State-Dependent and Timing-Dependent Bidirectional Associative Plasticity in the Human SMA-M1 Network

The supplementary motor area (SMA-proper) plays a key role in the preparation and execution of voluntary movements. Anatomically, SMA-proper is densely reciprocally connected to primary motor cortex (M1), but neuronal coordination within the SMA-M1 network and its modification by external perturbation are not well understood. Here we modulated the SMA-M1 network using MR-navigated multicoil associative transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects. Changes in corticospinal excitability were assessed by recording motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude bilaterally in a hand muscle. We found timing-dependent bidirectional Hebbian-like MEP changes during and for at least 30 min after paired associative SMA-M1 stimulation. MEP amplitude increased if SMA stimulation preceded M1 stimulation by 6 ms, but decreased if SMA stimulation lagged M1 stimulation by 15 ms. This associative plasticity in the SMA-M1 network was highly topographically specific because paired associative stimulation of pre-SMA and M1 did not result in any significant MEP change. Furthermore, associative plasticity in the SMA-M1 network was strongly state-dependent because it required priming by near-simultaneous M1 stimulation to occur. We conclude that timing-dependent bidirectional associative plasticity is demonstrated for the first time at the systems level of a human corticocortical neuronal network. The properties of this form of plasticity are fully compatible with spike-timing-dependent plasticity as defined at the cellular level. The necessity of priming may reflect the strong interhemispheric connectivity of the SMA-M1 network. Findings are relevant for better understanding reorganization and potentially therapeutic modification of neuronal coordination in the SMA-M1 network after cerebral lesions such as stroke.

[1]  L. Cohen,et al.  A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Synaptic development of the cerebral cortex: implications for learning, memory, and mental illness. , 1994, Progress in brain research.

[3]  A. Oliviero,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the supplementary motor area (SMA) degrades bimanual movement control in humans , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[4]  M. Hallett,et al.  What is the Bereitschaftspotential? , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  Peter T. Fox,et al.  Imaging human intra‐cerebral connectivity by PET during TMS , 1997, Neuroreport.

[6]  Thierry Wannier,et al.  Origins of callosal projections to the supplementary motor area (SMA): A direct comparison between pre‐SMA and SMA‐proper in macaque monkeys , 2002, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[7]  H. Lüders,et al.  Functional connectivity in human cortical motor system: a cortico-cortical evoked potential study. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  P. Strick,et al.  Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Increased corticospinal excitability after 5 Hz rTMS over the human supplementary motor area , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  Etienne Olivier,et al.  Short-Latency Influence of Medial Frontal Cortex on Primary Motor Cortex during Action Selection under Conflict , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Sukhvinder S. Obhi,et al.  rTMS to the supplementary motor area disrupts bimanual coordination. , 2002, Motor control.

[12]  J. Classen,et al.  Plasticity Resembling Spike-Timing Dependent Synaptic Plasticity: The Evidence in Human Cortex , 2010, Front. Syn. Neurosci..

[13]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Corticocortical connections of area F3 (SMA‐proper) and area F6 (pre‐SMA) in the macaque monkey , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  K. Sakai,et al.  Preferential activation of different I waves by transcranial magnetic stimulation with a figure-of-eight-shaped coil , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Modulating cortical connectivity in stroke patients by rTMS assessed with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling , 2010, NeuroImage.

[16]  Daniel T Willingham,et al.  Time-Specific Contribution of the Supplementary Motor Area to Intermanual Transfer of Procedural Knowledge , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  K. Zilles,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of the primate isocortical motor system , 2000, Anatomy and Embryology.

[18]  G. Zaccara,et al.  Physical interactions between induced electrical fields can have substantial effects on neuronal excitation during simultaneous TMS of two brain areas , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  Hidenao Fukuyama,et al.  Human motor associative plasticity induced by paired bihemispheric stimulation , 2009, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Changes in connectivity profiles define functionally distinct regions in human medial frontal cortex. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Jens Frahm,et al.  Subthreshold high-frequency TMS of human primary motor cortex modulates interconnected frontal motor areas as detected by interleaved fMRI-TMS , 2003, NeuroImage.

[22]  A. Nambu,et al.  Organization of nonprimary motor cortical inputs on pyramidal and nonpyramidal tract neurons of primary motor cortex: An electrophysiological study in the macaque monkey. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  Y. Dan,et al.  Spike timing-dependent plasticity: a Hebbian learning rule. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[24]  S. Swinnen,et al.  High-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation of the supplementary motor area reduces bimanual coupling during anti-phase but not in-phase movements , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  G. Fink,et al.  Cortical connectivity after subcortical stroke assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2008, Annals of neurology.

[26]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Multiple nonprimary motor areas in the human cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Cortical and subcortical interactions during action reprogramming and their related white matter pathways , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  Parcellation of human mesial area 6: cytoarchitectonic evidence for three separate areas , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[29]  John C. Rothwell,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Can Be Used to Test Connections to Primary Motor Areas from Frontal and Medial Cortex in Humans , 2001, NeuroImage.

[30]  M. Wiesendanger,et al.  Transcallosal connections of the distal forelimb representations of the primary and supplementary motor cortical areas in macaque monkeys , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  K Zilles,et al.  Anatomy and transmitter receptors of the supplementary motor areas in the human and nonhuman primate brain. , 1996, Advances in neurology.

[32]  I. Kermadi,et al.  Neuronal activity in the primate supplementary motor area and the primary motor cortex in relation to spatio-temporal bimanual coordination. , 1998, Somatosensory & motor research.

[33]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Interaction between intracortical inhibition and facilitation in human motor cortex. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  C. Kennard,et al.  Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[35]  P. Strick,et al.  Frontal Lobe Inputs to the Digit Representations of the Motor Areas on the Lateral Surface of the Hemisphere , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  C. Brinkman.  Supplementary motor area of the monkey's cerebral cortex: short- and long-term deficits after unilateral ablation and the effects of subsequent callosal section , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  Y. Dan,et al.  Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity of Neural Circuits , 2004, Neuron.

[38]  M. Torrens.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[39]  B. Payne,et al.  Thalamic and cortical projections to middle suprasylvian cortex of cats: constancy and variation , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  G. Bi,et al.  Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb's postulate revisited. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[41]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Convergence of human brain mapping tools: Neuronavigated TMS Parameters and fMRI activity in the hand motor area , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[42]  P. Strick,et al.  Frontal lobe inputs to primate motor cortex: evidence for four somatotopically organized ‘premotor’ areas , 1979, Brain Research.

[43]  H. Markram,et al.  Regulation of Synaptic Efficacy by Coincidence of Postsynaptic APs and EPSPs , 1997, Science.

[44]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Noradrenergic enhancement improves motor network connectivity in stroke patients , 2011, Annals of neurology.

[45]  R. Lemon,et al.  State of the art: Physiology of transcranial motor cortex stimulation , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[46]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  E. Kunesch,et al.  Timing‐dependent plasticity in human primary somatosensory cortex , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[48]  P Girlanda,et al.  Paired associative stimulation of left and right human motor cortex shapes interhemispheric motor inhibition based on a Hebbian mechanism. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[49]  Sang Won Seo,et al.  Defining functional SMA and pre-SMA subregions in human MFC using resting state fMRI: Functional connectivity-based parcellation method , 2010, NeuroImage.