Does Popularity in Social Networks Influence Purchasing and Lifestyle Decisions? The Meaning Of Online Friendship

Abstract Nowadays, millions of people use social network sites (SNSs) to communicate with each other, but little is known about the real effects that online popularity (i.e., the number of friends on a SNS) has on users’ behaviors. This paper explores the social influence of SNSs and demonstrates that the number of online friends on an SNS does not influence its users’ purchasing and lifestyle choices. This study also reveals that so-called low-popular users (i.e., users with few friends on a SNS) are influenced by the intensity of their perceived friendships (i.e., how strong they perceive their relations with their online friends). On the contrary, high-popular users (i.e., users with many friends on a SNS) are influenced by their online friends’ perceived coolness (i.e., how “cool” they consider their online friends), and, in particular, their influence on purchasing decisions increases with the value of the products that they intend to buy. Results shed light on a new meaning of the term “friendship” on a SNS, which is substantially different from what is common in offline contexts: this new construct, which we call “Friendoolness”, can be intended as a mix of friendship and coolness (i.e., social attractiveness, likeability and desirability) and it is mainly based on taking actions to demonstrate that a person has a large number of “cool” friends.

[1]  Stephanie Tom Tong,et al.  The Role of Friends’ Appearance and Behavior on Evaluations of Individuals on Facebook: Are We Known by the Company We Keep? , 2008 .

[2]  Stephen Matthews,et al.  Identity and information technology , 2008 .

[3]  Andrea Hopmeyer,et al.  Sociometric Popularity and Peer-Perceived Popularity , 1998 .

[4]  J. Meek,et al.  Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: ‘It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work’ , 2009 .

[5]  Celia A. Brownell,et al.  Childhood Peer Relationships: Social Acceptance, Friendships, and Peer Networks. , 2003 .

[6]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[7]  M. Lowenthal,et al.  Intimacy and Crises in Adulthood , 1976 .

[8]  Why virtual friendship is no genuine friendship , 2012, Ethics and Information Technology.

[9]  E. Walster,et al.  The Effect of Physical Attractiveness on Teacher Expectations , 2012 .

[10]  Wayne Martino.  Mucking Around in Class, Giving Crap, and Acting Cool: Adolescent Boys Enacting Masculinities at School , 2000 .

[11]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[12]  J. Gaipa,et al.  Attraction and relevancy of attitude similarity-dissimilarity: Impersonal topics and friendship beliefs , 1971 .

[13]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence : a meta-analytic review , 1995 .

[14]  B. Libai,et al.  Social Effects on Customer Retention , 2011 .

[15]  J. Finn,et al.  Small Classes in the Early Grades, Academic Achievement, and Graduating From High School , 2005 .

[16]  Michael Trusov,et al.  Determining Influential Users in Internet Social Networks , 2010 .

[17]  Murray Krantz,et al.  Physical Attractiveness and Popularity: A Predictive Study , 1987 .

[18]  Emily Christofides,et al.  More Information than You Ever Wanted: Does Facebook Bring Out the Green-Eyed Monster of Jealousy? , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[19]  P. Olczak,et al.  Psychosocial maturity and interpersonal attraction , 1976 .

[20]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Social network size in humans , 2003, Human nature.

[21]  Chris L. Gibson,et al.  Investigating Friendship Quality: An Exploration of Self-Control and Social Control Theories’ Friendship Hypotheses , 2012, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[22]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[23]  Peter H. Reingen,et al.  Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior , 1987 .

[24]  Clive Nancarrow,et al.  An analysis of the concept of cool and its marketing implications , 2002 .

[25]  David Robins,et al.  Cool Rules: Anatomy of an Attitude , 2000 .

[26]  Taner Güney,et al.  The Snop Effect in the Consumption of Luxury Goods , 2012 .

[27]  Juliane M. Stopfer,et al.  Facebook Profiles Reflect Actual Personality, Not Self-Idealization , 2010, Psychological science.

[28]  Shelagh Ferguson.  A global culture of cool? Generation Y and their perception of coolness , 2011 .

[29]  Shelly Rodgers,et al.  Health Organizations’ Use of Facebook for Health Advertising and Promotion , 2011 .

[30]  A. Pellegrini,et al.  Dominance in Early Adolescent Boys: Affiliative and Aggressive Dimensions and Possible Functions , 2001 .

[31]  Andrew T. Stephen,et al.  Are Close Friends the Enemy? Online Social Networks, Self-Esteem, and Self-Control , 2013 .

[32]  J. Goldenberg,et al.  The Role of Hubs in the Adoption Process , 2009 .

[33]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Mirror, Mirror on my Facebook Wall: Effects of Exposure to Facebook on Self-Esteem , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[34]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship Between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[35]  Lawrence Feick,et al.  A Penny for Your Thoughts: Referral Reward Programs and Referral Likelihood: , 2007 .

[36]  Christophe Van den Bulte,et al.  Social Networks and Marketing , 2007 .

[37]  Jordi Casteleyn,et al.  Forum - How to Use Facebook in your Market Research , 2009 .

[38]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  Esteban Moro Egido,et al.  Affinity Paths and information diffusion in social networks , 2011, Soc. Networks.

[40]  Hui-Tzu Grace Chou,et al.  "They Are Happier and Having Better Lives than I Am": The Impact of Using Facebook on Perceptions of Others' Lives , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[41]  Luisa Doldi,et al.  Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth , 2009 .

[42]  Irene Alonso Aparicio,et al.  Recensión: "Theories in second language acquisition: an introduction. Van Patten, B. & Williams, J. (eds.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007" , 2008 .

[43]  Steven R. Asher,et al.  Friendship and Friendship Quality in Middle Childhood: Links with Peer Group Acceptance and Feelings of Loneliness and Social Dissatisfaction. , 1993 .

[44]  Shu-Chuan Chu.  Viral Advertising in Social Media , 2011 .

[45]  T. Farmer,et al.  Heterogeneity of popular boys: antisocial and prosocial configurations. , 2000, Developmental psychology.

[46]  Malcolm R. Parks.  Making Friends in Cyberspace , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[47]  Nick Southgate.  Coolhunting, account planning and the ancient cool of Aristotle , 2003 .

[48]  Dean Cocking,et al.  Unreal Friends , 2001, Ethics and Information Technology.

[49]  Paul R. Duberstein,et al.  Coolness: An Empirical Investigation , 2012 .

[50]  Taewon Suh,et al.  Social Institutional Explanations of Global Internet Diffusion: A Cross-Country Analysis , 2007, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[51]  M. Sarvary,et al.  Network Effects and Personal Influences: The Diffusion of an Online Social Network , 2011 .

[52]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students’ Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation 1 , 2009 .

[53]  D. Blyth.  Surviving and thriving in the social world: A commentary on six new studies of popular, rejected, and neglected children. , 1983 .

[54]  L. Johnson,et al.  A Review and a Conceptual Framework of Prestige-Seeking Consumer Behavior , 1999 .

[55]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[56]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Social influence: compliance and conformity. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.