Efficacy and tolerability of 5-aminolevulinic acid 0.5% liposomal spray and intense pulsed light in wrinkle reduction of photodamaged skin

Abstract Background: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is effective for the treatment of photoaging. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PDT using a novel 0.5% liposome-encapsulated 5-ALA spray and an intense pulsed light (IPL) system (Ellipse Flex PPT) in reduction of periorbital and nasolabial wrinkles. Patients and Methods: Thirty healthy volunteers, aged 35–65 years, skin type I–III, with type 2 photoaging underwent a baseline visit, three ALA-IPL treatments once every 3 weeks, an end-of-treatment visit and a final visit 3 months after the end-of-treatment visit. Wrinkle depth was evaluated according to the modified Fitzpatrick wrinkle scale (MFWS). At the final visit, patients rated their degree of overall improvement. Results: For periorbital and nasolabial wrinkles, the differences of the average MFWS evaluation between baseline versus end-of-treatment visit, baseline versus final visit and end-of-treatment visit versus final visit were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The average overall improvement was greater for periorbital than for nasolabial wrinkles (p < 0.001). No side effects were observed during and after treatment. The degree of overall improvement was scored as excellent by 47% of the volunteers. Conclusions: ALA-IPL treatment using 0.5% liposome-encapsulated 5-ALA spray and Ellipse Flex PPT system is effective and safe for the treatment of type 2 photoaging reducing the PDT-associated side effects.

[1]  S. Chang,et al.  0.5% Liposome-encapsulated 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) photodynamic therapy for acne treatment , 2011, Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy : official publication of the European Society for Laser Dermatology.

[2]  A. Katsambas,et al.  Photoaging: prevention and topical treatments. , 2010, American journal of clinical dermatology.

[3]  P. Bjerring,et al.  Photodynamic therapy of acne vulgaris using 5‐aminolevulinic acid 0.5% liposomal spray and intense pulsed light in combination with topical keratolytic agents , 2010, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[4]  Michael Landthaler,et al.  Intense pulsed light (IPL): A review , 2010, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[5]  C. Mandarim-de-Lacerda,et al.  Photorejuvenation with Topical Methyl Aminolevulinate and Red Light: A Randomized, Prospective, Clinical, Histopathologic, and Morphometric Study , 2010, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[6]  Eun-So Lee,et al.  Photorejuvenation induced by 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy in patients with actinic keratosis: a histologic analysis. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[7]  A. Shamban,et al.  Current and New Treatments of Photodamaged Skin , 2009, Facial plastic surgery : FPS.

[8]  D. Kouba,et al.  Review of Fractional Photothermolysis: Treatment Indications and Efficacy , 2009, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[9]  P. Bjerring,et al.  Skin fluorescence controlled photodynamic photorejuvenation (wrinkle reduction) , 2009, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[10]  H. C. de Vijlder,et al.  Liposomes in dermatology today , 2009, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[11]  S. Monstrey,et al.  The Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale: A Clinical Validated Measurement Tool for Nasolabial Wrinkle Severity Assessment , 2008, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[12]  M. Gold,et al.  Skin rejuvenation in Asian skin: the analysis of clinical effects and basic mechanisms of intense pulsed light. , 2008, Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD.

[13]  M. Landthaler,et al.  Variable pulsed light is less painful than light-emitting diodes for topical photodynamic therapy of actinic keratosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial. , 2007, The British journal of dermatology.

[14]  P. Bjerring,et al.  5‐ALA for photodynamic photorejuvenation—optimization of treatment regime based on normal‐skin fluorescence measurements , 2007, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[15]  M. Venturini,et al.  Clinical and echographic analysis of photodynamic therapy using methylaminolevulinate as sensitizer in the treatment of photodamaged facial skin , 2007, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[16]  M. Goldman,et al.  Aminolevulinic acid-photodynamic therapy for photorejuvenation. , 2007, Dermatologic clinics.

[17]  M. Gold,et al.  Split‐Face Comparison of Photodynamic Therapy with 5‐Aminolevulinic Acid and Intense Pulsed Light Versus Intense Pulsed Light Alone for Photodamage , 2006, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[18]  E. Ross Laser versus intense pulsed light: Competing technologies in dermatology , 2006, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[19]  M. Alam,et al.  Treatment of photoaging with topical aminolevulinic acid and light. , 2004, Skin therapy letter.

[20]  C. Raulin,et al.  IPL technology: A review , 2003, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[21]  R. Ruiz-Rodríguez,et al.  Photodynamic Photorejuvenation , 2002, Dermatologic Surgery.

[22]  N. Lawrence,et al.  Photodynamic photorejuvenation. Commentary , 2002 .

[23]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Pulsed carbon dioxide laser, trichloroacetic acid, Baker-Gordon phenol, and dermabrasion: a comparative clinical and histologic study of cutaneous resurfacing in a porcine model. , 1996, Archives of dermatology.