Hierarchy and Ecological Control in Federal Budgetary Decision Making

A central issue for fiscal sociology is the articulation between state and society. Operationally, what is required is the embedding of bureaucratic decision making in history. This article proposes the concepts of hierarcy and ecological control as one possible bridge between organization theorists and macro sociologists. A stochastic process model of federal budgetary decision making within the executive branch is developed and tested using HUD program allocation data from the Johnson administration. The model emphasizes that budgets emerge from the interaction of three levels of organizational decision making, each of which is embedded in a distinct cultural context. Historical application focuses on the impact of the Vietnam War on domestic antipoverty and housing programs.

[1]  Feller William,et al.  An Introduction To Probability Theory And Its Applications , 1950 .

[2]  John C. Campbell.  Contemporary Japanese budget politics , 1973 .

[3]  D. Bös.  Crisis of the tax state , 1982 .

[4]  C. Lindblom.  Decision-Making in Taxation and Expenditures , 1961 .

[5]  Rudolf Goldscheid.  A Sociological Approach to Problems of Public Finance , 1958 .

[6]  J. Gist.  Mandatory expenditures and the defense sector : theory of budgetary incrementalism , 1974 .

[7]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Ambiguity and choice in organizations , 1976 .

[8]  I. C. Bupp,et al.  Policy and Priority in the Budgetary Process , 1973, American Political Science Review.

[9]  James O’Connor,et al.  The fiscal crisis of the state , 1973 .

[10]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[11]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[12]  Richard I. Hofferbert.  The Relation between Public Policy and Some Structural and Environmental Variables in the American States , 1966, American Political Science Review.

[13]  R. Musgrave,et al.  Public Finance in Theory and Practice , 1961 .

[14]  A. Wildavsky,et al.  The Politics of the Budgetary Process. , 1965 .

[15]  Tunc Geveci,et al.  Advanced Calculus , 2014, Nature.

[16]  William Feller,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 1951 .

[17]  Morton H. Halperin,et al.  Bureaucratic Politics And Foreign Policy , 1975 .

[18]  Douglas A. Hibbs,et al.  Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy , 1977, American Political Science Review.

[19]  H. Simon,et al.  Essays on the Structure of Social Science Models. , 1964 .

[20]  Norman Frohlich,et al.  Political leadership and collective goods , 1971 .

[21]  T. Skocpol,et al.  States and Social Revolutions , 1979 .

[22]  A. Wildavsky.  Budgeting : A Comparative Theory of Budgetary Processes , 1975 .

[23]  Thomas F. Hady,et al.  Crecine, John P., Governmental Problem-Solving: A Computer Simulation of Municipal Budgeting, Chicago, Rand McNally, 1969, xx + 338 pp. ($6.50) , 1970 .

[24]  I. Sharkansky.  The politics of taxing and spending , 1969 .

[25]  Daniel A. Bell,et al.  The Cultural Contradictions Of Capitalism , 1976 .

[26]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Man. , 1957 .

[27]  John F. Padgett.  Bounded Rationality in Budgetary Research , 1980, American Political Science Review.

[28]  T. Dye,et al.  Politics, economics, and the public : policy outcomes in the American States , 1968 .