Progress towards internal transport barriers at high plasma density sustained by pure electron heating and current drive in the FTU tokamak

Strong electron internal transport barriers (ITBs) are obtained in FTU by the combined injection of lower hybrid (LH, up to 1.9 MW) and electron cyclotron (EC, up to 0.8 MW) radio frequency waves. ITBs occur during either the current plateau or the ramp-up phase, and both in full and partial current drive (CD) regimes, up to peak densities ne0>1.2×1020 m−3, relevant to ITER operation. Central electron temperatures Te0>11 keV, at ne0≈0.8×1020 m−3 are sustained longer than 35 confinement times. The ITB extends over a region where a slightly reversed magnetic shear is established by off-axis LHCD and can be as wide as r/a = 0.5. The EC power, instead, is used either to benefit from this improved confinement by heating inside the ITB, or to enhance the peripheral LH power deposition and CD with off-axis resonance. Collisional ion heating is also observed, but thermal equilibrium with the electrons cannot be attained since the e−–i+ equipartition time is always 4–5 times longer than the energy confinement time. The transport analysis performed with both ASTRA and JETTO codes shows a very good relation between the foot of the barrier and the weak/reversed shear region, which in turn depends on the LH deposition profile. The Bohm-gyroBohm model accounts for the electron transport until Te0<6 keV, but is pessimistic at higher temperatures, where often also a reduction in the ion thermal conductivity is observed, provided any magnetohydrodynamic activity is suppressed.

[1]  V. Parail,et al.  Effect of low magnetic shear induced by lower hybrid current drive on high performance internal transport barriers in the Joint , 2002 .

[2]  X. Litaudon,et al.  A dimensionless criterion for characterizing internal transport barriers in JET , 2002 .

[3]  F. Imbeaux,et al.  Progress in internal transport barrier plasmas with lower hybrid current drive and heating in JET (Joint European Torus) , 2002 .

[4]  C. Sozzi,et al.  Gradient length driven transport in EC heated FTU tokamak , 2002 .

[5]  G. Giruzzi,et al.  Synergy between LH and ECH waves in the FTU tokamak , 2002 .

[6]  F. Imbeaux,et al.  Experimental studies of electron transport , 2001 .

[7]  E. Barbato ECRH studies: internal transport barriers and MHD stabilization , 2001 .

[8]  Y. Peysson High power lower hybrid current drive experiments in the Tore Supra tokamak , 2001 .

[9]  F. Imbeaux,et al.  q-profile evolution and improved core electron confinement in the full current drive operation on Tore Supra , 2001 .

[10]  J. Kinsey,et al.  Progress towards increased understanding and control of internal transport barriers in DIII-D , 2002 .

[11]  O. Naito,et al.  LHCD current profile control experiments towards steady state improved confinement on JT-60U , 2000 .

[12]  A. Taroni,et al.  A GENERAL EMPIRICALLY BASED MICROINSTABILITY TRANSPORT MODEL , 1998 .

[13]  A. D. Piliya,et al.  Fast ray tracing code for LHCD simulations , 1996 .

[14]  S. Nowak,et al.  Three-dimensional propagation and absorption of high frequency Gaussian beams in magnetoactive plasmas , 1994 .

[15]  G. V. Pereverzev,et al.  Transport analysis of lower hybrid current drive plasmas in ASDEX , 1992 .

[16]  F. Romanelli,et al.  Broadening of the lower hybrid k∥ spectrum by toroidal effects , 1990 .

[17]  D. Pacella,et al.  Impurity transport simulation in Radiatively Improved and ITB plasmas in FTU , 2002 .

[18]  M. Murakami,et al.  Progress towards increased understanding and control of internal transport barriers in DIII-D , 2002 .

[19]  G. Giruzzi,et al.  Combined LH and ECH Experiments in the FTU Tokamak , 2000 .

[20]  G. Hammett,et al.  Gyrofluid simulations of turbulence suppression in reversed-shear experiments on the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor , 1997 .