An electromyographic analysis of functional differentiation in human pectoralis major muscle.

The aim of this investigation was to determine whether functional differentiation was present within the radiate muscle, pectoralis major, by determining whether motor units within individual muscular segments were independently controlled by the central nervous system (CNS) during a series of isometric muscle actions. Six miniature surface electrode pairs were placed along the origin of the pectoralis major of eight male subjects. Electromyographic (EMG) potentials were then recorded during isometric shoulder actions in various planes and at two levels of contraction intensity. The EMG waveforms were integrated (IEMG) and then normalized. The normalized IEMG waveforms (nIEMG) were then statistically compared to determine whether motor units within the detection area of each electrode pair had varied their contribution to the total activity of the muscle from one isometric action to another. An alteration in the contribution of each electrode site (muscular segment) to the total activity of the pectoralis major was taken to be indicative of functional differentiation. The results of this study indicated that the muscular segments of pectoralis major were controlled independently during performance of the isometric tasks. Isometric shoulder adduction saw moderate to high levels of activation expand from the inferior segments of the muscle to all segments, excluding the clavicular head, as the position of the upper limb changed from 90° to 0° of abduction. The most inferior muscular segments of pectoralis major were utilized preferentially when the subjects performed shoulder extension motions from a flexed shoulder position. Conversely, shoulder flexion motions utilized the superior segments of the muscle. Finally, horizontal flexion of the shoulder joint elicited activity from the middle segments of the muscle regardless of the degree of shoulder flexion. The results of this study support the notion that the CNS 'fine tunes' the activation patterns of muscular segments within pectoralis major to maximize the muscle's potential to contribute efficiently to isometric actions of the shoulder.

[1]  G L Soderberg,et al.  Electromyographic study of three parts of the gluteus medius muscle during functional activities. , 1978, Physical therapy.

[2]  C. C. A. M. Gielen,et al.  Changes in recruitment order of motor units in the human biceps muscle , 1982, Experimental Neurology.

[3]  Electromyographic investigation of the relative activity among four components of the triceps surae. , 1973 .

[4]  J. Brown,et al.  Further evidence of functional differentiation within biceps brachii. , 1993, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  Michael J. O'Donovan,et al.  Cat hindlimb motoneurons during locomotion. I. Destination, axonal conduction velocity, and recruitment threshold. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  J. Pauly,et al.  An electromyographic study of some muscles acting on the upper extremity of man , 1959, The Anatomical record.

[7]  R. Stein,et al.  Motor-unit recruitment in human first dorsal interosseous muscle for static contractions in three different directions. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Michael J. O'Donovan,et al.  Cat hindlimb motoneurons during locomotion. III. Functional segregation in sartorius. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  H. Christensen,et al.  Power spectrum and turns analysis of EMG at different voluntary efforts in normal subjects. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  A. English,et al.  Cat triceps surae motor nuclei are organized topologically , 1987, Experimental Neurology.

[11]  Jeffrey M. Schwartz,et al.  Functional differentiation within the tensor fasciae latae. A telemetered electromyographic analysis of its locomotor roles. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  C. Gielen,et al.  Relation between location of a motor unit in the human biceps brachii and its critical firing levels for different tasks , 1984, Experimental Neurology.

[13]  Lehmann Jf,et al.  Electromyographic study of the function of some muscles crossing the glenohumeral joint. , 1969 .

[14]  Michael J. O'Donovan,et al.  Cat hindlimb motoneurons during locomotion. II. Normal activity patterns. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  S L Wolf,et al.  Anatomical partitioning of three multiarticular human muscles. , 1991, Acta anatomica.

[16]  H. E. Desnedt,et al.  Spinal motoneuron recruitment in man: rank deordering with direction but not with speed of voluntary movement. , 1981, Science.

[17]  Basmajian Jv,et al.  Motor learning and control: a working hypothesis. , 1977 .

[18]  D. Peck,et al.  Density of muscle spindle profiles in the intrinsic forelimb muscles of the dog , 1990, Journal of morphology.

[19]  P. Matthews,et al.  Mammalian muscle receptors and their central actions , 1974 .

[20]  Electromyographic cross‐talk within a compartmentalized muscle of the cat. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  G. Somjen,et al.  Excitability and inhibitability of motoneurons of different sizes. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.