Electromechanical response of 1–3 piezoelectric composites: An analytical model

Abstract An analytical model that captures the complete electromechanical response of a 1–3 piezoelectric composite system where both the matrix and fiber phases are, in general, elastically anisotropic and piezoelectrically active is developed. Upon identifying 36 classes of 1–3 composites based on the nature of the isotropy and the piezoelectric properties of the constituents, a detailed methodology for determining all the 45 independent material constants of a general 1–3 composite is presented. By comparing the predictions of the analytical model with that of a finite element model for a range of composite materials, it is demonstrated that the composite material properties in the longitudinal direction (i.e., C33, κ33 and e33) are well predicted by the analytical model. However, as a consequence of the approximation introduced in the model formulation (where the fiber composite is modeled as a layered composite) the analytical model could significantly underpredict the composite material properties in the transverse direction (especially the dielectric properties, κ11 and κ22) for some (“matrix-dominant”) composite material systems.

[1]  J. Whitney,et al.  Elastic properties of fiber reinforced composite materials. , 1966 .

[2]  Robert Bruce Lindsay,et al.  Physical Properties of Crystals , 1957 .

[3]  Paolo Bisegna,et al.  On methods for bounding the overall properties of periodic piezoelectric fibrous composites , 1997 .

[4]  Paolo Bisegna,et al.  Variational bounds for the overall properties of piezoelectric composites , 1996 .

[5]  Helen L. W. Chan,et al.  Effect of poling procedure on the properties of lead zirconate titanate/vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene composites , 1999 .

[6]  S. Suresh,et al.  A comprehensive unit cell model: a study of coupled effects in piezoelectric 1–3 composites , 2000 .

[7]  R. Kar-Gupta,et al.  Electromechanical response of 1-3 piezoelectric composites: Effect of poling characteristics , 2005 .

[8]  J. Unsworth,et al.  Simple model for piezoelectric ceramic/polymer 1-3 composites used in ultrasonic transducer applications , 1989 .

[9]  W. A. Smith,et al.  Modeling 1-3 composite piezoelectrics: hydrostatic response , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  L. E. Cross,et al.  Connectivity and piezoelectric-pyroelectric composites , 1978 .

[11]  B. Auld,et al.  Modeling 1-3 composite piezoelectrics: thickness-mode oscillations , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  Julián Bravo-Castillero,et al.  Overall properties of piezocomposite materials 1–3 , 2001 .

[13]  S. Tsai,et al.  Introduction to composite materials , 1980 .

[14]  H. Chan,et al.  Electromechanical properties of 1-3 piezoelectric ceramic/piezoelectric polymer composites , 1994 .

[15]  C. Nan,et al.  Influence of polarization orientation on the effective properties of piezoelectric composites , 2000 .

[16]  Matthias Sester,et al.  Effective properties of composites with embedded piezoelectric fibres , 1999 .

[17]  Martin L. Dunn,et al.  Micromechanics predictions of the effective electroelastic moduli of piezoelectric composites , 1993 .