The SELMA study: a birth cohort study in Sweden following more than 2000 mother-child pairs.

BACKGROUND  This paper describes the background, aim and study design for the Swedish SELMA study that aimed to investigate the importance of early life exposure during pregnancy and infancy to environmental factors with a major focus on endocrine disrupting chemicals for multiple chronic diseases/disorders in offspring. METHODS The cohort was established by recruiting women in the 10th week of pregnancy. Blood and urine from the pregnant women and the child and air and dust from home environment from pregnancy and infancy period have been collected. Questionnaires were used to collect information on life styles, socio-economic status, living conditions, diet and medical history. RESULTS Of the 8394 reported pregnant women, 6658 were invited to participate in the study. Among the invited women, 2582 (39%) agreed to participate. Of the 4076 (61%) non-participants, 2091 women were invited to a non-respondent questionnaire in order to examine possible selection bias. We found a self-selection bias in the established cohort when compared with the non-participant group, e.g. participating families did smoke less (14% vs. 19%), had more frequent asthma and allergy symptoms in the family (58% vs. 38%), as well as higher education among the mothers (51% vs. 36%) and more often lived in single-family houses (67% vs. 60%). CONCLUSIONS These findings indicate that the participating families do not fully represent the study population and thus, the exposure in this population. However, there is no obvious reason that this selection bias will have an impact on identification of environmental risk factors.

[1]  E. Ha,et al.  Relationship Between Maternal Mid Pregnancy Folate Levels and the Risk of Allergic and Respiratory Diseases in Early Childhood: The Mothers and Children’s Environmental Health (MOCEH) Study , 2013 .

[2]  S. Greenland,et al.  Estimating Bias From Loss to Follow-up in the Danish National Birth Cohort , 2011, Epidemiology.

[3]  M. Kogevinas,et al.  European Birth Cohorts for Environmental Health Research , 2011, Environmental health perspectives.

[4]  Niels Jørgensen,et al.  Shorter Anogenital Distance Predicts Poorer Semen Quality in Young Men in Rochester, New York , 2011, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  Jacek Namieśnik,et al.  Monitoring VOCs in atmospheric air II. Sample collection and preparation , 2010 .

[6]  K. Korach,et al.  Physiological effects and mechanisms of action of endocrine disrupting chemicals that alter estrogen signaling , 2010, Hormones.

[7]  John D Meeker,et al.  Exposure to environmental endocrine disrupting compounds and men's health. , 2010, Maturitas.

[8]  Laura N. Vandenberg,et al.  Flawed experimental design reveals the need for guidelines requiring appropriate positive controls in endocrine disruption research. , 2010, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[9]  C. Bornehag,et al.  Phthalate exposure and asthma in children. , 2010, International journal of andrology.

[10]  B. Weiss,et al.  Associations between indoor environmental factors and parental-reported autistic spectrum disorders in children 6-8 years of age. , 2009, Neurotoxicology.

[11]  John Peterson Myers,et al.  A Clash of Old and New Scientific Concepts in Toxicity, with Important Implications for Public Health , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[12]  L. Giudice,et al.  Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. , 2009, Endocrine reviews.

[13]  J. Heindel,et al.  Role of nutrition and environmental endocrine disrupting chemicals during the perinatal period on the aetiology of obesity , 2009, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[14]  B. Strandberg,et al.  Observations on persistent organic pollutants in indoor and outdoor air using passive polyurethane foam samplers. , 2008 .

[15]  Shuk-Mei Ho,et al.  Chapel Hill bisphenol A expert panel consensus statement: integration of mechanisms, effects in animals and potential to impact human health at current levels of exposure. , 2007, Reproductive toxicology.

[16]  Jan Sundell,et al.  How valid are parents' questionnaire responses regarding building characteristics, mouldy odour, and signs of moisture problems in Swedish homes? , 2007, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[17]  Graham A. Colditz,et al.  Merging and emerging cohorts: Not worth the wait , 2007, Nature.

[18]  P. Magnus,et al.  Cohort profile: the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[19]  M. Seguí-Gómez,et al.  Predictors of follow-up and assessment of selection bias from dropouts using inverse probability weighting in a cohort of university graduates , 2006, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[20]  N. Åberg,et al.  'Dampness' at home and its association with airway, nose, and skin symptoms among 10,851 preschool children in Sweden: a cross-sectional study. , 2005, Indoor air.

[21]  R. Kruse,et al.  Decrease in Anogenital Distance among Male Infants with Prenatal Phthalate Exposure , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[22]  T Sigsgaard,et al.  The dustfall collector--a simple passive tool for long-term collection of airborne dust: a project under the Danish Mould in Buildings program (DAMIB). , 2005, Indoor air.

[23]  G. Ziem,et al.  Pesticide Spraying and Health Effects , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[24]  M. Kogevinas,et al.  Collaboration is needed to co-ordinate European birth cohort studies. , 2004, International journal of epidemiology.

[25]  J. Golding The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)--study design and collaborative opportunities. , 2004, European journal of endocrinology.

[26]  J Sundell,et al.  Dampness in buildings and health (DBH): Report from an ongoing epidemiological investigation on the association between indoor environmental factors and health effects among children in Sweden. , 2004, Indoor air.

[27]  Charles J. Weschler,et al.  The Association between Asthma and Allergic Symptoms in Children and Phthalates in House Dust: A Nested Case–Control Study , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[28]  H. Sørensen,et al.  The Danish National Birth Cohort - its background, structure and aim , 2001, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[29]  D. Strachan,et al.  International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC): rationale and methods. , 1995, The European respiratory journal.

[30]  C. Osmond,et al.  INFANT MORTALITY, CHILDHOOD NUTRITION, AND ISCHAEMIC HEART DISEASE IN ENGLAND AND WALES , 1986, The Lancet.

[31]  Amir Miodovnik,et al.  Environmental neurotoxicants and developing brain. , 2011, The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York.

[32]  C. Bornehag,et al.  The Full Chain Model Following SVOCs Indoor From Sources to Health Effects , 2011 .

[33]  R. Rudel,et al.  Endocrine disrupting chemicals in indoor and outdoor air. , 2009, Atmospheric environment.

[34]  Phil A. Silva,et al.  The Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study: a 15 year longitudinal study. , 1990, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.