Elementary Teachers’ Attitudes and Stages of Concern About an Agricultural Literacy Curriculum

The purpose of this study was to describe elementary teachers’ attitudes and perceptions toward agriculture and its use as a context for teaching across the grade level content area standards. Further, this study sought to probe more deeply the stages of concern possessed by kindergarten through eighth grade teachers with respect to their use of the California Curriculum Guidelines for Agricultural Literacy Awareness (CCGALA), which is aligned to content area state standards. Results indicated that elementary teachers generally hold favorable attitudes toward agriculture as a viable integrating tool to teach across disciplines. Elementary teachers who reported using CCGALA were unique in their highest stage of concern, but all of the sample members recorded first or second highest stages of concern at the informational stage, thereby indicating a desire to continue gathering information related to the educational innovation. Users of CCGALA recorded the highest relative intensity in the Informational and Personal stages of concern and lowest intensities in the Refocusing and Consequence stages. Non-users recorded the highest relative intensities in the Awareness and Informational stages, with lowest relative intensities in the Refocusing, Consequence, and Collaboration stages. Recommendations for focused delivery of professional development activities were made. Introduction/Theoretical Framework Beginning teachers are faced with many responsibilities and challenges as they embark on their chosen profession. Not only do they face the pressures of standards-based educational accountability, but they also have specific concerns unique to beginning educational professionals. The Moir Model (Joerger, 2002) conceptualized specific stages through which a teacher progresses during the first year of teaching. From anticipation to survival to disillusionment, new teachers experience a seemingly downward spiral during the first few months of teaching. After a period of rejuvenation, teachers then move through a reflection period until they cycle back in anticipation of the next year. There are many contributors to this period of uncertainty, all of which affect teacher retention rates. Alarmingly, average teacher attrition rates during the first three years can range from 30% to 60% (Darling-Hammond, 2002). Educational accountability demands are also factors contributing to the pressures placed on teachers at all stages of their careers, but these demands may be particularly concerning to a new professional seeking job retention and tenure. Student performance on standardized achievement tests often determines levels of school funding for subsequent years, as well as whether or not administrators retain their positions for the following academic year. In addition, state performance standards often guide teachers in selecting curricula that will best prepare students for success on standards-based achievement tests. To that end, beginning teachers are not only concerned with how to teach, but with what to teach in order to meet standards. As such,

[1]  David Kember,et al.  The Instructional Designer as a Staff Developer: A Course Team Approach Consistent with a Concerns-Based Adoption Model. , 1990 .

[2]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[3]  James R. Lindner,et al.  HANDLING NONRESPONSE IN SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH , 2001 .

[4]  David Nolan Using computers in education: A concerns-based approach to professional development of teachers , 1989 .

[5]  J. Dewey Experience and Education , 1938 .

[6]  M. Balschweid Agriculture and Science Integration: A Pre-service Prescription for Contextual Learning. , 2000 .

[7]  R. Cole,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF AN AGRICULTURAL LITERACY TREATMENT ON PARTICIPATING K-12 TEACHERS AND THEIR CURRICULA Mark A. Balschweid, Assistant Professor , 1998 .

[8]  G. Moore The Forgotten Leader in Agricultural Education: Rufus W. Stimson , 1988 .

[9]  C. Trexler,et al.  Rural Elementary Students' Understanding of Science and Agricultural Education Benchmarks Related to Meat and Livestock. , 2003 .

[10]  Carol A. Conroy,et al.  USING AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION AS THE CONTEXT TO TEACH LIFE SKILLS , 2001 .

[11]  AN ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT AGRICULTURAL LITERACY KNOWLEDGE BASED ON THE FOOD AND FIBER SYSTEMS LITERACY FRAMEWORK , 2005 .

[12]  Gregory W. Thompson,et al.  INTEGRATING SCIENCE IN AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION: ATTITUDES OF INDIANA AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND BUSINESS TEACHERS Mark A. Balschweid, Assistant Professor , 2002 .

[13]  R. Terry,et al.  Assistance Needed for Elementary Teachers in Texas to Implement Programs of Agricultural Literacy , 1992 .

[14]  Agricultural Education Teachers' Ability to Solve Agriculturally Related Mathematics Problems. , 1994 .

[15]  Lev Vygotsky Mind in society , 1978 .

[16]  C. Myers Educational Psychology , 1904, Nature.

[17]  Robert A. Martin,et al.  Agricultural Awareness Activities and Their Integration into the Curriculum as Perceived by Elementary Teachers. , 2000 .

[18]  A. C. Monahan,et al.  Agricultural education in secondary schools , 1912 .

[19]  Jerry Willis Technology Diffusion in the "Soft Disciplines": Using Social Technology to Support Information Technology , 1992 .

[20]  John Ward,et al.  Mentoring: A Strategy for Change in Teacher Technology Education , 2002 .

[21]  Gene E. Hall,et al.  Change in Schools: Facilitating the Process. SUNY Series in Educational Leadership. , 1987 .

[22]  S. Mitchell Improving Instructional Decision Making: The Relationship between Level of Use of Evaluation and Student Achievement. , 1988 .

[23]  D. Croom,et al.  Foundations of Agricultural Education , 2005 .

[24]  C. Newhouse Applying the Concerns-based Adoption Model to Research on Computers in Classrooms , 2001 .

[25]  G. Hall Measuring Stages of Concern about the Innovation: A Manual for the Use of the SoC Questionnaire. , 1977 .

[26]  Carol A. Conroy Identifying Barriers to Infusion of Aquaculture into Secondary Agriscience: Adoption of a Curriculum Innovation. , 1999 .

[27]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[28]  L. Darling-Hammond Solving the Dilemmas of Teacher Supply, Demand, and Standards: How We Can Ensure a Competent, Caring, and Qualified Teacher for Every Child. , 2000 .

[29]  Colin J. Marsh Implementation of a Social Studies Curriculum in an Australian Elementary School , 1987, The Elementary School Journal.

[30]  C. R. Harris,et al.  Agricultural Literacy of Missouri Secondary School Educators. , 1996 .

[31]  Warren C. Hope Resolving teachers' concerns about microcomputer technology , 1997 .

[32]  James Connors,et al.  The Influence of Agriscience and Natural Resources Curriculum on Students' Science Achievement Scores. , 1995 .

[33]  S. Barab,et al.  Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation , 2003 .

[34]  D. Schunk Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective , 1991 .

[35]  M. Suvedi,et al.  Perception of Agriculture as a Context for Elementary Science Teaching: A Case of Change in Sanilac County, Michigan. , 1998 .