Low-Complexity MIMO Detection Using Post-Processing SINR Ordering and Partial K-Best Search

Linear detectors such as zero-forcing (ZF) and minimum mean square error (MMSE) require only a small fraction of computational complexity compared to maximum likelihood (ML) detector. However, linear detections suffer from severe performance degradation. In this paper, we propose a novel detection scheme which obtains the initial symbol detection by MMSE detector and then perform symbol ordering by signal-to-interference-and-noise ratio (SINR). The MMSE detected symbols with higher SINR are retained as part of final solution and cancelled from the original received signals. The remaining symbols with lower SINR are detected by K-best algorithm, which selects K best nodes in each layer of the partial tree search. The small value of K is sufficient to achieve good performances, and therefore the extra computational complexity is minimal. Simulation results show the performance superiority of the proposed method compared to the conventional MMSE detection. Moreover, at the similar symbol error rates, the total number of nodes visited in the proposed approach is much smaller than the conventional K-best detection scheme.

[1]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  On performance of the zero forcing receiver in presence of transmit correlation , 2002, Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory,.

[2]  Giuseppe Caire,et al.  On maximum-likelihood detection and the search for the closest lattice point , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  Takeshi Onizawa,et al.  A new signal detection scheme combining ZF and K-best algorithms for OFDM/SDM , 2004, 2004 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8754).

[4]  Claus-Peter Schnorr,et al.  Lattice Basis Reduction: Improved Practical Algorithms and Solving Subset Sum Problems , 1991, FCT.

[5]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Iterative (turbo) soft interference cancellation and decoding for coded CDMA , 1999, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[6]  Dirk Wübben,et al.  Near-maximum-likelihood detection of MIMO systems using MMSE-based lattice reduction , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).

[7]  Jun Won Choi,et al.  Towards the Performance of ML and the Complexity of MMSE - A Hybrid Approach , 2008, IEEE GLOBECOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[8]  Zhan Guo,et al.  Algorithm and implementation of the K-best sphere decoding for MIMO detection , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[9]  M. J. Gans,et al.  On Limits of Wireless Communications in a Fading Environment when Using Multiple Antennas , 1998, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[10]  Hyuncheol Park,et al.  Performance Analysis of MIMO System with Linear MMSE Receiver , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  Dirk Wübben,et al.  Reduced complexity MMSE detection for BLAST architectures , 2003, GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489).

[12]  U. Fincke,et al.  Improved methods for calculating vectors of short length in a lattice , 1985 .

[13]  Wei-Ho Chung,et al.  An improved MMSE-based MIMO detection using low-complexity constellation search , 2010, 2010 IEEE Globecom Workshops.

[14]  Babak Hassibi,et al.  On the sphere-decoding algorithm I. Expected complexity , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[15]  Anass Benjebbour,et al.  Comparison of ordered successive receivers for space-time transmission , 2001, IEEE 54th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC Fall 2001. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37211).