Risk Perception and Affect

Humans perceive and act on risk in two fundamental ways. Risk as feelings refers to individuals' instinctive and intuitive reactions to danger. Risk as analysis brings logic, reason, and scientific deliberation to bear on risk management. Reliance on risk as feelings is described as “the affect heuristic.” This article traces the development of this heuristic and discusses some of the important ways that it impacts how people perceive and evaluate risk.

[1]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Ellen Peters,et al.  The Functions of Affect in Health Communications and in the Construction of Health Preferences , 2006 .

[3]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Numeracy and Decision Making , 2022 .

[4]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  An Emotion‐Based Model of Risk Perception and Stigma Susceptibility: Cognitive Appraisals of Emotion, Affective Reactivity, Worldviews, and Risk Perceptions in the Generation of Technological Stigma † , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  G. Gigerenzer.  Dread Risk, September 11, and Fatal Traffic Accidents , 2004, Psychological science.

[6]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  Recent EFFECTS OF FEAR AND ANGER ON PERCEIVED RISKS OF TERRORISMA National Field Experiment , 2015 .

[8]  C. Sunstein.  Terrorism and Probability Neglect , 2003 .

[9]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[10]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Money, Kisses, and Electric Shocks: On the Affective Psychology of Risk , 2001, Psychological science.

[11]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Sadness and Susceptibility to Judgmental Bias: The Case of Anchoring , 2000, Psychological science.

[13]  J. Lerner,et al.  Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice , 2000 .

[14]  P. Slovic,et al.  Violence Risk Assessment and Risk Communication: The Effects of Using Actual Cases, Providing Instruction, and Employing Probability Versus Frequency Formats , 2000, Law and human behavior.

[15]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  Insensitivity to the Value of Human Life: A Study of Psychophysical Numbing , 1997 .

[16]  P. Slovic,et al.  A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  S. Epstein.  Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[18]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[19]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[20]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[21]  S. Epstein,et al.  Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.