Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Craniosynostosis

Diagnosis of craniosynostosis is based on clinical aspects but may be difficult in some cases where characteristic features are missing and radiographic imaging is necessary. In this context near-field high-frequency ultrasound has been used to evaluate the sonographic characteristics of synostotic sutures and its potential confirming the correct diagnosis. Sutures of 26 infants, aged 2-7 months, were investigated by ultrasound (Siemens Elegra, 7.5 MHz linear scanner). Sonographic features of synostotic sutures were correlated to CT imaging and compared to the sonographic and histopathological findings of normal cranial sutures. Hyperechogenic bridging of sutures with or without ridging were the characteristic aspects of synostotic sutures. All 26 patients could be reliable diagnosed showing partial (n = 21) or total fusion (n = 5) of one or more sutures consisting with craniosynostosis. Length of synostosis was identified exactly by sonography and imaging found to enable a classification of ultrastructural details of bony and soft tissue next to the synostotic suture. Ultrasound is a less expensive, nonradiating and easy-to-handle tool ensuring the diagnosis of craniosynostosis. Sonography offers the potential to be a standard investigation for infants with head deformities suspecting a suture pathology and has been therefore integrated in our craniofacial outpatient clinic as a daily routine method.

[1]  R. Hayward,et al.  Are routine preoperative CT scans necessary in the management of single suture craniosynostosis? , 2002, British journal of neurosurgery.

[2]  B. Wall Radiation protection dosimetry for diagnostic radiology patients. , 2004, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[3]  M. Westphal,et al.  Intraoperative sonography of intra- and extramedullary tumors. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  M. Westphal,et al.  Ultrasound-guided surgery of deep seated brain lesions. , 2000, European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[5]  J. Haaga,et al.  Radiation dose management: weighing risk versus benefit. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  E. Hall,et al.  Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[7]  D. Brenner,et al.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  E. Sauerbrei,et al.  Sonography of normal cranial sutures. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  L A Opperman,et al.  Cranial sutures as intramembranous bone growth sites , 2000, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[10]  T. Slovis,et al.  Children, computed tomography radiation dose, and the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) concept. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[11]  H. Losken,et al.  Ultrasound diagnosis of craniosynostosis. , 2002, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[12]  E. Weinberger,et al.  Ultrasound screening of the lambdoid suture in the child with posterior plagiocephaly , 2003, Pediatric Radiology.

[13]  D. Norman,et al.  Computerized tomography of cranial sutures. Part 1: Comparison of suture anatomy in children and adults. , 1984, Journal of neurosurgery.

[14]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Value of computed tomography in the evaluation of craniosynostosis. , 1982, Computerized radiology : official journal of the Computerized Tomography Society.

[15]  M. Benz,et al.  Reduction of cancer risk associated with pediatric computed tomography by the development of new technologies. , 2004, Pediatrics.

[16]  E. Sauerbrei,et al.  High-resolution sonography of the abnormal cranial suture , 1998, Pediatric Radiology.