Usability of the Stylus Pen in Mobile Electronic Documentation

Stylus pens are often used with mobile information devices. However, few studies have examined the stylus’ simple movements because the technical expertise to support documentation with stylus pens has not been developed. This study examined the usability of stylus pens in authentic documentation tasks, including three main tasks (sentence, table, and paragraph making) with two types of styluses (touchsmart stylus and mobile stylus) and a traditional pen. The statistical results showed that participants preferred the traditional pen in all criteria. Because of inconvenient hand movements, the mobile stylus was the least preferred on every task. Mobility does not provide any advantage in using the stylus. In addition, the study also found inconvenient hand support using a stylus and different feedback between a stylus and a traditional pen.

[1]  Eunil Park,et al.  Does panel type affect haptic experience? An empirical comparison of touch screen panels for smartphones , 2014, Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces.

[2]  Andreas Holzinger,et al.  Usability engineering methods for software developers , 2005, CACM.

[3]  A. Haslett Electronics , 1948 .

[4]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Understanding performance in touch selections: Tap, drag and radial pointing drag with finger, stylus and mouse , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  Xiangshi Ren,et al.  Improving selection performance on pen-based systems: a study of pen-based interaction for selection tasks , 2000, TCHI.

[6]  Stephen A. Brewster Sound in the interface to a mobile computer , 1999, HCI.

[7]  André Calero Valdez,et al.  Mobile Computing is not Always Advantageous: Lessons Learned from a Real-World Case Study in a Hospital , 2014, CD-ARES.

[8]  Adina Shamir,et al.  The educational electronic book as a tool for supporting children's emergent literacy in low versus middle SES groups , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Ju-Hwan Lee,et al.  Effects of Feedforward in In-Air Remote Pointing , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  Brad A. Myers,et al.  EdgeWrite: a stylus-based text entry method designed for high accuracy and stability of motion , 2003, UIST '03.

[11]  Andreas Holzinger,et al.  An Answer to "Who Needs a Stylus?" on Handwriting Recognition on Mobile Devices , 2011, ICETE.

[12]  Jun Rekimoto,et al.  Ambient touch: designing tactile interfaces for handheld devices , 2002, UIST '02.

[13]  H. Chu Electronic books: viewpoints from users and potential users , 2003 .

[14]  R. Mickelson WHY DOES JANE READ AND WRITE SO WELL? THE ANOMALY OF WOMEN'S ACHIEVEMENT , 1989 .

[15]  Sachi Mizobuchi,et al.  Investigating the Usability of the Stylus Pen on Handheld Devices , 2005 .

[16]  Eunil Park,et al.  Factors influencing users' employment of mobile map services , 2014, Telematics Informatics.

[17]  Eric Saund,et al.  Stylus input and editing without prior selection of mode , 2003, UIST '03.

[18]  Tomer Moscovich Multi-touch interaction , 2006, CHI EA '06.

[19]  Luis de-Marcos,et al.  An experiment with content distribution methods in touchscreen mobile devices. , 2015, Applied ergonomics.

[20]  Andreas Holzinger,et al.  Handwriting recognition on mobile devices: State of the art technology, usability and business analysis , 2011, Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Business.

[21]  Eunil Park,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model for the Use of Tablet PCs , 2013, Wireless Personal Communications.

[22]  X. Ren,et al.  The effects of PDA pen-length on the performance of older adults , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Active Media Technology, 2005. (AMT 2005)..

[23]  Monica M. C. Schraefel,et al.  The radial scroll tool: scrolling support for stylus- or touch-based document navigation , 2004, UIST '04.

[24]  Andreas Holzinger,et al.  On Using Entropy for Enhancing Handwriting Preprocessing , 2012, Entropy.

[25]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  Haptic feedback for pen computing: directions and strategies , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[26]  Steinar Kristoffersen,et al.  “Making place” to make IT work: empirical explorations of HCI for mobile CSCW , 1999, GROUP.

[27]  Angel P. del Pobil,et al.  The Effects of Multimodal Feedback and Gender on Task Performance of Stylus Pen Users , 2012 .

[28]  Darren Leigh,et al.  Haptic pen: a tactile feedback stylus for touch screens , 2004, UIST '04.

[29]  Koichi Mori,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Minimum Required Size and the Minimum Number of Targets for Pen Input on the Small Display , 2002, Mobile HCI.

[30]  David Goldberg,et al.  Touch-typing with a stylus , 1993, INTERCHI.

[31]  Chui Yin Wong,et al.  Aesthetics and virtual keyboard designs for PDAs , 2007, Mobility '07.

[32]  Sing-Tze Bow,et al.  Pattern recognition and image preprocessing , 1992 .

[33]  Andreas Holzinger,et al.  An investigation of finger versus stylus input in medical scenarios , 2008, ITI 2008 - 30th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces.

[34]  Michael Levine-Clark,et al.  Electronic Book Usage: A Survey at the University of Denver , 2006 .

[35]  Xiangshi Ren,et al.  An investigation of the usability of the stylus pen for various age groups on personal digital assistants , 2011, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[36]  Ching Y. Suen,et al.  The State of the Art in Online Handwriting Recognition , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[37]  Jun Rekimoto,et al.  TouchEngine: a tactile display for handheld devices , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.