Whether close or far: Social distance effects on perceived balance in friendship networks

Under what circumstances are individuals' perceptions of friendship relations shaped by the balance schema? Using data from 4 organizations varying in size from 21 to 33 members, the authors investigated how ego's perception of the social distance from ego to alter affected the proportion of alter's friendships perceived by ego as balanced. Balance involves both (a) reciprocated friendships between 2 people, and (b) transitive triplets, in which 2 friends of a person are themselves friends. Graphical and regression analyses supported a composite curvilinear model that combined the predictions of emotional tension and cognitive miser perspectives: People tended to perceive relations close to and distant from themselves as more balanced than relations of intermediate distance.

[1]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[2]  F. J. Roethlisberger,et al.  Management and the Worker: An Account of a Research Program Conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago , 1939 .

[3]  W. Whyte.  HUMAN RELATIONS in the Restaurant Industry , 1949 .

[4]  W. Kephart,et al.  A Quantitative Analysis of Intragroup Relationships , 1950, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  Donald F. Roy.  Efficiency and "The Fix": Informal Intergroup Relations in a Piecework Machine Shop , 1954, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  L. Festinger,et al.  An experimental investigation of the effect of unstable interpersonal relations in a group. , 1954, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[7]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[8]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[9]  De Soto Cb,et al.  Learning a social structure. , 1960 .

[10]  T. Newcomb.  The acquaintance process , 1961 .

[11]  Kuethe Jl.  Social schemas and the reconstruction of social object displays from memory. , 1962 .

[12]  C. Insko,et al.  COGNITIVE CONSISTENCY AND PERFORMANCE IN THE AUTOKINETIC SITUATION. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[13]  Frank Harary,et al.  Graph Theory , 2016 .

[14]  A. Gouldner,et al.  For sociology: renewal and critique in sociology today , 1974 .

[15]  U. Neisser.  Cognition and reality: principles and implications , 1976 .

[16]  Samuel Leinhardt,et al.  Social Networks: A Developing Paradigm , 1977 .

[17]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena , 1978 .

[18]  C. Insko,et al.  Interpersonal attraction and the polarity of similar attitudes: A test of three balance models. , 1979 .

[19]  C. Richard Puff,et al.  Memory Organization and Structure , 1979 .

[20]  Samuel Leinhardt,et al.  Perspectives on social network research , 1980 .

[21]  C. Insko,et al.  Interpersonal attraction and person perception: Two tests of three balance models , 1981 .

[22]  D. Hamilton.  Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior , 1981 .

[23]  J. Harvey.  Cognition, social behavior, and the environment , 1981 .

[24]  W. H. Crockett,et al.  Balance, Agreement, and Positivity in the Cognition of Small Social Structures1 , 1982 .

[25]  R. Burt.  Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure , 1985 .

[26]  Daniel J. Brass.  Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. , 1984 .

[27]  Michael Argyle,et al.  The anatomy of relationships and the rules and skills needed to manage them successfully , 1985 .

[28]  G. Walker,et al.  Network Position and Cognition in a Computer Software Firm , 1985 .

[29]  L. Hedges,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[30]  David Krackhardt,et al.  The snowball effect: Turnover embedded in communication networks. , 1986 .

[31]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Cognitive social structures , 1987 .

[32]  D. Funder,et al.  Errors and mistakes: evaluating the accuracy of social judgment. , 1987, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  David Krackhardt,et al.  PREDICTING WITH NETWORKS: NONPARAMETRIC MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF DYADIC DATA * , 1988 .

[34]  Manfred Kochen,et al.  Small World , 2002 .

[35]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Friendship Patterns and Culture: The Control of Organizational Diversity , 1990 .

[36]  D. Krackhardt.  Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. , 1990 .

[37]  John Scott.  Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[38]  Kenneth D. Bailey,et al.  Macro-micro linkages in sociology , 1992 .

[39]  R. D'Andrade.  Human motives and cultural models: Schemas and motivation , 1992 .

[40]  J. M. McPherson,et al.  Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics , 1992 .

[41]  L. Freeman.  Filling in the Blanks: A Theory of Cognitive Categories and the Structure of Social Affiliation , 1992 .

[42]  A. Fiske.  The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations. , 1992, Psychological review.

[43]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[44]  Claudia Strauss,et al.  Human Motives and Cultural Models , 1992 .

[45]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Do people know how others view them? An empirical and theoretical account. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Bringing the Individual Back in: A Structural Analysis of the Internal Market for Reputation in Organizations , 1994 .

[47]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[48]  W. Batchelder,et al.  Systematic Biases in Social Perception , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[49]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[50]  R. Kapuściński,et al.  A brief history of balance through time , 1996 .

[51]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Do we know how much people like one another , 1996 .

[52]  C. Insko.  A Balance-Logic Perspective on Kruglanski and Thompson's Single-Route Approach to Persuasion , 1999 .