A systematic test of time-to-failure analysis

SUMMARY Time-to-failure analysis is a technique for predicting earthquakes in which a failure function is fit to a time-series of accumulated BenioV strain. BenioV strain is computed from regional seismicity in areas that may produce a large earthquake. We have tested the technique by fitting two functions, a power law proposed by Bufe & Varnes (1993) and a log-periodic function proposed by Sornette & Sammis (1995). We compared predictions from the two time-to-failure models to observed activity and to predicted levels of activity based upon the Poisson model. Likelihood ratios show that the most successful model is Poisson, with the simple Poisson model four times as likely to be correct as the best time-to-failure model. The best time-failure model is a blend of 90 per cent Poisson and 10 per cent log-periodic predictions. We tested the accuracy of the error estimates produced by the standard least-squares fitter and found greater accuracy for fits of the simple power law than for fits of the more complicated logperiodic function. The least-squares fitter underestimates the true error in time-tofailure functions because the error estimates are based upon linearized versions of the functions being fitted.

[1]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  Two current seismic quiescences within 40 km of Tokyo , 1997 .

[2]  Richard C. Aster,et al.  Differential analysis of coda Q using similar microearthquakes in seismic gaps. Part 1: Techniques and application to seismograms recorded in the Anza Seismic gap , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Statistical tests of VAN earthquake predictions: Comments and reflections , 1996 .

[4]  Max Wyss,et al.  Probability of chance correlations of earthquakes with predictions in areas of heterogeneous seismicity rate: The VAN Case , 1996 .

[5]  H. Wakita.  Geochemical challenge to earthquake prediction. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Complex Critical Exponents from Renormalization Group Theory of Earthquakes: Implications for Earthquake Predictions , 1995 .

[7]  C. Kisslinger,et al.  Tests of models of aftershock rate decay , 1994 .

[8]  Stuart P. Nishenko,et al.  Seismicity trends and potential for large earthquakes in the Alaska-Aleutian region , 1994 .

[9]  M. S. Lazaridou,et al.  Latest aspects of earthquake prediction in Greece based on seismic electric signals, II☆ , 1993 .

[10]  David J. Varnes,et al.  Predictive modeling of the seismic cycle of the Greater San Francisco Bay Region , 1993 .

[11]  Yan Y. Kagan,et al.  Seismic Gap Hypothesis: Ten years after , 1991 .

[12]  Leon Knopoff,et al.  Intermediate‐term prediction in advance of the Loma Prieta Earthquake , 1990 .

[13]  Jon B. Fletcher,et al.  Changes in shear wave splitting at Anza near the time of the North Palm Springs Earthquake , 1990 .

[14]  C. Kisslinger.  An experiment in earthquake prediction and the 7 May 1986 Andreanof Islands earthquake , 1988 .

[15]  W. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Sci-entific Computing , 1986 .

[16]  T. Utsu.  A statistical study on the occurrence of aftershocks. , 1961 .

[17]  D. Varnes,et al.  The cyclic and fractal seismic series preceding an mb 4.8 earthquake on 1980 February 14 near the Virgin Islands , 1996 .

[18]  John B. Rundle,et al.  Reduction And Predictability Of Natural Disasters , 1996 .

[19]  Joab R Winkler,et al.  Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing, second edition , 1993 .

[20]  E. Engdahl,et al.  Seismicity Map of North America Project , 1991 .