Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure at Lehigh: Large-Scale Real-time Multi-Directional Hybrid Simulation Experimental Facility

The Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI) Experimental Facility at Lehigh University, a National Science Foundation sponsored facility, will provide means to conduct research to mitigate the impact of natural hazards that includes earthquakes on structures. This facility provides experimental resources for accurate, large-scale, multi-directional simulations that enable the effects of natural hazard events on civil infrastructure systems with potential soil-foundation effects to be investigated. The facility’s experimental resources, including a strong floor, multi-directional reaction wall, static and dynamic actuators, and testing algorithms supports large-scale, multi-direction, real-time hybrid simulations that combine physical experiments with computer-based simulations for evaluating performance of large-scale components and systems. The types of laboratory simulations and tests enabled by the facility include: (1) hybrid simulation (HS), which combines large-scale physical models with computer-based numerical simulation models, (2) geographically distributed hybrid simulation (DHS), which is a HS with physical models and/or numerical simulation models located at different sites; (3) real-time hybrid earthquake simulation (RTHS), which is a HS conducted at the actual time scale of the physical models; (4) geographically distributed real-time hybrid earthquake simulation, which combines DHS and RTHS; (5) dynamic testing (DT), which loads large-scale physical models at real-time scales through predefined load histories; and (6) quasi-static testing (QS), which loads large-scale physical models at slow rates through predefined load histories. The facility resources enable multiple, large-scale simulations and tests to be conducted simultaneously, enabling numerous users to work concurrently without significant interruption. The large-scale hybrid simulations are a unique resource for system-level response data, since they enable the definition of the "system" to be expanded well beyond the size of typical laboratory physical models. At the same time, due to its large size, the facility accommodates large-scale physical models, which reduces scaling effects associated with typical, small physical models. A broad array of instrumentation, large-scale data acquisition systems, and advanced sensors provides the system-level data needed for advancing computational modeling and simulation. The new discoveries and knowledge from these simulations will enable researchers to develop and validate new hazard mitigation solutions, and innovative hazard-resistant structural concepts.

[1]  Edward Cohen,et al.  Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 1990 .

[2]  James M. Ricles,et al.  INELASTIC CYCLIC TESTING OF WELDED UNREINFORCED MOMENT CONNECTIONS , 2002 .

[3]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Development of improved welded moment connections for earthquake-resistant design , 2002 .

[4]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Reduced Beam Section Connections to Deep Columns , 2006 .

[5]  Cheng Chen Development and numerical simulation of hybrid effective force testing method , 2007 .

[6]  Cheng Chen,et al.  Implementation and Validation of the NEES Hybrid Simulation Infrastructure at Lehigh University's RTMD Facility , 2008 .

[7]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Real-Time Multi-Directional Hybrid Simulation of Building Piping Systems , 2008 .

[8]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Real-time large-scale hybrid testing for seismic performance evaluation of smart structuresOya , 2008 .

[9]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Data Model for Large-Scale Structural Experiments , 2008 .

[10]  J. Ricles,et al.  Development of Direct Integration Algorithms for Structural Dynamics Using Discrete Control Theory , 2008 .

[11]  O. Mercan,et al.  Real‐time hybrid testing using the unconditionally stable explicit CR integration algorithm , 2009 .

[12]  O. Mercan,et al.  Kinematic transformations for planar multi‐directional pseudodynamic testing , 2009 .

[13]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Real-Time Hybrid Simulation of a Steel MRF with Large Scale Passive Magneto-Rheological Fluid Dampers under Selected Ground Motions , 2011 .

[14]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Experimental evaluation of the seismic performance of steel MRFs with compressed elastomer dampers using large-scale real-time hybrid simulation , 2011 .

[15]  Clay Naito,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Pretopped Precast Diaphragm Critical Flexure Joint under Seismic Demands , 2011 .

[16]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Evaluation of a real-time hybrid simulation system for performance evaluation of structures with rate dependent devices subjected to seismic loading , 2012 .

[17]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Geographically Distributed Real-Time Hybrid Simulation of MR Dampers for Seismic Hazard Mitigation , 2012 .

[18]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Large‐scale real‐time hybrid simulation involving multiple experimental substructures and adaptive actuator delay compensation , 2012 .

[19]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  A framework for multi-site distributed simulation and application to complex structural systems , 2012 .

[20]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Real-time Hybrid Simulation Studies of Complex Large-Scale Systems Using Multi-Grid Processing , 2012 .

[21]  Richard Sause,et al.  Seismic Performance of Steel Self-Centering, Moment-Resisting Frame: Hybrid Simulations under Design Basis Earthquake , 2013 .

[22]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Adaptive time series compensator for delay compensation of servo‐hydraulic actuator systems for real‐time hybrid simulation , 2013 .

[23]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Large-Scale Experimental Studies of Structural Control Algorithms for Structures with Magnetorheological Dampers Using Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2013 .

[24]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Modeling of a large‐scale magneto‐rheological damper for seismic hazard mitigation. Part II: Semi‐active mode , 2013 .

[25]  S. Pessiki,et al.  Experimental Lateral Load Response of Unbonded Post-Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls , 2013 .

[26]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Large‐scale real‐time hybrid simulation of a three‐story steel frame building with magneto‐rheological dampers , 2014 .

[27]  Marcelo H. Kobayashi,et al.  Experimental and Analytical Study of Water-Driven Debris Impact Forces on Structures , 2014 .

[28]  Richard Sause,et al.  LATERAL LOAD BEHAVIOR OF A POST- TENSIONED COUPLED CORE WALL , 2014 .

[29]  J. Ricles,et al.  Development of a family of unconditionally stable explicit direct integration algorithms with controllable numerical energy dissipation , 2014 .

[30]  Richard Sause,et al.  Accurate real‐time hybrid earthquake simulations on large‐scale MDOF steel structure with nonlinear viscous dampers , 2015 .

[31]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Implementation and application of the unconditionally stable explicit parametrically dissipative KR‐α method for real‐time hybrid simulation , 2015 .

[32]  Karim Kazemi Bidokhti Large-Scale Real-Time Hybrid Simulation of Reinforced Concrete Structures , 2016 .