Modelling Offices Through Discourse Analysis: The SAMPO Approach

Successful office communication are vital for the effective working of organisation. There is, however, no agreement about how they should be studied or understood in analysing offices in office information system design. Instead, the majority of proposed methods for office information system design leave these aspects implicit and largely unexplored. In this paper, we propose framing office communication in terms of speech acts and conversations

[1]  Jianzhong Li,et al.  AMS: a knowledge-based approach to task representation, organization and coordination , 1988 .

[2]  Lawrence A. Rowe,et al.  A form application development system , 1982, SIGMOD '82.

[3]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[4]  Michael D. Zisman,et al.  Representation, specification and automation of office procedures , 1977 .

[5]  Ronald K. Stamper,et al.  Doing Business with Words: Performative Aspects of Deontic Systems , 1986 .

[6]  Gerald R. Barber Supporting organizational problem solving with a workstation , 1982 .

[7]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making , 1988, CSUR.

[8]  Brad Hartfield,et al.  Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction , 1988, TOIS.

[9]  Daniel Vanderveken,et al.  Foundations of Illocutionary Logic , 1985 .

[10]  Catherine Griffiths,et al.  Office Automation: A Social and Organizational Perspective , 1986, J. Inf. Technol..

[11]  Gerald Barber Supporting organizational problem solving with a workstation , 1982 .

[12]  B. Konsynski,et al.  A Model for Specification of Office Communications , 1982, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[13]  Dennis Tsichritzis,et al.  An office form flow model , 1980, AFIPS '80.

[14]  Fernando Flores,et al.  DOING AND SPEAKING IN THE OFFICE , 1980 .

[15]  Ravi Krishnamurthy,et al.  Office-by-example: an integrated office system and database manager , 1987, TOIS.

[16]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  A speech-act-based office modeling approach , 1988, TOIS.

[17]  R. Hirschheim,et al.  Critical issues in information systems research , 1987 .

[18]  Vincent Y. Lum,et al.  OPAS: An Office Procedure Automation System , 1982, IBM Syst. J..

[19]  Jianzhong Li,et al.  AMS: a knowledge-based approach to task representation, organization and coordination , 1988, COCS '88.

[20]  Robert Johansen,et al.  Groupware: Computer Support for Business Teams , 1988 .

[21]  Eleanor Herasimchuk Wynn,et al.  Office conversation as an information medium , 1979 .

[22]  LyytinenKalle,et al.  Action based model of information system , 1986 .

[23]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Understanding the office: A social-analytic perspective , 1986, TOIS.

[24]  Heinz K Klein Organizational implications of office systems: toward a critical social action perspective , 1986 .

[25]  I. Grief,et al.  Computer Supported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings , 1988 .

[26]  S. Kiesler The hidden messages in computer networks , 1986 .

[27]  J LyytinenKalle Implications of theories of language for information systems , 1985 .

[28]  Anatol W. Holt,et al.  Diplans: a new language for the study and implementation of coordination , 1988, TOIS.

[29]  A. Roger Kaye,et al.  Cooperating knowledge-based assistants for the office , 1987, TOIS.

[30]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Modelling Offices Through Discourse Analysis: A Comparison and Evaluation of SAMPO with OSSAD and ICN , 1992, Comput. J..

[31]  Dennis Tsichritzis,et al.  A data modeling approach for office information systems , 1983, TOIS.

[32]  H. Klein,et al.  The effectiveness of office information systems: a social action perspective , 1991, Inf. Syst. J..

[33]  Dieter Wunderlich,et al.  Methodological Remarks on Speech Act Theory , 1980 .

[34]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  FORMANAGER: an office forms management system , 1984, TOIS.

[35]  Moshé M. Zloof QBE/OBE: A Language for Office and Business Automation , 1981, Computer.

[36]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  PROCEDURES AND PROBLEMS IN THE OFFICE , 1984 .