Improving Product Development through Front-Loading and Enhanced Iteration Management

Iteration is a central issue in the management of product development (PD) projects. Iteration is often recognized as a major source of increased PD lead-time and cost, a key driver of schedule risk, and a source of major uncertainties in the commitment of resources. However, iteration, when planned and managed effectively, can overcome the uncertainties inherent in interdependent development activities and thus, improve and accelerate PD projects. Based on case study insights, we argue that effective iteration management not only entails the elimination of unnecessary iterative loops due to ill-defined process structures but also a combination of iteration front-loading and iteration end-front separation. As such, this work complements the front-loading principles from the Lean PD literature by providing an alternative approach based upon improved iteration management. First, we use the design structure matrix to identify sets of iterative loops and then, we apply a binary ordering algorithm to front-load iterations within each loop set. Finally, we evaluate the process structure performance to quantify the iteration impact on the overall project completion time and identify the optimal PD process structure. The paper concludes with avenues for future research.

[1]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[2]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A simulation-based process model for managing complex design projects , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[3]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[4]  Wei Chen,et al.  Project scheduling for collaborative product development using DSM , 2003 .

[5]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[6]  Birgit Verworn,et al.  The Fuzzy Front End of Japanese New Product Development Projects: Impact on Success and Differences between Incremental and Radical Projects , 2007 .

[7]  Juite Wang,et al.  An overlapping process model to assess schedule risk for new product development , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[8]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Planning Concurrency and Managing Iteration in Projects , 2001 .

[9]  T. Fujimoto,et al.  The Effect of “ Front-Loading ” Problem-Solving on Product Development Performance , 2000 .

[10]  D. V. Steward Systems Analysis and Management: Structure, Strategy and Design , 1981 .

[11]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Modeling and analyzing cost, schedule, and performance in complex system product development , 1998 .

[12]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[13]  Durward Kenneth Sobek Principles that shape product development systems : a Toyota-Chrysler comparison , 1997 .

[14]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  A method for systems design using precedence relationships: an application to automotive brake systems , 1990 .

[15]  Evan L. Porteus,et al.  Optimal Timing of Reviews in Concurrent Design for Manufacturability , 1995 .

[16]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A predictive model of sequential iteration in engineering design , 1997 .

[17]  Wei-Chih Wang,et al.  Modeling of design iterations through simulation , 2006 .

[18]  Charles R. Standridge,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of Manufacturing Systems , 1993 .