An Iterative-Mode Scan Design of Terrestrial Laser Scanning in Forests for Minimizing Occlusion Effects

Occlusion effect, an inherent problem of terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) measurements, limits the potential of TLS data in tree attribute estimation. Multiple scans seek to mitigate this effect to provide enhanced scan completeness. However, the numbers and locations of the scans (i.e., the scan design) are usually determined via a subjective assessment of the tree density, spatial patterns of trees, and attributes to be derived. These could cause suboptimal scan completeness and limit tree attribute estimation. This study proposed an iterative-mode scan design to minimize the occlusion effect. First, we introduced a PoTo index based on visibility analysis to evaluate how many trees can be scanned from a location and to select effective candidates for the optimal TLS location. Second, we introduced a cumulative degree of ring closure (CDRC) to quantify the scan completeness for each candidate and determine the optimal TLS location. The TLS data sets of virtual forests with field-measured and synthetic plot parameter settings were simulated according to iterative- and regular-mode designs by using a Heidelberg light detection and ranging (LiDAR) Operations Simulator (HELIOS). The results demonstrated that an iterative-mode design can improve the scan completeness of trees compared to the regular-mode design. The tree attribute (diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height, stem curve, and crown volume) estimates of the iterative-mode design were less erroneous than those of the regular-mode design (e.g., the root-mean-square error (RMSE) could decrease the stem curve estimation by 38% and the crown volume estimation by 15%). This study suggests that the iterative-mode design can obtain an improved quality of the TLS data, especially for dense stands.

[1]  Guangjian Yan,et al.  Estimation of forest leaf area index using terrestrial laser scanning data and path length distribution model in open-canopy forests , 2018, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[2]  Vaughan R. Pratt,et al.  Direct least-squares fitting of algebraic surfaces , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[3]  M. Disney Terrestrial LiDAR: a three-dimensional revolution in how we look at trees. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[4]  M. Herold,et al.  Data acquisition considerations for Terrestrial Laser Scanning of forest plots , 2017 .

[5]  A. Skidmore,et al.  Quantification of occlusions influencing the tree stem curve retrieving from single-scan terrestrial laser scanning data , 2019, Forest Ecosystems.

[6]  J. Trochta,et al.  3D Forest: An application for descriptions of three-dimensional forest structures using terrestrial LiDAR , 2017, PloS one.

[7]  AstrupRasmus,et al.  Approaches for estimating stand-level volume using terrestrial laser scanning in a single-scan mode , 2014 .

[8]  Christoph Gollob,et al.  Influence of Scanner Position and Plot Size on the Accuracy of Tree Detection and Diameter Estimation Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning on Forest Inventory Plots , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[9]  Wuming Zhang,et al.  Efficient registration of terrestrial LiDAR scans using a coarse-to-fine strategy for forestry applications , 2016 .

[10]  Bangqian Chen,et al.  Simulation of multi-platform LiDAR for assessing total leaf area in tree crowns , 2019, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[11]  David L.B. Jupp,et al.  Measuring tree stem diameters using intensity profiles from ground-based scanning lidar from a fixed viewpoint , 2011 .

[12]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  International benchmarking of terrestrial laser scanning approaches for forest inventories , 2018, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Anthony G. Vorster,et al.  Non-destructive aboveground biomass estimation of coniferous trees using terrestrial LiDAR , 2017 .

[14]  Wuming Zhang,et al.  Quantifying Understory and Overstory Vegetation Cover Using UAV-Based RGB Imagery in Forest Plantation , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[15]  Guangjian Yan,et al.  Estimating the leaf area of an individual tree in urban areas using terrestrial laser scanner and path length distribution model , 2018, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Krzysztof Stereńczak,et al.  Horizon visibility and accuracy of stocking determination on circular sample plots using automated remote measurement techniques , 2013 .

[17]  Bernhard Höfle,et al.  HELIOS: A MULTI-PURPOSE LIDAR SIMULATION FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCH, PLANNING AND TRAINING OF LASER SCANNING OPERATIONS WITH AIRBORNE, GROUND-BASED MOBILE AND STATIONARY PLATFORMS , 2016 .

[18]  Mikko Kuronen,et al.  Correcting for nondetection in estimating forest characteristics from single-scan terrestrial laser measurements , 2019, Canadian Journal of Forest Research.

[19]  M. Wing,et al.  Consumer-Grade Global Positioning System (GPS) Accuracy and Reliability , 2005 .

[20]  M. Vastaranta,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning in forest inventories , 2016 .

[21]  Mark J. Ducey,et al.  Adjusting for nondetection in forest inventories derived from terrestrial laser scanning , 2013 .

[22]  Håkan Olsson,et al.  Estimating tree stem density and diameter distribution in single-scan terrestrial laser measurements of field plots: a simulation study , 2018 .

[23]  E. Naesset,et al.  Assessing Point Accuracy of DGPS Under Forest Canopy Before Data Acquisition, in the Field and After Postprocessing , 2002 .

[24]  Kamil Král,et al.  Arrangement of terrestrial laser scanner positions for area-wide stem mapping of natural forests , 2013 .

[25]  Michael E. Schaepman,et al.  Quantifying 3D structure and occlusion in dense tropical and temperate forests using close-range LiDAR , 2019, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[26]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Sampling design of ground-based lidar measurements of forest canopy structure and its effect on shadowing , 2008 .

[27]  M. Menenti,et al.  Scanning geometry: Influencing factor on the quality of terrestrial laser scanning points , 2011 .

[28]  Christian Ammer,et al.  Efficient measurements of basal area in short rotation forests based on terrestrial laser scanning under special consideration of shadowing , 2014 .

[29]  Klaus Scipal,et al.  Ground Data are Essential for Biomass Remote Sensing Missions , 2019, Surveys in Geophysics.

[30]  C. Silva,et al.  Individual tree detection from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) derived canopy height model in an open canopy mixed conifer forest , 2017 .

[31]  Bisheng Yang,et al.  A new method for 3D individual tree extraction using multispectral airborne LiDAR point clouds , 2018, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[32]  K. O. Niemann,et al.  Local Maximum Filtering for the Extraction of Tree Locations and Basal Area from High Spatial Resolution Imagery , 2000 .

[33]  David O'Sullivan,et al.  International Journal of Geographical Information Science , 2022 .

[34]  Kenji Omasa,et al.  Voxel-Based 3-D Modeling of Individual Trees for Estimating Leaf Area Density Using High-Resolution Portable Scanning Lidar , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[35]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Automatic Stem Mapping Using Single-Scan Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[36]  M. Verstraete,et al.  Estimating leaf area distribution in savanna trees from terrestrial LiDAR measurements , 2011 .

[37]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Realistic Forest Stand Reconstruction from Terrestrial LiDAR for Radiative Transfer Modelling , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[38]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  An International Comparison of Individual Tree Detection and Extraction Using Airborne Laser Scanning , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[39]  Wuming Zhang,et al.  A Novel Approach for the Detection of Standing Tree Stems from Plot-Level Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data , 2019, Remote. Sens..