Infant Skin Microstructure Assessed In Vivo Differs from Adult Skin in Organization and at the Cellular Level

Abstract:  Functional differences between infant and adult skin may be attributed to putative differences in skin microstructure. The purpose of this study was to examine infant skin microstructure in vivo and to compare it with that of adult skin. The lower thigh area of 20 healthy mothers (ages 25–43) and their biological children (ages 3–24 months) was examined using in vivo noninvasive methods including fluorescence spectroscopy, video microscopy, and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Stratum corneum and supra‐papillary epidermal thickness as well as cell size in the granular layer were assessed from the confocal images. Adhesive tapes were used to remove corneocytes from the outer‐most layer of stratum corneum and their size was computed using image analysis. Surface features showed differences in glyph density and surface area. Infant stratum corneum was found to be 30% and infant epidermis 20% thinner than in adults. Infant corneocytes were found to be 20% and granular cells 10% smaller than adult corneocytes indicating a more rapid cell turnover in infants. This observation was confirmed by fluorescence spectroscopy. Dermal papillae density and size distribution also differed. Surprisingly, a distinct direct structural relationship between the stratum corneum morphology and the dermal papillae was observed exclusively in infant skin. A change in reflected signal intensity at ∼100 μm indicating the transition between papillary and reticular dermis was evident only in adult skin. We demonstrate in vivo qualitative and quantitative differences in morphology between infant and adult skin. These differences in skin microstructure may help explain some of the reported functional differences.

[1]  Milind Rajadhyaksha,et al.  Changing paradigms in dermatology: confocal microscopy in clinical and surgical dermatology. , 2003, Clinics in dermatology.

[2]  M Rajadhyaksha,et al.  In vivo confocal microscopy in dermatology. , 2001, Dermatologic clinics.

[3]  N Kollias,et al.  Endogenous skin fluorescence includes bands that may serve as quantitative markers of aging and photoaging. , 1998, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[4]  M. Visscher,et al.  Changes in Diapered and Nondiapered Infant Skin Over the First Month of Life , 2000, Pediatric dermatology.

[5]  N. Kollias,et al.  Non-invasive method for quantitative evaluation of exogenous compound deposition on skin. , 2002, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[6]  Ranjit Chatterjee,et al.  Biomedical Assessment and Instrumental Evaluation of Healthy Infant Skin , 2002, Pediatric dermatology.

[7]  Howard I Maibach,et al.  Age and skin structure and function, a quantitative approach (I): blood flow, pH, thickness, and ultrasound echogenicity , 2005, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[8]  U. Blume-Peytavi,et al.  Stratum Corneum Maturation , 2004, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[9]  N Kollias,et al.  Fluorescence Excitation Spectroscopy for the Measurement of Epidermal Proliferation ¶ , 2001, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[10]  P. Hoeger,et al.  Skin Physiology of the Neonate and Young Infant: A Prospective Study of Functional Skin Parameters During Early Infancy , 2002, Pediatric dermatology.

[11]  K. Kaulback,et al.  The Socioeconomic Impact of Atopic Dermatitis in the United States: A Systematic Review , 2008, Pediatric dermatology.

[12]  N. Kollias,et al.  Facial skin fluorescence as a marker of the skin's response to chronic environmental insults and its dependence on age , 2006, The British journal of dermatology.

[13]  G. Grove,et al.  Corneocytes Size as An Indirect Measure of Epidermal Proliferative Activity , 1983 .

[14]  J. Fairley,et al.  Comparison of stratum corneum thickness in children and adults. , 1983, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[15]  G. Lin,et al.  The in vivo fluorescence of tryptophan moieties in human skin increases with UV exposure and is a marker for epidermal proliferation. , 1999, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[16]  N. Kollias,et al.  Barrier function and water-holding and transport properties of infant stratum corneum are different from adult and continue to develop through the first year of life. , 2008, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[17]  M Rajadhyaksha,et al.  Topographic variations in normal skin, as viewed by in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy. , 2001, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[18]  U. Blume-Peytavi,et al.  Stratum corneum maturation. A review of neonatal skin function. , 2004, Skin pharmacology and physiology.

[19]  N. Evans,et al.  Development of the epidermis in the newborn. , 1986, Biology of the neonate.

[20]  Hachiro Tagami,et al.  Three‐dimensional analyses of individual corneocytes with atomic force microscope: morphological changes related to age, location and to the pathologic skin conditions , 2002, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[21]  H. Tagami,et al.  Number of cell layers of the stratum corneum in normal skin – relationship to the anatomical location on the body, age, sex and physical parameters , 1999, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[22]  Laura Vitellaro‐Zuccarello,et al.  Stereological analysis of collagen and elastic fibers in the normal human dermis: Variability with age, sex, and body region , 1994, The Anatomical record.

[23]  Tetsuji Hirao,et al.  Water content and thickness of the stratum corneum contribute to skin surface morphology , 2000, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[24]  Thilo Gambichler,et al.  Age related changes of human skin investigated with histometric measurements by confocal laser scanning microscopy in vivo , 2002, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[25]  Michael Landthaler,et al.  In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy in dermatology , 2007, Lasers in Medical Science.

[26]  Egbert Lenderink,et al.  Characterization of age-related effects in human skin: A comparative study that applies confocal laser scanning microscopy and optical coherence tomography. , 2004, Journal of biomedical optics.

[27]  T. Gambichler,et al.  In vivo data of epidermal thickness evaluated by optical coherence tomography: effects of age, gender, skin type, and anatomic site. , 2006, Journal of dermatological science.

[28]  A. Stavreus-Evers,et al.  Erythema Toxicum Neonatorum Is an Innate Immune Response to Commensal Microbes Penetrated into the Skin of the Newborn Infant , 2005, Pediatric Research.

[29]  P. Payne,et al.  Skin thickness measurement by pulsed ultrasound; its reproducibility, validation and variability , 1982, The British journal of dermatology.