A Blind Dereverberation Method for Narrowband Source Localization

Narrowband source localization gets extremely challenging in strong reverberation. When the room is perfectly known, some dictionary-based methods have recently been proposed, allowing source localization with few measurements. In this paper, we first show that, for these methods, the choice of frequencies is important as they fail to localize sources that emit at a frequency near the modal frequencies of the room. A more difficult case, but also important in practice, is when the room geometry and boundary conditions are unknown. In this setup, we introduce a new model for the acoustic soundfield, based on the Vekua theory, that allows a separation of the field into its reverberant and direct source contributions, at the cost of more measurements. This can be used for the design of a dereverberation pre-processing step, suitable for a large variety of standard source localization techniques. We discuss the spatial sampling strategies for the sound field, in order to successfully recover acoustic sources, and the influence of parameters such as number of measurements and model order. This is validated in numerical and experimental tests, that show that this method significantly improves localization in strong reverberant conditions.

[1]  Alessio Del Bue,et al.  A closed form solution to the microphone position self-calibration problem , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[2]  Alan B. Tayler,et al.  New methods for solving elliptic equations , 1969 .

[3]  Heinrich Kuttruff,et al.  Room acoustics , 1973 .

[4]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Room helps: Acoustic localization with finite elements , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[5]  Stanley C. Eisenstat On the Rate of Convergence of the Bergman–Vekua Method for the Numerical Solution of Elliptic Boundary Value Problems , 1974 .

[6]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Michael Elad,et al.  The Cosparse Analysis Model and Algorithms , 2011, ArXiv.

[8]  Ralf Hiptmair,et al.  Plane wave approximation of homogeneous Helmholtz solutions , 2011 .

[9]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[10]  Michael Zibulevsky,et al.  Signal reconstruction in sensor arrays using sparse representations , 2006, Signal Process..

[11]  Jonathan Le Roux,et al.  Source localization in reverberant environments using sparse optimization , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[12]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Greed is good: algorithmic results for sparse approximation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[13]  J. Charles,et al.  A Sino-German λ 6 cm polarization survey of the Galactic plane I . Survey strategy and results for the first survey region , 2006 .

[14]  Peter Henrici,et al.  A survey of I. N. Vekua's theory of elliptic partial differential equations with analytic coefficients , 1957 .

[15]  Laurent Daudet,et al.  Reconstruction of solutions to the Helmholtz equation from punctual measurements , 2013 .

[16]  M. Fink,et al.  Time reversal of ultrasonic fields. I. Basic principles , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[17]  Rémi Gribonval,et al.  Physics-driven structured cosparse modeling for source localization , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[18]  M. Fink,et al.  In solid localization of finger impacts using acoustic time-reversal process , 2005 .