Deep learning–based image restoration algorithm for coronary CT angiography
暂无分享,去创建一个
K. Awai | Y. Kihara | Yujie Lu | Yuko Nakamura | T. Higaki | F. Tatsugami | T. Kitagawa | Zhou Yu | Jian Zhou | C. Fujioka | M. Iida | Chikako Fujioka
[1] Marios Anthimopoulos,et al. Lung Pattern Classification for Interstitial Lung Diseases Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[2] Yi Fan,et al. Noise simulation for low-dose computed tomography , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).
[3] C. Pal,et al. Deep Learning: A Primer for Radiologists. , 2017, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[4] Xuanqin Mou,et al. Low-Dose CT Image Denoising Using a Generative Adversarial Network With Wasserstein Distance and Perceptual Loss , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[5] Konstantin Nikolaou,et al. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[6] Hiroyuki Yoshida,et al. CAD in CT colonography without and with oral contrast agents: Progress and challenges , 2007, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..
[7] C. E. Kahn. From Images to Actions: Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence in Radiology. , 2017, Radiology.
[8] E. Ueno,et al. Vascular diameter measurement in CT angiography: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction and standard filtered back projection algorithms in vitro. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[9] James S Babb,et al. Multi-detector row CT attenuation measurements: assessment of intra- and interscanner variability with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom. , 2007, Radiology.
[10] Fuminari Tatsugami,et al. Evaluation of a body mass index-adapted protocol for low-dose 64-MDCT coronary angiography with prospective ECG triggering. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[11] Bernd Hamm,et al. Image Quality of Noninvasive Coronary Angiography Using Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography and Electron-beam Computed Tomography: Intraindividual Comparison in an Animal Model , 2004, Investigative radiology.
[12] C. Herzog,et al. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. , 2007, Radiology.
[13] K. Awai,et al. Coronary Artery Stent Evaluation with Model-based Iterative Reconstruction at Coronary CT Angiography. , 2017, Academic radiology.
[14] Sebastian Feuerlein,et al. New iterative reconstruction techniques for cardiovascular computed tomography: how do they work, and what are the advantages and disadvantages? , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.
[15] K. Dreyer,et al. When Machines Think: Radiology's Next Frontier. , 2017, Radiology.
[16] Thomas Frauenfelder,et al. Deep Learning in Mammography: Diagnostic Accuracy of a Multipurpose Image Analysis Software in the Detection of Breast Cancer , 2017, Investigative radiology.
[17] S. Bauer,et al. A survey of MRI-based medical image analysis for brain tumor studies , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.
[18] Yasutaka Baba,et al. Neointimal formation after carotid artery stenting: phantom and clinical evaluation of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) , 2018, European Radiology.
[19] Jörg Hausleiter,et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. , 2009, JAMA.
[20] Hu Chen,et al. Low-dose CT via convolutional neural network. , 2017, Biomedical optics express.
[21] J. Leipsic,et al. State of the Art: Iterative CT Reconstruction Techniques. , 2015, Radiology.
[22] G. Raff,et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.