Uncertainty and Political Perceptions

While the world of politics is uncertain, previous work, both theoretical and empirical, has largely failed to incorporate this uncertainty into the analysis of public opinion and electoral behavior. In this article we discuss measures designed to elicit the uncertainty survey respondents feel about their political perceptions. These measures exhibit response patterns which are interpretable, substantively interesting, and consistent with a model relating uncertainty to citizen information costs. We also find that variation in respondent uncertainty leads to different models of perception of political figures and speaks to models of the survey response. As a practical matter, our measures can easily be incorporated into existing surveys with no disruption of continuity.

[1]  C. Franklin Eschewing Obfuscation? Campaigns and the Perception of U.S. Senate Incumbents , 1991, American Political Science Review.

[2]  J. Zaller Bringing Converse Back In: Modeling Information Flow in Political Campaigns , 1989, Political Analysis.

[3]  Steven E. Finkel,et al.  Reexamining the "Minimal Effects" Model in Recent Presidential Campaigns , 1993, The Journal of Politics.

[4]  J. Tobin Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables , 1958 .

[5]  John Zaller,et al.  Information, Values, and Opinion , 1991, American Political Science Review.

[6]  Benjamin I. Page Choices and echoes in Presidential elections , 1978 .

[7]  J. Stanley Quasi-Experimentation , 1965, The School Review.

[8]  Jeffrey A. Dubin,et al.  Selection Bias in Linear Regression, Logit and Probit Models , 1989 .

[9]  R. McKelvey,et al.  A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables , 1975 .

[10]  Larry M. Bartels Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice , 1988 .

[11]  A. Downs An Economic Theory of Democracy , 1957 .

[12]  James M. Enelow,et al.  The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction , 1984 .

[13]  Stephen Ansolabehere,et al.  The Nature of Utility Functions in Mass Publics , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[14]  Thomas R. Palfrey,et al.  The Relationship Between Information, Ideology, and Voting Behavior , 1987 .

[15]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[16]  S. Feldman,et al.  A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences , 1992 .

[17]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  The Measurement of Public Opinion about Public Policy: A Report on Some New Issue Question Formats* , 1982 .

[18]  Larry M. Bartels Issue Voting Under Uncertainty: An Empirical Test , 1986 .

[19]  K. Shepsle The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[20]  James M. Enelow,et al.  A New Approach to Voter Uncertainty in the Downsian Spatial Model , 1981 .