Modeling the anisotropic behavior of jointed rock mass using a modified smooth-joint model

This study proposes a modified smooth-joint model using the distinct element method (DEM) to simulate the anisotropic behavior of jointed rock mass. Instead of one fixed value for the friction angle, the proposed model adopts a relation of the roughness angle and the normal stress on the joint face to consider the effect of joint roughness and orientation on the shear strength. To simulate the behavior of jointed rock mass, two contact models: the parallel-bond model and the modified smooth-joint model, were used. The first model was used to simulate the cement between the particles, and the second model was applied to simulate the sliding effect on the joint face. The proposed model was validated with the experimental results of the artificial rock mass. The simulated results show that the failure modes of the rock mass, including the split mode, mixed mode, and sliding mode, could be fulfilled. The stress–strain curves in the various joint orientations were well simulated. Furthermore, compared with the existing joint models, the proposed model has better agreement with the experimental results, especially in the mixed and sliding modes.

[1]  J. C. Jaeger.  Shear Failure of Anistropic Rocks , 1960, Geological Magazine.

[2]  P. Cundall,et al.  A bonded-particle model for rock , 2004 .

[3]  C. Martin,et al.  A clumped particle model for rock , 2007 .

[4]  Yo-Ming Hsieh,et al.  Interpretations on how the macroscopic mechanical behavior of sandstone affected by microscopic properties—Revealed by bonded-particle model , 2008 .

[5]  Tsan-Hwei Huang,et al.  Effect of joint sets on the strength and deformation of rock mass models , 1998 .

[6]  Jae-Joon Song,et al.  Numerical simulation of a direct shear test on a rock joint using a bonded-particle model , 2009 .

[7]  G. Reik,et al.  STRENGTH AND DEFORMATION CHARACTERISTICS OF JOINTED MEDIA IN TRUE TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION , 1978 .

[8]  Peter A. Cundall,et al.  Numerical experiments on rough joints in shear using a bonded particle model , 2000 .

[9]  Diego Mas Ivars,et al.  The synthetic rock mass approach for jointed rock mass modelling , 2011 .

[10]  Tai-Tien Wang,et al.  A constitutive model for the deformation of a rock mass containing sets of ubiquitous joints , 2009 .

[11]  N. Barton,et al.  The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice , 1977 .

[12]  D U Deere,et al.  DESIGN OF TUNNEL LINERS AND SUPPORT SYSTEMS , 1969 .

[13]  B. Singh,et al.  Continuum characterization of jointed rock masses: Part I—The constitutive equations , 1973 .

[14]  E. T. Brown,et al.  EMPIRICAL STRENGTH CRITERION FOR ROCK MASSES , 1980 .

[15]  R. Yoshinaka,et al.  3. Joint stiffness and the deformation behaviour of discontinuous rock , 1986 .

[16]  Pinnaduwa Kulatilake,et al.  Physical and particle flow modeling of jointed rock block behavior under uniaxial loading , 2001 .

[17]  John Hadjigeorgiou,et al.  Stability analysis of vertical excavations in hard rock by integrating a fracture system into a PFC model , 2009 .

[18]  Evert Hoek,et al.  Strength of jointed rock masses , 1983 .