. , 1987, Scientific American.

[40]  H. Roberts,et al.  Doing Feminist Research. , 1982 .

[41]  Lynn Weber Cannon,et al.  RACE AND CLASS BIAS IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ON WOMEN , 1988 .

[42]  Clark McPhail,et al.  The Manuscript Review and Decision-Making Process , 1987 .

[43]  J. S. Long,et al.  The Origins of Sex Differences in Science , 1990 .

[44]  S. Harding.  The science question in feminism , 1986 .

[45]  K. Miller,et al.  Are minority women sociologists in double jeopardy? , 1988 .

[46]  M. Zald,et al.  American Conservatism and Government Funding of the Social Sciences and the Arts , 1984 .

[47]  C. Dudley,et al.  Sex Differences in Sociology Specializations, 1975–1985: Women's Liberation to Ghetto Specialization , 1987 .

[48]  Mary Frank Fox,et al.  Scholarly Writing And Publishing: Issues, Problems, And Solutions , 1985 .

[49]  Jonathan R. Cole,et al.  Fair Science: Women in the Scientific Community , 1987 .

[50]  D. Smith,et al.  The everyday world as problematic , 1987 .

[51]  L. Grant,et al.  Is There An Association between Gender and Methods in Sociological Research , 1987 .