Photosynthesis in modulated light: Quantitative dependence of photosynthetic enhancement on flashing rate

In order to predict the potential benefit associated with mixing devices designed to introduce periodic light modulations in dense cultures of microalgae, it is necessary to develop a quantitative understanding of the relationship between the frequency of the modulations and the resulting photosynthetic efficiency enhancement. To explore this relationship, the photosynthetic rate of cells of Phaeodactylum tricornutum from a dense steady state culture was determined as a function of modulation frequency, intensity of light received, and the proportion of the total cycle period during which the cells were illuminated. At high flash frequencies, the photosynthetic rate was determined by the average intensity received by the cells (full light intensity integration), while at low frequencies the cells responded to the instantaneous intensity (no light intensity integration). Full integration was approached asymptotically with increasing flash frequency. The frequency response could be described by a rectangular hyperbola, and the parameters of this hyperbola were nearly independent of the illumination intensity and the flash proportion. The saturation constant of the hyperbola, at which the response is one‐half of the maximum, was 0.67 Hz.

[1]  J. Franck,et al.  Photosynthesis in Flashing Light. , 1941 .

[2]  C. I. Powell,et al.  The motion of algae in turbulent flow , 1965 .

[3]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  Statistics for experimenters : an introduction to design, data analysis, and model building , 1979 .

[4]  John S. Burlew,et al.  Algal culture from laboratory to pilot plant. , 1953 .

[5]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building. , 1979 .

[6]  W. Giger,et al.  Re-evaluation of published data on the relative photosynthetic efficiency of intermittent and continuous light. , 1980 .

[7]  S. Pirt,et al.  Energetics of Photosynthetic Algal Growth: Influence of Intermittent Illumination in Short (40 s) Cycles , 1981 .

[8]  Trevor Platt,et al.  Mathematical formulation of the relationship between photosynthesis and light for phytoplankton , 1976 .

[9]  E. Laws,et al.  A simple algal production system designed to utilize the flashing light effect , 1983, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  P. Tett,et al.  Problems in Modelling the Photosynthesis-Light Relationship for Phytoplankton , 1981 .

[11]  T. T. Bannister.  Quantitative description of steady state, nutrient‐saturated algal growth, including adaptation , 1979 .

[12]  E L Smith,et al.  Photosynthesis in Relation to Light and Carbon Dioxide. , 1936, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  J. Myers,et al.  Growth Rate of Chlorella in Flashing Light. , 1954, Plant physiology.

[14]  H. M. Tsuchiya,et al.  Hydromechanical method to increase efficiency of algal photosynthesis. , 1964 .