From preposition to article

From Latin to French, an article took shape out of a preposition with a concrete spatial meaning. This paper highlights two crucial stages in the grammaticalization process leading from the preposition de to the so-called ‘partitive’ article: the Old French stage, which is the last prepositional stage of de, and the Middle French stage, where de is entering into the paradigm of articles. Two central issues are dealt with: (i) Why did French develop an article for indefinite non-singular reference, whereas most other languages endowed with an article system leave this type of reference unmarked? (ii) How can we, at the pre-article stage, account for the use of the preposition de in syntactic functions that are in principle incompatible with the use of a preposition? The study also reflects upon the theoretical postulate of gradualness of the grammaticalization process and raises the question of a possible correlation between a shift in morphosyntactic category and a discontinuity in evolution.

[1]  Christiane Marchello-Nizia,et al.  L'évolution du français : ordre des mots, démonstratifs, accent tonique , 1995 .

[2]  L. Renzi,et al.  Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione , 2001 .

[4]  Hana Filip,et al.  Aspect, Eventuality Types and Nominal Reference , 1999 .

[5]  Paul J. Hopper,et al.  On some principles of grammaticization , 1991 .

[6]  Martin Haspelmath,et al.  Does grammaticalization need reanalysis , 1998 .

[7]  Auguste Brachet,et al.  Grammaire historique de la langue française , 2022 .

[8]  Winfred P. Lehmann,et al.  A Structural Principle of Language and Its Implications. , 1973 .

[9]  Bernd Heine,et al.  Cognitive Foundations of Grammar , 1997 .

[10]  Richard B. Dasher,et al.  Regularity in Semantic Change , 2002 .

[11]  Ebbe Spang-Hanssen,et al.  Les prépositions incolores du français moderne , 1963 .

[12]  Joaquín Villalba Alvarez.  De causis linguae latinae , 2004 .

[13]  B. Woledge.  The Plural of the Indefinite Article in Old French , 1956 .

[14]  C. Buridant,et al.  Grammaire nouvelle de l'ancien français , 2000 .

[15]  K. Sandfeld.  Syntaxe du français contemporain , 1936 .

[16]  M. Goyens.  Emergence et évolution du syntagme nominal en français , 1994 .

[17]  B. Combettes.  Variation dans la structure du syntagme verbal , 2002 .

[18]  Eve Sweetser,et al.  Grammaticalization and Semantic Bleaching , 1988 .

[19]  C. Marchello-Nizia.  Les grammaticalisations ont-elles une cause ? Le cas de beaucoup, moult et très en moyen français , 2000 .

[20]  Maurice Gross,et al.  Sur une règle de "cacophonie" , 1967 .

[21]  A. Carlier,et al.  De l'ancien français au français moderne: régression du degré zéro de la détermination et restructuration du système des articles , 1998 .

[22]  Joseph H. Greenberg,et al.  Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements , 1990, On Language.

[23]  Annick Englebert,et al.  L'article partitif :: l'évolution des conditions d'emploi , 1996 .

[24]  Raphael Levy,et al.  From Latin to Modern French with especial consideration of Anglo-Norman. , 1935 .

[25]  B. Heine.  Grammaticalization as an explanatory parameter , 1994 .

[26]  Whitney Tabor,et al.  Structural Scope Expansion and Grammaticalization , 1998 .

[27]  Alan Timberlake.  3. Reanalysis and Actualization in Syntactic Change , 1977, Mechanisms of Syntactic Change.

[28]  A. Meillet,et al.  Traité de grammaire comparée des langues classiques , 1960 .

[29]  Matthew S. Dryer,et al.  Object-verb order and adjective-noun order: Dispelling a myth , 1988 .

[30]  M. Dryer.  On the Six-Way Word Order Typology , 1997 .